[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fFje1Lkv4tC-8MmRXpe2RovBDo8SWHwiNGIy9oQXB8aM":3,"g5a-ex:citrix\u002Fxenserver@*":170,"g5a-family:citrix\u002Fxenserver":172},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":65,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":86,"kevVulnerabilities":147,"seoMetadata":148,"meta":167},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":64},"citrix","xenserver",20,51,0,"2024-06-13",[14,18,21,23,26,28,31,34,36,38,41,44,46,48,51,54,56,58,60,62],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.1",1,false,{"version":19,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"4.1.0",2,{"version":22,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.0",{"version":24,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.5",3,{"version":27,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"5.6",{"version":29,"cve_count":30,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"6.0",8,{"version":32,"cve_count":33,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"6.0.2",26,{"version":35,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"6.1",{"version":37,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"6.1.0",{"version":39,"cve_count":40,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"6.2.0",28,{"version":42,"cve_count":43,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"6.5",23,{"version":45,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"6.5.0",{"version":47,"cve_count":40,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"7.0",{"version":49,"cve_count":50,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"7.1",14,{"version":52,"cve_count":53,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"7.2",5,{"version":55,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"7.3",{"version":57,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"7.4",{"version":59,"cve_count":53,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"7.5",{"version":61,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"7.6",{"version":63,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"8.0","Xenserver by Citrix is a technology product with 20 tracked versions and 51 known security vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":19,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":22,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":24,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":27,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":29,"cve_count":30,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":32,"cve_count":33,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":35,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":37,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":39,"cve_count":40,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":42,"cve_count":43,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":45,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":47,"cve_count":40,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":49,"cve_count":50,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":52,"cve_count":53,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":55,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":57,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":59,"cve_count":53,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":61,"cve_count":25,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":63,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},[87,95,103,109,115,120,126,132,138,142],{"cveId":88,"description":89,"publishedDate":90,"cvssScore":91,"cvssVersion":92,"severity":93,"isKev":17,"epssScore":94},"CVE-2018-14007","Citrix XenServer 7.1 and newer allows Directory Traversal.","2018-08-15",9.8,"v3.0","Critical",0.56147,{"cveId":96,"description":97,"publishedDate":98,"cvssScore":99,"cvssVersion":100,"severity":101,"isKev":17,"epssScore":102},"CVE-2012-0217","The x86-64 kernel system-call functionality in Xen 4.1.2 and earlier, as used in Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier and other products; Oracle Solaris 11 and earlier; illumos before r13724; Joyent SmartOS before 20120614T184600Z; FreeBSD before 9.0-RELEASE-p3; NetBSD 6.0 Beta and earlier; Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 and R2 SP1 and Windows 7 Gold and SP1; and possibly other operating systems, when running on an Intel processor, incorrectly uses the sysret path in cases where a certain address is not a canonical address, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application.  NOTE: because this issue is due to incorrect use of the Intel specification, it should have been split into separate identifiers; however, there was some value in preserving the original mapping of the multi-codebase coordinated-disclosure effort to a single identifier.","2012-06-12",7.2,"v2","High",0.39835,{"cveId":104,"description":105,"publishedDate":106,"cvssScore":107,"cvssVersion":92,"severity":101,"isKev":17,"epssScore":108},"CVE-2018-8897","A statement in the System Programming Guide of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (SDM) was mishandled in the development of some or all operating-system kernels, resulting in unexpected behavior for #DB exceptions that are deferred by MOV SS or POP SS, as demonstrated by (for example) privilege escalation in Windows, macOS, some Xen configurations, or FreeBSD, or a Linux kernel crash. The MOV to SS and POP SS instructions inhibit interrupts (including NMIs), data breakpoints, and single step trap exceptions until the instruction boundary following the next instruction (SDM Vol. 3A; section 6.8.3). (The inhibited data breakpoints are those on memory accessed by the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction itself.) Note that debug exceptions are not inhibited by the interrupt enable (EFLAGS.IF) system flag (SDM Vol. 3A; section 2.3). If the instruction following the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction is an instruction like SYSCALL, SYSENTER, INT 3, etc. that transfers control to the operating system at CPL \u003C 3, the debug exception is delivered after the transfer to CPL \u003C 3 is complete. OS kernels may not expect this order of events and may therefore experience unexpected behavior when it occurs.","2018-05-08",7.8,0.18485,{"cveId":110,"description":111,"publishedDate":112,"cvssScore":91,"cvssVersion":113,"severity":93,"isKev":17,"epssScore":114},"CVE-2015-7705","The rate limiting feature in NTP 4.x before 4.2.8p4 and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a large number of crafted requests.","2017-08-07","v3.1",0.12151,{"cveId":116,"description":117,"publishedDate":112,"cvssScore":118,"cvssVersion":113,"severity":101,"isKev":17,"epssScore":119},"CVE-2015-7704","The ntpd client in NTP 4.x before 4.2.8p4 and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a number of crafted \"KOD\" messages.",7.5,0.10661,{"cveId":121,"description":122,"publishedDate":123,"cvssScore":124,"cvssVersion":100,"severity":93,"isKev":17,"epssScore":125},"CVE-2014-4947","Buffer overflow in the HVM graphics console support in Citrix XenServer 6.2 Service Pack 1 and earlier has unspecified impact and attack vectors.","2014-07-22",10,0.05392,{"cveId":127,"description":128,"publishedDate":129,"cvssScore":130,"cvssVersion":92,"severity":93,"isKev":17,"epssScore":131},"CVE-2016-9603","A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in QEMU's Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA emulator's VNC display driver support before 2.9; the issue could occur when a VNC client attempted to update its display after a VGA operation is performed by a guest. A privileged user\u002Fprocess inside a guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process or, potentially, execute arbitrary code on the host with privileges of the QEMU process.","2018-07-27",9.9,0.04448,{"cveId":133,"description":134,"publishedDate":135,"cvssScore":136,"cvssVersion":92,"severity":93,"isKev":17,"epssScore":137},"CVE-2017-2615","Quick emulator (QEMU) built with the Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA emulator support is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds access issue. It could occur while copying VGA data via bitblt copy in backward mode. A privileged user inside a guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process resulting in DoS or potentially execute arbitrary code on the host with privileges of QEMU process on the host.","2018-07-03",9.1,0.03648,{"cveId":139,"description":140,"publishedDate":129,"cvssScore":130,"cvssVersion":92,"severity":93,"isKev":17,"epssScore":141},"CVE-2017-2620","Quick emulator (QEMU) before 2.8 built with the Cirrus CLGD 54xx VGA Emulator support is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds access issue. The issue could occur while copying VGA data in cirrus_bitblt_cputovideo. A privileged user inside guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process OR potentially execute arbitrary code on host with privileges of the QEMU process.",0.03559,{"cveId":143,"description":144,"publishedDate":145,"cvssScore":91,"cvssVersion":92,"severity":93,"isKev":17,"epssScore":146},"CVE-2016-5302","Citrix XenServer 7.0 before Hotfix XS70E003, when a deployment has been upgraded from an earlier release, might allow remote attackers on the management network to \"compromise\" a host by leveraging credentials for an Active Directory account.","2016-06-13",0.02551,[],{"title":149,"metaDescription":150,"keywords":151,"structuredData":152},"Xenserver by Citrix - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Xenserver by Citrix covering 20 versions with 51 tracked vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Xenserver vulnerabilities, Xenserver security, Xenserver CVE, Citrix Xenserver, Xenserver threat intelligence, Citrix security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking",{"@context":153,"@type":154,"name":155,"description":150,"url":156,"manufacturer":157,"applicationCategory":161,"softwareVersion":162,"mainEntity":163},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Xenserver","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Fcitrix\u002Fxenserver",{"@type":158,"name":159,"url":160},"Organization","Citrix","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Fcitrix","Security Software","20 versions tracked",{"@type":164,"name":165,"description":166,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Xenserver Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Xenserver by Citrix",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":168,"apiVersion":169},"2026-10-16T23:04:03.198Z","3.0",{"rows":171,"total":11,"capped":17,"failed":11},[],[]]