[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fhawJG_DMjw_Y-zvCMsyXZBigMux3XWnmEcS7rQIS90M":3,"g5a-family:oracle\u002Fenterprise_manager_base_platform":168,"g5a-ex:oracle\u002Fenterprise_manager_base_platform@*":169},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":63,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":82,"kevVulnerabilities":140,"seoMetadata":146,"meta":165},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":62},"oracle","enterprise_manager_base_platform",18,119,1,"2024-04-16",[14,18,20,23,25,28,31,33,35,38,40,43,46,49,51,54,56,59],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"11.1.0.1",0,false,{"version":19,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"11.2.0.4",{"version":21,"cve_count":22,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"12.1.0",2,{"version":24,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"12.1.0.4",{"version":26,"cve_count":27,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"12.1.0.5",40,{"version":29,"cve_count":30,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"12.1.0.5.0",8,{"version":32,"cve_count":22,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.1.0",{"version":34,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.1.0.0",{"version":36,"cve_count":37,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.2",4,{"version":39,"cve_count":22,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.2.0",{"version":41,"cve_count":42,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.2.0.0",36,{"version":44,"cve_count":45,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.2.0.0.0",10,{"version":47,"cve_count":48,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.2.1.0",6,{"version":50,"cve_count":37,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.3",{"version":52,"cve_count":53,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":4},"13.3.0.0",58,{"version":55,"cve_count":45,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.3.0.0.0",{"version":57,"cve_count":58,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":4},"13.4.0.0",54,{"version":60,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"13.5.0.0",23,"Enterprise Manager Base Platform by Oracle is a technology product with 18 tracked versions and 119 known security vulnerabilities including 1 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":19,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":21,"cve_count":22,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":24,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":26,"cve_count":27,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":29,"cve_count":30,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":32,"cve_count":22,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":34,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":36,"cve_count":37,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":39,"cve_count":22,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":41,"cve_count":42,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":44,"cve_count":45,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":47,"cve_count":48,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":50,"cve_count":37,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":52,"cve_count":53,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":4},{"version":55,"cve_count":45,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":57,"cve_count":58,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":4},{"version":60,"cve_count":61,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},[83,91,98,104,111,116,121,126,131,136],{"cveId":84,"description":85,"publishedDate":86,"cvssScore":87,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":89,"isKev":17,"epssScore":90},"CVE-2021-45105","Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.","2021-12-18",5.9,"v3.1","Medium",0.99999,{"cveId":92,"description":93,"publishedDate":94,"cvssScore":95,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":96,"isKev":4,"epssScore":97},"CVE-2018-11776","Apache Struts versions 2.3 to 2.3.34 and 2.5 to 2.5.16 suffer from possible Remote Code Execution when alwaysSelectFullNamespace is true (either by user or a plugin like Convention Plugin) and then: results are used with no namespace and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace and similar to results, same possibility when using url tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package have no or wildcard namespace.","2018-08-22",8.1,"High",0.99991,{"cveId":99,"description":100,"publishedDate":101,"cvssScore":102,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":96,"isKev":17,"epssScore":103},"CVE-2019-0227","A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue.","2019-05-01",7.5,0.9194,{"cveId":105,"description":106,"publishedDate":107,"cvssScore":108,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":109,"isKev":17,"epssScore":110},"CVE-2017-5645","In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.","2017-04-17",9.8,"Critical",0.89792,{"cveId":112,"description":113,"publishedDate":114,"cvssScore":102,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":96,"isKev":17,"epssScore":115},"CVE-2020-5398","In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a \"Content-Disposition\" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input.","2020-01-17",0.88768,{"cveId":117,"description":118,"publishedDate":119,"cvssScore":102,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":96,"isKev":17,"epssScore":120},"CVE-2021-4104","JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.","2021-12-14",0.80599,{"cveId":122,"description":123,"publishedDate":124,"cvssScore":108,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":109,"isKev":17,"epssScore":125},"CVE-2022-23305","By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.","2022-01-18",0.66537,{"cveId":127,"description":128,"publishedDate":129,"cvssScore":102,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":96,"isKev":17,"epssScore":130},"CVE-2021-34798","Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.","2021-09-16",0.64509,{"cveId":132,"description":133,"publishedDate":124,"cvssScore":134,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":96,"isKev":17,"epssScore":135},"CVE-2022-23302","JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.",8.8,0.63556,{"cveId":137,"description":138,"publishedDate":129,"cvssScore":102,"cvssVersion":88,"severity":96,"isKev":17,"epssScore":139},"CVE-2021-36160","A carefully crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy_uwsgi to read above the allocated memory and crash (DoS). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.30 to 2.4.48 (inclusive).",0.62887,[141],{"cveId":92,"description":93,"publishedDate":94,"cvssScore":95,"severity":96,"isKev":4,"epssScore":97,"cisaVulnName":142,"cisaDateAdded":143,"cisaShortDescription":144,"cisaRequiredAction":145},"Apache Struts Remote Code Execution Vulnerability","2021-11-03","Apache Struts contains a vulnerability that allows for remote code execution under two circumstances. One, where the alwaysSelectFullNamespace option is true and the value isn't set for a result defined in underlying configurations and in same time, its upper package configuration have no or wildcard namespace.  Or, using URL tag which doesn't have value and action set and in same time, its upper package configuration have no or wildcard namespace.","Apply updates per vendor instructions.",{"title":147,"metaDescription":148,"keywords":149,"structuredData":150},"Enterprise Manager Base Platform by Oracle - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Enterprise Manager Base Platform by Oracle covering 18 versions with 119 tracked vulnerabilities including 0 critical and 1 high-severity issues and 1 CISA KEV vulnerability. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Enterprise Manager Base Platform vulnerabilities, Enterprise Manager Base Platform security, Enterprise Manager Base Platform CVE, Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform, Enterprise Manager Base Platform threat intelligence, Oracle security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking, Enterprise Manager Base Platform KEV, Enterprise Manager Base Platform exploited vulnerabilities",{"@context":151,"@type":152,"name":153,"description":148,"url":154,"manufacturer":155,"applicationCategory":159,"softwareVersion":160,"mainEntity":161},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Enterprise Manager Base Platform","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Foracle\u002Fenterprise_manager_base_platform",{"@type":156,"name":157,"url":158},"Organization","Oracle","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Foracle","Security Software","18 versions tracked",{"@type":162,"name":163,"description":164,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Enterprise Manager Base Platform Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Enterprise Manager Base Platform by Oracle",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":166,"apiVersion":167},"2026-10-17T00:36:00.833Z","3.0",[],{"rows":170,"total":11,"capped":17,"failed":16},[171],{"cveId":92,"name":142,"severity":96,"cvss":95,"added":143,"epss":97,"published":172,"ranges":173,"checked":4,"hits":174,"covers":17},"2018-08-22T13:29:00.753",[52,57],[]]