[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fHnh5BU7yC1EO3w-7shQ_CJ4SPVsPnYm-sTnUS0GlIhQ":3,"g5a-ex:oracle\u002Fretail_predictive_application_server@*":259,"g5a-family:oracle\u002Fretail_predictive_application_server":261},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":127,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":178,"kevVulnerabilities":236,"seoMetadata":237,"meta":256},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":126},"oracle","retail_predictive_application_server",50,33,0,"2021-12-18",[14,17,19,21,23,25,27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41,43,45,47,49,51,53,55,57,59,61,63,66,68,70,73,76,79,81,83,86,88,90,93,96,98,100,103,105,108,110,112,115,117,119,121,124],{"version":15,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.0",false,{"version":18,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.0.1",{"version":20,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.0.2",{"version":22,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.0.3",{"version":24,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.0.3.8",{"version":26,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.0.4",{"version":28,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.0.4.20",{"version":30,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.0.4.26",{"version":32,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.1.1",{"version":34,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.1.2",{"version":36,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.2",{"version":38,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.2.0.2",{"version":40,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.2.1",{"version":42,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.2.2",{"version":44,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.2.3",{"version":46,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.3",{"version":48,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.3.1",{"version":50,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.3.1.0.1",{"version":52,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.3.2",{"version":54,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.3.3",{"version":56,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.4",{"version":58,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.4.1",{"version":60,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.4.2",{"version":62,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"13.4.3",{"version":64,"cve_count":65,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.0",5,{"version":67,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.0.1",{"version":69,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.0.2",{"version":71,"cve_count":72,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.0.3",4,{"version":74,"cve_count":75,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.0.3.26",3,{"version":77,"cve_count":78,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.1",7,{"version":80,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.1.1",{"version":82,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.1.2",{"version":84,"cve_count":85,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.1.3",8,{"version":87,"cve_count":65,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.1.3.0",{"version":89,"cve_count":75,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.1.3.37",{"version":91,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"14.1.3.46",2,{"version":94,"cve_count":95,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"15.0",6,{"version":97,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"15.0.1",{"version":99,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"15.0.2",{"version":101,"cve_count":102,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"15.0.3",17,{"version":104,"cve_count":65,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"15.0.3.0",{"version":106,"cve_count":107,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"15.0.3..100",1,{"version":109,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"15.0.3.100",{"version":111,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"15.0.3.115",{"version":113,"cve_count":114,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"16.0",9,{"version":116,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"16.0.1",{"version":118,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"16.0.2",{"version":120,"cve_count":85,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"16.0.3",{"version":122,"cve_count":123,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"16.0.3.0",14,{"version":125,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},"16.0.3.240","Retail Predictive Application Server by Oracle is a technology product with 50 tracked versions and 33 known security vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177],{"version":15,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":18,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":20,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":22,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":24,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":26,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":28,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":30,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":32,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":34,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":36,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":38,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":40,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":42,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":44,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":46,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":48,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":50,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":52,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":54,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":56,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":58,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":60,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":62,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":64,"cve_count":65,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":67,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":69,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":71,"cve_count":72,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":74,"cve_count":75,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":77,"cve_count":78,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":80,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":82,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":84,"cve_count":85,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":87,"cve_count":65,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":89,"cve_count":75,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":91,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":94,"cve_count":95,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":97,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":99,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":101,"cve_count":102,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":104,"cve_count":65,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":106,"cve_count":107,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":109,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":111,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":113,"cve_count":114,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":116,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":118,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":120,"cve_count":85,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":122,"cve_count":123,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},{"version":125,"cve_count":92,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":16},[179,186,193,200,205,210,215,219,225,231],{"cveId":180,"description":181,"publishedDate":12,"cvssScore":182,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":184,"isKev":16,"epssScore":185},"CVE-2021-45105","Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.",5.9,"v3.1","Medium",0.99999,{"cveId":187,"description":188,"publishedDate":189,"cvssScore":190,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":191,"isKev":16,"epssScore":192},"CVE-2017-5645","In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.","2017-04-17",9.8,"Critical",0.89792,{"cveId":194,"description":195,"publishedDate":196,"cvssScore":197,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":198,"isKev":16,"epssScore":199},"CVE-2020-5398","In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a \"Content-Disposition\" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input.","2020-01-17",7.5,"High",0.88768,{"cveId":201,"description":202,"publishedDate":203,"cvssScore":190,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":191,"isKev":16,"epssScore":204},"CVE-2018-1270","Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.","2018-04-06",0.77476,{"cveId":206,"description":207,"publishedDate":208,"cvssScore":190,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":191,"isKev":16,"epssScore":209},"CVE-2018-1275","Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.16 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. This CVE addresses the partial fix for CVE-2018-1270 in the 4.3.x branch of the Spring Framework.","2018-04-11",0.57414,{"cveId":211,"description":212,"publishedDate":213,"cvssScore":197,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":198,"isKev":16,"epssScore":214},"CVE-2016-8610","A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS\u002FSSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS\u002FSSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.","2017-11-13",0.39657,{"cveId":216,"description":217,"publishedDate":203,"cvssScore":182,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":184,"isKev":16,"epssScore":218},"CVE-2018-1271","Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.",0.34444,{"cveId":220,"description":221,"publishedDate":222,"cvssScore":223,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":198,"isKev":16,"epssScore":224},"CVE-2019-10086","In Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, a special BeanIntrospector class was added which allows suppressing the ability for an attacker to access the classloader via the class property available on all Java objects. We, however were not using this by default characteristic of the PropertyUtilsBean.","2019-08-20",7.3,0.28384,{"cveId":226,"description":227,"publishedDate":228,"cvssScore":229,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":184,"isKev":16,"epssScore":230},"CVE-2020-5421","In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter.","2020-09-19",6.5,0.11564,{"cveId":232,"description":233,"publishedDate":234,"cvssScore":197,"cvssVersion":183,"severity":198,"isKev":16,"epssScore":235},"CVE-2018-15756","Spring Framework, version 5.1, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.10, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.20, and older unsupported versions on the 4.2.x branch provide support for range requests when serving static resources through the ResourceHttpRequestHandler, or starting in 5.0 when an annotated controller returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. A malicious user (or attacker) can add a range header with a high number of ranges, or with wide ranges that overlap, or both, for a denial of service attack. This vulnerability affects applications that depend on either spring-webmvc or spring-webflux. Such applications must also have a registration for serving static resources (e.g. JS, CSS, images, and others), or have an annotated controller that returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. Spring Boot applications that depend on spring-boot-starter-web or spring-boot-starter-webflux are ready to serve static resources out of the box and are therefore vulnerable.","2018-10-18",0.09207,[],{"title":238,"metaDescription":239,"keywords":240,"structuredData":241},"Retail Predictive Application Server by Oracle - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Retail Predictive Application Server by Oracle covering 50 versions with 33 tracked vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Retail Predictive Application Server vulnerabilities, Retail Predictive Application Server security, Retail Predictive Application Server CVE, Oracle Retail Predictive Application Server, Retail Predictive Application Server threat intelligence, Oracle security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking",{"@context":242,"@type":243,"name":244,"description":239,"url":245,"manufacturer":246,"applicationCategory":250,"softwareVersion":251,"mainEntity":252},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Retail Predictive Application Server","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Foracle\u002Fretail_predictive_application_server",{"@type":247,"name":248,"url":249},"Organization","Oracle","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Foracle","Security Software","50 versions tracked",{"@type":253,"name":254,"description":255,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Retail Predictive Application Server Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Retail Predictive Application Server by Oracle",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":257,"apiVersion":258},"2026-10-17T12:56:22.534Z","3.0",{"rows":260,"total":11,"capped":16,"failed":11},[],[]]