[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fQwJhLdYhB5HtMdou56w3I-FvgyKefocAYWhglUij1FI":3,"g5a-ex:netapp\u002Fontap_antivirus_connector@*":69,"g5a-family:netapp\u002Fontap_antivirus_connector":71},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":14,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":15,"kevVulnerabilities":46,"seoMetadata":47,"meta":66},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":9,"lastCveUpdate":11,"versions":12,"description":13},"netapp","ontap_antivirus_connector",0,5,"2023-05-26",[],"Ontap Antivirus Connector by Netapp is a technology product and 5 known security vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[],[16,25,31,36,42],{"cveId":17,"description":18,"publishedDate":19,"cvssScore":20,"cvssVersion":21,"severity":22,"isKev":23,"epssScore":24},"CVE-2022-2068","In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).","2022-06-21",7.3,"v3.1","High",false,0.96391,{"cveId":26,"description":27,"publishedDate":11,"cvssScore":28,"cvssVersion":21,"severity":29,"isKev":23,"epssScore":30},"CVE-2023-28320","A denial of service vulnerability exists in curl \u003Cv8.1.0 in the way libcurl provides several different backends for resolving host names, selected at build time. If it is built to use the synchronous resolver, it allows name resolves to time-out slow operations using `alarm()` and `siglongjmp()`. When doing this, libcurl used a global buffer that was not mutex protected and a multi-threaded application might therefore crash or otherwise misbehave.",5.9,"Medium",0.02658,{"cveId":32,"description":33,"publishedDate":11,"cvssScore":34,"cvssVersion":21,"severity":22,"isKev":23,"epssScore":35},"CVE-2023-28319","A use after free vulnerability exists in curl \u003Cv8.1.0 in the way libcurl offers a feature to verify an SSH server's public key using a SHA 256 hash. When this check fails, libcurl would free the memory for the fingerprint before it returns an error message containing the (now freed) hash. This flaw risks inserting sensitive heap-based data into the error message that might be shown to users or otherwise get leaked and revealed.",7.5,0.02489,{"cveId":37,"description":38,"publishedDate":11,"cvssScore":39,"cvssVersion":21,"severity":40,"isKev":23,"epssScore":41},"CVE-2023-28322","An information disclosure vulnerability exists in curl \u003Cv8.1.0 when doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data to send, even when the `CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS` option has been set, if the same handle previously wasused to issue a `PUT` request which used that callback. This flaw may surprise the application and cause it to misbehave and either send off the wrong data or use memory after free or similar in the second transfer. The problem exists in the logic for a reused handle when it is (expected to be) changed from a PUT to a POST.",3.7,"Low",0.02211,{"cveId":43,"description":44,"publishedDate":11,"cvssScore":28,"cvssVersion":21,"severity":29,"isKev":23,"epssScore":45},"CVE-2023-28321","An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in curl \u003Cv8.1.0 in the way it supports matching of wildcard patterns when listed as \"Subject Alternative Name\" in TLS server certificates. curl can be built to use its own name matching function for TLS rather than one provided by a TLS library. This private wildcard matching function would match IDN (International Domain Name) hosts incorrectly and could as a result accept patterns that otherwise should mismatch. IDN hostnames are converted to puny code before used for certificate checks. Puny coded names always start with `xn--` and should not be allowed to pattern match, but the wildcard check in curl could still check for `x*`, which would match even though the IDN name most likely contained nothing even resembling an `x`.",0.01806,[],{"title":48,"metaDescription":49,"keywords":50,"structuredData":51},"Ontap Antivirus Connector by Netapp - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Ontap Antivirus Connector by Netapp with 5 tracked vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Ontap Antivirus Connector vulnerabilities, Ontap Antivirus Connector security, Ontap Antivirus Connector CVE, Netapp Ontap Antivirus Connector, Ontap Antivirus Connector threat intelligence, Netapp security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking",{"@context":52,"@type":53,"name":54,"description":49,"url":55,"manufacturer":56,"applicationCategory":60,"softwareVersion":61,"mainEntity":62},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Ontap Antivirus Connector","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Fnetapp\u002Fontap_antivirus_connector",{"@type":57,"name":58,"url":59},"Organization","Netapp","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Fnetapp","Security Software","Multiple versions",{"@type":63,"name":64,"description":65,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":11},"SecurityVulnerability","Ontap Antivirus Connector Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Ontap Antivirus Connector by Netapp",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":9,"lastUpdated":11,"generatedAt":67,"apiVersion":68},"2026-10-19T00:57:28.821Z","3.0",{"rows":70,"total":9,"capped":23,"failed":9},[],[]]