[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fMna7i_nBqgRlU-eg-SeEq6Auys0bOoQJ_U1Wno-DOBc":3,"g5a-ex:siemens\u002Fsinec_ins@*":108,"g5a-family:siemens\u002Fsinec_ins":110},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":21,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":24,"kevVulnerabilities":85,"seoMetadata":86,"meta":105},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":20},"siemens","sinec_ins",2,37,0,"2024-11-12",[14,18],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"1.0",36,false,{"version":19,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},"1.0.1.1","Sinec Ins by Siemens is a technology product with 2 tracked versions and 37 known security vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[22,23],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},{"version":19,"cve_count":11,"kev_count":11,"has_kev":17},[25,33,40,44,50,56,62,68,73,80],{"cveId":26,"description":27,"publishedDate":28,"cvssScore":29,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":31,"isKev":17,"epssScore":32},"CVE-2022-2068","In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).","2022-06-21",7.3,"v3.1","High",0.96391,{"cveId":34,"description":35,"publishedDate":36,"cvssScore":37,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":38,"isKev":17,"epssScore":39},"CVE-2022-32215","The llhttp parser \u003Cv14.20.1, \u003Cv16.17.1 and \u003Cv18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly handle multi-line Transfer-Encoding headers. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS).","2022-07-14",6.5,"Medium",0.70244,{"cveId":41,"description":42,"publishedDate":36,"cvssScore":37,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":38,"isKev":17,"epssScore":43},"CVE-2022-32213","The llhttp parser \u003Cv14.20.1, \u003Cv16.17.1 and \u003Cv18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly parse and validate Transfer-Encoding headers and can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS).",0.45956,{"cveId":45,"description":46,"publishedDate":47,"cvssScore":48,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":31,"isKev":17,"epssScore":49},"CVE-2022-45092","A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions \u003C V1.0 SP2 Update 1). An authenticated remote attacker with access to the Web Based Management (443\u002Ftcp) of the affected product, could potentially read and write arbitrary files from and to the device's file system. An attacker might leverage this to trigger remote code execution on the affected component.","2023-01-10",8.8,0.31443,{"cveId":51,"description":52,"publishedDate":53,"cvssScore":54,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":31,"isKev":17,"epssScore":55},"CVE-2021-23337","Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function.","2021-02-15",7.2,0.21333,{"cveId":57,"description":58,"publishedDate":59,"cvssScore":60,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":31,"isKev":17,"epssScore":61},"CVE-2021-3749","axios is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity","2021-08-31",7.5,0.08515,{"cveId":63,"description":64,"publishedDate":65,"cvssScore":66,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":38,"isKev":17,"epssScore":67},"CVE-2021-23841","The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).","2021-02-16",5.9,0.0741,{"cveId":69,"description":70,"publishedDate":53,"cvssScore":71,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":38,"isKev":17,"epssScore":72},"CVE-2020-28500","Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions.",5.3,0.07336,{"cveId":74,"description":75,"publishedDate":76,"cvssScore":77,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":78,"isKev":17,"epssScore":79},"CVE-2021-22945","When sending data to an MQTT server, libcurl \u003C= 7.73.0 and 7.78.0 could in some circumstances erroneously keep a pointer to an already freed memory area and both use that again in a subsequent call to send data and also free it *again*.","2021-09-23",9.1,"Critical",0.06677,{"cveId":81,"description":82,"publishedDate":36,"cvssScore":83,"cvssVersion":30,"severity":31,"isKev":17,"epssScore":84},"CVE-2022-32212","A OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in Node.js versions \u003C14.20.0, \u003C16.20.0, \u003C18.5.0 due to an insufficient IsAllowedHost check that can easily be bypassed because IsIPAddress does not properly check if an IP address is invalid before making DBS requests allowing rebinding attacks.",8.1,0.06432,[],{"title":87,"metaDescription":88,"keywords":89,"structuredData":90},"Sinec Ins by Siemens - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Sinec Ins by Siemens covering 2 versions with 37 tracked vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Sinec Ins vulnerabilities, Sinec Ins security, Sinec Ins CVE, Siemens Sinec Ins, Sinec Ins threat intelligence, Siemens security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking",{"@context":91,"@type":92,"name":93,"description":88,"url":94,"manufacturer":95,"applicationCategory":99,"softwareVersion":100,"mainEntity":101},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Sinec Ins","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Fsiemens\u002Fsinec_ins",{"@type":96,"name":97,"url":98},"Organization","Siemens","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Fsiemens","Security Software","2 versions tracked",{"@type":102,"name":103,"description":104,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Sinec Ins Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Sinec Ins by Siemens",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":106,"apiVersion":107},"2026-10-17T13:19:42.414Z","3.0",{"rows":109,"total":11,"capped":17,"failed":11},[],[]]