[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fDKpn6Gkx9MW839EYo0CW9ZDIjUaayFMaBhq2btIAWQ4":3,"g5a-ex:cisco\u002Fsecure_access_control_server@*":311,"g5a-family:cisco\u002Fsecure_access_control_server":313},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":161,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":230,"kevVulnerabilities":289,"seoMetadata":290,"meta":309},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":160},"cisco","secure_access_control_server",68,35,0,"2015-10-30",[14,18,21,23,26,28,30,33,35,37,39,41,43,45,47,50,52,54,56,59,62,64,66,68,70,72,74,76,78,81,83,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99,101,103,105,107,109,112,114,116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,140,142,144,146,148,150,152,154,156,158],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.0",2,false,{"version":19,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.1",6,{"version":22,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.1\\(4\\)",{"version":24,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.3",4,{"version":27,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.3\\(1\\)",{"version":29,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.3\\(2\\)",{"version":31,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.3\\(3\\)",3,{"version":34,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.3.5.1",{"version":36,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.3.6.1",{"version":38,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.4",{"version":40,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.4\\(1\\)",{"version":42,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.4\\(2\\)",{"version":44,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.42",{"version":46,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.5",{"version":48,"cve_count":49,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.6",5,{"version":51,"cve_count":49,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.6.2",{"version":53,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.6.3",{"version":55,"cve_count":49,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"2.6.4",{"version":57,"cve_count":58,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.0",12,{"version":60,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.0.1",8,{"version":63,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.0.2",{"version":65,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.0.3",{"version":67,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.0.4",{"version":69,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.1",{"version":71,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.1.1",{"version":73,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.1.2",{"version":75,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2",{"version":77,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2.1",{"version":79,"cve_count":80,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2\\(1\\)",7,{"version":82,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2\\(1.20\\)",{"version":84,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2.2",{"version":86,"cve_count":80,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2\\(2\\)",{"version":88,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2\\(2\\)_build_15",{"version":90,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2.3",{"version":92,"cve_count":80,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.2\\(3\\)",{"version":94,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.3",{"version":96,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.3.1",{"version":98,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.3\\(1\\)",{"version":100,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.3.2",{"version":102,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.3.3",{"version":104,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"3.3.4",{"version":106,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.0",{"version":108,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.0.1",{"version":110,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.1",1,{"version":113,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.1.2",{"version":115,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.1.3",{"version":117,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.1.4",{"version":119,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.1.4.13",{"version":121,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2",{"version":123,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1",{"version":125,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.0",{"version":127,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.1",{"version":129,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.10",{"version":131,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.11",{"version":133,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.2",{"version":135,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.3",{"version":137,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.4",{"version":139,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.6",{"version":141,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.7",{"version":143,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.8",{"version":145,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.2.1.15.9",{"version":147,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.0",{"version":149,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.1",{"version":151,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.2",{"version":153,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.3",{"version":155,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.5\\(0.1\\)",{"version":157,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.5\\(0.46.2\\)",{"version":159,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.7.0.15","Secure Access Control Server by Cisco is a technology product with 68 tracked versions and 35 known security vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":19,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":22,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":24,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":27,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":29,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":31,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":34,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":36,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":38,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":40,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":42,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":44,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":46,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":48,"cve_count":49,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":51,"cve_count":49,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":53,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":55,"cve_count":49,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":57,"cve_count":58,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":60,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":63,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":65,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":67,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":69,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":71,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":73,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":75,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":77,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":79,"cve_count":80,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":82,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":84,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":86,"cve_count":80,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":88,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":90,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":92,"cve_count":80,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":94,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":96,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":98,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":100,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":102,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":104,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":106,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":108,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":110,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":113,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":115,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":117,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":119,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":121,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":123,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":125,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":127,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":129,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":131,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":133,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":135,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":137,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":139,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":141,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":143,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":145,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":147,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":149,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":151,"cve_count":32,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":153,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":155,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":157,"cve_count":111,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":159,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},[231,238,244,251,258,263,268,273,278,284],{"cveId":232,"description":233,"publishedDate":234,"cvssScore":49,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":236,"isKev":17,"epssScore":237},"CVE-2005-0356","Multiple TCP implementations with Protection Against Wrapped Sequence Numbers (PAWS) with the timestamps option enabled allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection loss) via a spoofed packet with a large timer value, which causes the host to discard later packets because they appear to be too old.","2005-05-31","v2","Medium",0.82756,{"cveId":239,"description":240,"publishedDate":241,"cvssScore":242,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":236,"isKev":17,"epssScore":243},"CVE-2006-3101","Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LogonProxy.cgi in Cisco Secure ACS for UNIX 2.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) error, (2) SSL, and (3) Ok parameters.","2006-06-21",4.3,0.24003,{"cveId":245,"description":246,"publishedDate":247,"cvssScore":248,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":249,"isKev":17,"epssScore":250},"CVE-2006-4098","Stack-based buffer overflow in the CSRadius service in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows before 4.1 and ACS Solution Engine before 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RADIUS Accounting-Request packet.","2006-12-31",10,"Critical",0.12902,{"cveId":252,"description":253,"publishedDate":254,"cvssScore":255,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":256,"isKev":17,"epssScore":257},"CVE-2007-0105","Stack-based buffer overflow in the CSAdmin service in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows before 4.1 and ACS Solution Engine before 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP GET request.","2007-01-09",7.5,"High",0.11177,{"cveId":259,"description":260,"publishedDate":261,"cvssScore":248,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":249,"isKev":17,"epssScore":262},"CVE-2004-1099","Cisco Secure Access Control Server for Windows (ACS Windows) and Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine (ACS Solution Engine) 3.3.1, when the EAP-TLS protocol is enabled, does not properly handle expired or untrusted certificates, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access via a \"cryptographically correct\" certificate with valid fields such as the username.","2005-01-10",0.10195,{"cveId":264,"description":265,"publishedDate":266,"cvssScore":248,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":249,"isKev":17,"epssScore":267},"CVE-2000-1054","Buffer overflow in CSAdmin module in CiscoSecure ACS Server 2.4(2) and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary commands via a large packet.","2000-12-11",0.08386,{"cveId":269,"description":270,"publishedDate":271,"cvssScore":255,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":256,"isKev":17,"epssScore":272},"CVE-2003-0210","Buffer overflow in the administration service (CSAdmin) for Cisco Secure ACS before 3.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long user parameter to port 2002.","2003-05-12",0.06007,{"cveId":274,"description":275,"publishedDate":276,"cvssScore":255,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":256,"isKev":17,"epssScore":277},"CVE-2002-0159","Format string vulnerability in the administration function in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows, 2.6.x and earlier and 3.x through 3.01 (build 40), allows remote attackers to crash the CSADMIN  module only (denial of service of administration function) or execute arbitrary code via format strings in the URL to port 2002.","2002-04-22",0.05439,{"cveId":279,"description":280,"publishedDate":281,"cvssScore":282,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":249,"isKev":17,"epssScore":283},"CVE-2013-3466","The EAP-FAST authentication module in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 4.x before 4.2.1.15.11, when a RADIUS server configuration is enabled, does not properly parse user identities, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted EAP-FAST packets, aka Bug ID CSCui57636.","2013-08-29",9.3,0.05122,{"cveId":285,"description":286,"publishedDate":247,"cvssScore":287,"cvssVersion":235,"severity":256,"isKev":17,"epssScore":288},"CVE-2006-4097","Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the CSRadius service in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows before 4.1 and ACS Solution Engine before 4.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted RADIUS Access-Request packet.  NOTE: it has been reported that at least one issue is a heap-based buffer overflow involving the Tunnel-Password attribute.",7.8,0.04286,[],{"title":291,"metaDescription":292,"keywords":293,"structuredData":294},"Secure Access Control Server by Cisco - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Secure Access Control Server by Cisco covering 68 versions with 35 tracked vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Secure Access Control Server vulnerabilities, Secure Access Control Server security, Secure Access Control Server CVE, Cisco Secure Access Control Server, Secure Access Control Server threat intelligence, Cisco security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking",{"@context":295,"@type":296,"name":297,"description":292,"url":298,"manufacturer":299,"applicationCategory":303,"softwareVersion":304,"mainEntity":305},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Secure Access Control Server","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Fcisco\u002Fsecure_access_control_server",{"@type":300,"name":301,"url":302},"Organization","Cisco","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Fcisco","Security Software","68 versions tracked",{"@type":306,"name":307,"description":308,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Secure Access Control Server Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Secure Access Control Server by Cisco",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":310,"apiVersion":57},"2026-10-18T15:48:13.090Z",{"rows":312,"total":11,"capped":17,"failed":11},[],[314],{"product":315,"cves":49},"secure_access_control_server_solution_engine"]