[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f3XthnvWmyecQXTsp6oJ0bFNyCJ_inREiIgxnLC4LWps":3,"g5a-family:redhat\u002Fopenshift_service_mesh":124,"g5a-ex:redhat\u002Fopenshift_service_mesh@*":125},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":35,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":44,"kevVulnerabilities":97,"seoMetadata":102,"meta":121},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":34},"redhat","openshift_service_mesh",8,21,1,"2024-09-19",[14,19,21,23,25,28,30,32],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},"1.0",13,0,false,{"version":20,"cve_count":17,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},"1.0.7",{"version":22,"cve_count":17,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},"1.0.8",{"version":24,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},"1.0.9",{"version":26,"cve_count":27,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":4},"2.0",5,{"version":29,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},"2.3.1",{"version":31,"cve_count":17,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},"2.5.6",{"version":33,"cve_count":17,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},"2.6.3","Openshift Service Mesh by Redhat is a technology product with 8 tracked versions and 21 known security vulnerabilities including 1 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},{"version":20,"cve_count":17,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},{"version":22,"cve_count":17,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},{"version":24,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},{"version":26,"cve_count":27,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":4},{"version":29,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},{"version":31,"cve_count":17,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},{"version":33,"cve_count":17,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":18},[45,53,58,62,66,70,76,80,84,91],{"cveId":46,"description":47,"publishedDate":48,"cvssScore":49,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":51,"isKev":4,"epssScore":52},"CVE-2023-44487","The HTTP\u002F2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.","2023-10-10",7.5,"v3.1","High",0.99999,{"cveId":54,"description":55,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":49,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":51,"isKev":18,"epssScore":57},"CVE-2019-9515","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.","2019-08-13",0.87399,{"cveId":59,"description":60,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":49,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":51,"isKev":18,"epssScore":61},"CVE-2019-9514","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.",0.82813,{"cveId":63,"description":64,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":49,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":51,"isKev":18,"epssScore":65},"CVE-2019-9513","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.",0.81556,{"cveId":67,"description":68,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":49,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":51,"isKev":18,"epssScore":69},"CVE-2019-9511","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.",0.59547,{"cveId":71,"description":72,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":73,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":74,"isKev":18,"epssScore":75},"CVE-2019-9516","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.",6.5,"Medium",0.56262,{"cveId":77,"description":78,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":49,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":51,"isKev":18,"epssScore":79},"CVE-2019-9517","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP\u002F2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.",0.2789,{"cveId":81,"description":82,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":49,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":51,"isKev":18,"epssScore":83},"CVE-2019-9518","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and\u002For PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU.",0.25448,{"cveId":85,"description":86,"publishedDate":87,"cvssScore":88,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":89,"isKev":18,"epssScore":90},"CVE-2020-27846","A signature verification vulnerability exists in crewjam\u002Fsaml. This flaw allows an attacker to bypass SAML Authentication. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.","2020-12-21",9.8,"Critical",0.04931,{"cveId":92,"description":93,"publishedDate":94,"cvssScore":95,"cvssVersion":50,"severity":51,"isKev":18,"epssScore":96},"CVE-2019-9900","When parsing HTTP\u002F1.x header values, Envoy 1.9.0 and before does not reject embedded zero characters (NUL, ASCII 0x0). This allows remote attackers crafting header values containing embedded NUL characters to potentially bypass header matching rules, gaining access to unauthorized resources.","2019-04-25",8.3,0.03732,[98],{"cveId":46,"description":47,"publishedDate":48,"cvssScore":49,"severity":51,"isKev":4,"epssScore":52,"cisaVulnName":99,"cisaDateAdded":48,"cisaShortDescription":100,"cisaRequiredAction":101},"HTTP\u002F2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability","HTTP\u002F2 contains a rapid reset vulnerability that allows for a distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS).","Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",{"title":103,"metaDescription":104,"keywords":105,"structuredData":106},"Openshift Service Mesh by Redhat - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Openshift Service Mesh by Redhat covering 8 versions with 21 tracked vulnerabilities including 0 critical and 1 high-severity issues and 1 CISA KEV vulnerability. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Openshift Service Mesh vulnerabilities, Openshift Service Mesh security, Openshift Service Mesh CVE, Redhat Openshift Service Mesh, Openshift Service Mesh threat intelligence, Redhat security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking, Openshift Service Mesh KEV, Openshift Service Mesh exploited vulnerabilities",{"@context":107,"@type":108,"name":109,"description":104,"url":110,"manufacturer":111,"applicationCategory":115,"softwareVersion":116,"mainEntity":117},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Openshift Service Mesh","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Fredhat\u002Fopenshift_service_mesh",{"@type":112,"name":113,"url":114},"Organization","Redhat","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Fredhat","Security Software","8 versions tracked",{"@type":118,"name":119,"description":120,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Openshift Service Mesh Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Openshift Service Mesh by Redhat",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":122,"apiVersion":123},"2026-10-18T18:52:09.335Z","3.0",[],{"rows":126,"total":11,"capped":18,"failed":17},[127],{"cveId":46,"name":99,"severity":51,"cvss":49,"added":48,"epss":52,"published":128,"ranges":129,"checked":4,"hits":130,"covers":18},"2023-10-10T14:15:10.883",[26],[]]