[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fRgOis7mABYMU9ZCvLPWGB-GfoOlW3RwbrKczryOXXPg":3,"g5a-family:netapp\u002Fclustered_data_ontap":238,"g5a-ex:netapp\u002Fclustered_data_ontap@*":242},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":107,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":149,"kevVulnerabilities":211,"seoMetadata":216,"meta":235},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":106},"netapp","clustered_data_ontap",41,190,1,"2024-07-01",[14,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,45,47,49,51,53,55,58,61,64,66,69,71,73,76,78,80,82,84,86,88,90,93,95,97,99,101,103],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"7.1",0,false,{"version":19,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"7.3.7",{"version":21,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.0",{"version":23,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.0.1",{"version":25,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.0.2",{"version":27,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.0.3",{"version":29,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.0.4",{"version":31,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.0.5",{"version":33,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.1",{"version":35,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.1.1",{"version":37,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.1.2",{"version":39,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.1.3",{"version":41,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.1.4",{"version":43,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.2",2,{"version":46,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.2.1",{"version":48,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.2.2",{"version":50,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.2.3",{"version":52,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.2.4",{"version":54,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.2.5",{"version":56,"cve_count":57,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.3",5,{"version":59,"cve_count":60,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.3.1",7,{"version":62,"cve_count":63,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.3.2",6,{"version":65,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"8.3.2p11",{"version":67,"cve_count":68,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.0",15,{"version":70,"cve_count":63,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.1",{"version":72,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.10.0",{"version":74,"cve_count":75,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.10.1",3,{"version":77,"cve_count":75,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.11.1",{"version":79,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.12.0",{"version":81,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.12.1",{"version":83,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.13.0",{"version":85,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.13.1",{"version":87,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.14.0",{"version":89,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.2",{"version":91,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.3",9,{"version":94,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.4",{"version":96,"cve_count":63,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.5",{"version":98,"cve_count":57,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.6",{"version":100,"cve_count":57,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.7",{"version":102,"cve_count":57,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.8",{"version":104,"cve_count":105,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"9.9.1",4,"Clustered Data Ontap by Netapp is a technology product with 41 tracked versions and 190 known security vulnerabilities including 1 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":19,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":21,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":23,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":25,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":27,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":29,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":31,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":33,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":35,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":37,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":39,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":41,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":43,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":46,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":48,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":50,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":52,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":54,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":56,"cve_count":57,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":59,"cve_count":60,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":62,"cve_count":63,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":65,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":67,"cve_count":68,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":70,"cve_count":63,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":72,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":74,"cve_count":75,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":77,"cve_count":75,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":79,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":81,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":83,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":85,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":87,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":89,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":91,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":94,"cve_count":44,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":96,"cve_count":63,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":98,"cve_count":57,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":100,"cve_count":57,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":102,"cve_count":57,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":104,"cve_count":105,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},[150,157,164,171,177,182,187,194,200,205],{"cveId":151,"description":152,"publishedDate":153,"cvssScore":92,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":155,"isKev":4,"epssScore":156},"CVE-2021-40438","A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.","2021-09-16","v3.1","Critical",0.99999,{"cveId":158,"description":159,"publishedDate":160,"cvssScore":161,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":162,"isKev":17,"epssScore":163},"CVE-2018-15473","OpenSSH through 7.7 is prone to a user enumeration vulnerability due to not delaying bailout for an invalid authenticating user until after the packet containing the request has been fully parsed, related to auth2-gss.c, auth2-hostbased.c, and auth2-pubkey.c.","2018-08-17",5.3,"Medium",0.98631,{"cveId":165,"description":166,"publishedDate":167,"cvssScore":168,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":169,"isKev":17,"epssScore":170},"CVE-2022-3602","A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform\u002Fcompiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6).","2022-11-01",7.5,"High",0.9077,{"cveId":172,"description":173,"publishedDate":174,"cvssScore":175,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":155,"isKev":17,"epssScore":176},"CVE-2020-11984","Apache HTTP server 2.4.32 to 2.4.44 mod_proxy_uwsgi info disclosure and possible RCE","2020-08-07",9.8,0.90039,{"cveId":178,"description":179,"publishedDate":180,"cvssScore":168,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":169,"isKev":17,"epssScore":181},"CVE-2022-30522","If Apache HTTP Server 2.4.53 is configured to do transformations with mod_sed in contexts where the input to mod_sed may be very large, mod_sed may make excessively large memory allocations and trigger an abort.","2022-06-09",0.89529,{"cveId":183,"description":184,"publishedDate":185,"cvssScore":175,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":155,"isKev":17,"epssScore":186},"CVE-2021-3711","In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the \"out\" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the \"outlen\" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the \"out\" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).","2021-08-24",0.87816,{"cveId":188,"description":189,"publishedDate":190,"cvssScore":191,"cvssVersion":192,"severity":169,"isKev":17,"epssScore":193},"CVE-2017-15715","In Apache httpd 2.4.0 to 2.4.29, the expression specified in \u003CFilesMatch> could match '$' to a newline character in a malicious filename, rather than matching only the end of the filename. This could be exploited in environments where uploads of some files are are externally blocked, but only by matching the trailing portion of the filename.","2018-03-26",8.1,"v3.0",0.85452,{"cveId":195,"description":196,"publishedDate":197,"cvssScore":198,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":169,"isKev":17,"epssScore":199},"CVE-2022-1292","The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).","2022-05-03",7.3,0.82612,{"cveId":201,"description":202,"publishedDate":203,"cvssScore":175,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":155,"isKev":17,"epssScore":204},"CVE-2015-7871","Crypto-NAK packets in ntpd in NTP 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4, and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication.","2017-08-07",0.81762,{"cveId":206,"description":207,"publishedDate":208,"cvssScore":209,"cvssVersion":154,"severity":162,"isKev":17,"epssScore":210},"CVE-2019-10092","In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on the error page to be malformed and instead point to a page of their choice. This would only be exploitable where a server was set up with proxying enabled but was misconfigured in such a way that the Proxy Error page was displayed.","2019-09-26",6.1,0.81466,[212],{"cveId":151,"description":152,"publishedDate":153,"cvssScore":92,"severity":155,"isKev":4,"epssScore":156,"cisaVulnName":213,"cisaDateAdded":214,"cisaShortDescription":152,"cisaRequiredAction":215},"Apache HTTP Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)","2021-12-01","Apply updates per vendor instructions.",{"title":217,"metaDescription":218,"keywords":219,"structuredData":220},"Clustered Data Ontap by Netapp - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Clustered Data Ontap by Netapp covering 41 versions with 190 tracked vulnerabilities including 1 critical and 0 high-severity issues and 1 CISA KEV vulnerability. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Clustered Data Ontap vulnerabilities, Clustered Data Ontap security, Clustered Data Ontap CVE, Netapp Clustered Data Ontap, Clustered Data Ontap threat intelligence, Netapp security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking, Clustered Data Ontap KEV, Clustered Data Ontap exploited vulnerabilities",{"@context":221,"@type":222,"name":223,"description":218,"url":224,"manufacturer":225,"applicationCategory":229,"softwareVersion":230,"mainEntity":231},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Clustered Data Ontap","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Fnetapp\u002Fclustered_data_ontap",{"@type":226,"name":227,"url":228},"Organization","Netapp","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Fnetapp","Security Software","41 versions tracked",{"@type":232,"name":233,"description":234,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Clustered Data Ontap Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Clustered Data Ontap by Netapp",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":236,"apiVersion":237},"2026-10-17T00:10:46.815Z","3.0",[239],{"product":240,"cves":241},"clustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connector",23,{"rows":243,"total":11,"capped":17,"failed":16},[244],{"cveId":151,"name":213,"severity":155,"cvss":92,"added":214,"epss":156,"published":245,"ranges":246,"checked":4,"hits":247,"covers":17},"2021-09-16T15:15:07.633",[],[]]