[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fQrYFs1S73yU-063l7YKyadp4aiu_LrMDsjS8LfgkMfU":3,"g5a-family:oracle\u002Fagile_plm":134,"g5a-ex:oracle\u002Fagile_plm@*":140},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":28,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":33,"kevVulnerabilities":95,"seoMetadata":112,"meta":131},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":9,"lastCveUpdate":11,"versions":12,"description":27},"oracle","agile_plm",4,70,"2023-07-18",[13,17,21,24],{"version":14,"cve_count":15,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":4},"9.3.3",17,3,{"version":18,"cve_count":19,"kev_count":20,"has_kev":4},"9.3.4",5,2,{"version":22,"cve_count":23,"kev_count":9,"has_kev":4},"9.3.5",18,{"version":25,"cve_count":26,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":4},"9.3.6",68,"Agile Plm by Oracle is a technology product with 4 tracked versions and 70 known security vulnerabilities including 4 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[29,30,31,32],{"version":14,"cve_count":15,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":4},{"version":18,"cve_count":19,"kev_count":20,"has_kev":4},{"version":22,"cve_count":23,"kev_count":9,"has_kev":4},{"version":25,"cve_count":26,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":4},[34,43,50,57,62,67,73,79,83,89],{"cveId":35,"description":36,"publishedDate":37,"cvssScore":38,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":40,"isKev":41,"epssScore":42},"CVE-2021-45105","Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.","2021-12-18",5.9,"v3.1","Medium",false,0.99999,{"cveId":44,"description":45,"publishedDate":46,"cvssScore":47,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":48,"isKev":4,"epssScore":49},"CVE-2019-2725","Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services). Supported versions that are affected are 10.3.6.0.0 and 12.1.3.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:N\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:H\u002FA:H).","2019-04-26",9.8,"Critical",0.99977,{"cveId":51,"description":52,"publishedDate":53,"cvssScore":54,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":55,"isKev":4,"epssScore":56},"CVE-2017-12617","When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server.","2017-10-04",8.1,"High",0.99968,{"cveId":58,"description":59,"publishedDate":60,"cvssScore":47,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":48,"isKev":4,"epssScore":61},"CVE-2020-1938","When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. This vulnerability report identified a mechanism that allowed: - returning arbitrary files from anywhere in the web application - processing any file in the web application as a JSP Further, if the web application allowed file upload and stored those files within the web application (or the attacker was able to control the content of the web application by some other means) then this, along with the ability to process a file as a JSP, made remote code execution possible. It is important to note that mitigation is only required if an AJP port is accessible to untrusted users. Users wishing to take a defence-in-depth approach and block the vector that permits returning arbitrary files and execution as JSP may upgrade to Apache Tomcat 9.0.31, 8.5.51 or 7.0.100 or later. A number of changes were made to the default AJP Connector configuration in 9.0.31 to harden the default configuration. It is likely that users upgrading to 9.0.31, 8.5.51 or 7.0.100 or later will need to make small changes to their configurations.","2020-02-24",0.9927,{"cveId":63,"description":64,"publishedDate":65,"cvssScore":47,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":48,"isKev":4,"epssScore":66},"CVE-2016-8735","Remote code execution is possible with Apache Tomcat before 6.0.48, 7.x before 7.0.73, 8.x before 8.0.39, 8.5.x before 8.5.7, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M12 if JmxRemoteLifecycleListener is used and an attacker can reach JMX ports. The issue exists because this listener wasn't updated for consistency with the CVE-2016-3427 Oracle patch that affected credential types.","2017-04-06",0.90338,{"cveId":68,"description":69,"publishedDate":70,"cvssScore":71,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":55,"isKev":41,"epssScore":72},"CVE-2020-13935","The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service.","2020-07-14",7.5,0.86608,{"cveId":74,"description":75,"publishedDate":76,"cvssScore":77,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":40,"isKev":41,"epssScore":78},"CVE-2021-33037","Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP\u002F1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.","2021-07-12",5.3,0.74667,{"cveId":80,"description":81,"publishedDate":70,"cvssScore":71,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":55,"isKev":41,"epssScore":82},"CVE-2020-13934","An h2c direct connection to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M5 to 9.0.36 and 8.5.1 to 8.5.56 did not release the HTTP\u002F1.1 processor after the upgrade to HTTP\u002F2. If a sufficient number of such requests were made, an OutOfMemoryException could occur leading to a denial of service.",0.64124,{"cveId":84,"description":85,"publishedDate":86,"cvssScore":87,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":55,"isKev":41,"epssScore":88},"CVE-2020-9484","When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter=\"null\" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.","2020-05-20",7,0.5552,{"cveId":90,"description":91,"publishedDate":92,"cvssScore":93,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":40,"isKev":41,"epssScore":94},"CVE-2021-41184","jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of the `of` option of the `.position()` util from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. Any string value passed to the `of` option is now treated as a CSS selector. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `of` option from untrusted sources.","2021-10-26",6.5,0.40768,[96,101,104,108],{"cveId":63,"description":64,"publishedDate":65,"cvssScore":47,"severity":48,"isKev":4,"epssScore":66,"cisaVulnName":97,"cisaDateAdded":98,"cisaShortDescription":99,"cisaRequiredAction":100},"Apache Tomcat Remote Code Execution Vulnerability","2023-05-12","Apache Tomcat contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows for remote code execution if JmxRemoteLifecycleListener is used and an attacker can reach Java Management Extension (JMX) ports. This CVE exists because this listener wasn't updated for consistency with the Oracle patched issues for CVE-2016-3427 which affected credential types.","Apply updates per vendor instructions.",{"cveId":51,"description":52,"publishedDate":53,"cvssScore":54,"severity":55,"isKev":4,"epssScore":56,"cisaVulnName":97,"cisaDateAdded":102,"cisaShortDescription":103,"cisaRequiredAction":100},"2022-03-25","When running Apache Tomcat, it is possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server.",{"cveId":58,"description":59,"publishedDate":60,"cvssScore":47,"severity":48,"isKev":4,"epssScore":61,"cisaVulnName":105,"cisaDateAdded":106,"cisaShortDescription":107,"cisaRequiredAction":100},"Apache Tomcat Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability","2022-03-03","Apache Tomcat treats Apache JServ Protocol (AJP) connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited.",{"cveId":44,"description":45,"publishedDate":46,"cvssScore":47,"severity":48,"isKev":4,"epssScore":49,"cisaVulnName":109,"cisaDateAdded":110,"cisaShortDescription":111,"cisaRequiredAction":100},"Oracle WebLogic Server, Injection","2022-01-10","Injection vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services).",{"title":113,"metaDescription":114,"keywords":115,"structuredData":116},"Agile Plm by Oracle - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Agile Plm by Oracle covering 4 versions with 70 tracked vulnerabilities including 3 critical and 1 high-severity issues and 4 CISA KEV vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Agile Plm vulnerabilities, Agile Plm security, Agile Plm CVE, Oracle Agile Plm, Agile Plm threat intelligence, Oracle security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking, Agile Plm KEV, Agile Plm exploited vulnerabilities",{"@context":117,"@type":118,"name":119,"description":114,"url":120,"manufacturer":121,"applicationCategory":125,"softwareVersion":126,"mainEntity":127},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Agile Plm","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Foracle\u002Fagile_plm",{"@type":122,"name":123,"url":124},"Organization","Oracle","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Foracle","Security Software","4 versions tracked",{"@type":128,"name":129,"description":130,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":11},"SecurityVulnerability","Agile Plm Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Agile Plm by Oracle",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":9,"lastUpdated":11,"generatedAt":132,"apiVersion":133},"2026-10-17T14:25:23.861Z","3.0",[135,137],{"product":136,"cves":20},"agile_plm_mcad_connector",{"product":138,"cves":139},"agile_plm_framework",1,{"rows":141,"total":9,"capped":41,"failed":158},[142,146,150,154],{"cveId":63,"name":97,"severity":48,"cvss":47,"added":98,"epss":66,"published":143,"ranges":144,"checked":4,"hits":145,"covers":41},"2017-04-06T21:59:00.243",[22,25],[],{"cveId":51,"name":97,"severity":55,"cvss":54,"added":102,"epss":56,"published":147,"ranges":148,"checked":4,"hits":149,"covers":41},"2017-10-04T01:29:02.12",[14,18,22,25],[],{"cveId":58,"name":105,"severity":48,"cvss":47,"added":106,"epss":61,"published":151,"ranges":152,"checked":4,"hits":153,"covers":41},"2020-02-24T22:15:12.057",[14,22,25],[],{"cveId":44,"name":109,"severity":48,"cvss":47,"added":110,"epss":49,"published":155,"ranges":156,"checked":4,"hits":157,"covers":41},"2019-04-26T19:29:00.463",[14,18,22],[],0]