[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fP0WP5myYMgRdkc5N7vYJMpK9tCVBzKHcRWUpq9yHt1A":3,"g5a-family:sonicwall\u002Femail_security":124,"g5a-ex:sonicwall\u002Femail_security@*":130},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":19,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":21,"kevVulnerabilities":82,"seoMetadata":102,"meta":121},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":18},"sonicwall","email_security",1,10,5,"2023-02-14",[14],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"10.0.9",0,false,"Email Security by Sonicwall is a technology product with 1 tracked version and 10 known security vulnerabilities including 5 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[20],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},[22,29,35,41,47,53,59,66,71,76],{"cveId":23,"description":24,"publishedDate":25,"cvssScore":10,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":27,"isKev":4,"epssScore":28},"CVE-2021-44228","Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects.","2021-12-10","v3.1","Critical",0.99999,{"cveId":30,"description":31,"publishedDate":32,"cvssScore":33,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":34,"isKev":17,"epssScore":28},"CVE-2021-45105","Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.","2021-12-18",5.9,"Medium",{"cveId":36,"description":37,"publishedDate":38,"cvssScore":39,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":27,"isKev":4,"epssScore":40},"CVE-2021-45046","It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default.","2021-12-14",9,0.99977,{"cveId":42,"description":43,"publishedDate":44,"cvssScore":45,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":27,"isKev":4,"epssScore":46},"CVE-2021-20021","A vulnerability in the SonicWall Email Security version 10.0.9.x allows an attacker to create an administrative account by sending a crafted HTTP request to the remote host.","2021-04-09",9.8,0.8878,{"cveId":48,"description":49,"publishedDate":50,"cvssScore":51,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":34,"isKev":17,"epssScore":52},"CVE-2018-3639","Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4.","2018-05-22",5.5,0.60631,{"cveId":54,"description":55,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":57,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":34,"isKev":4,"epssScore":58},"CVE-2021-20023","SonicWall Email Security version 10.0.9.x contains a vulnerability that allows a post-authenticated attacker to read an arbitrary file on the remote host.","2021-04-20",4.9,0.51689,{"cveId":60,"description":61,"publishedDate":62,"cvssScore":63,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":64,"isKev":17,"epssScore":65},"CVE-2021-3450","The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a \"purpose\" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named \"purpose\" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).","2021-03-25",7.4,"High",0.18339,{"cveId":67,"description":68,"publishedDate":44,"cvssScore":69,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":64,"isKev":4,"epssScore":70},"CVE-2021-20022","SonicWall Email Security version 10.0.9.x contains a vulnerability that allows a post-authenticated attacker to upload an arbitrary file to the remote host.",7.2,0.16639,{"cveId":72,"description":73,"publishedDate":12,"cvssScore":74,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":34,"isKev":17,"epssScore":75},"CVE-2023-0655","SonicWall Email Security contains a vulnerability that could permit a remote unauthenticated attacker access to an error page that includes sensitive information about users email addresses.",5.3,0.00717,{"cveId":77,"description":78,"publishedDate":79,"cvssScore":80,"cvssVersion":26,"severity":64,"isKev":17,"epssScore":81},"CVE-2022-2324","Improperly Implemented Security Check vulnerability in the SonicWall Hosted Email Security leads to bypass of Capture ATP security service in the appliance. This vulnerability impacts 10.0.17.7319 and earlier versions","2022-07-29",7.5,0.00635,[83,88,92,96,99],{"cveId":36,"description":37,"publishedDate":38,"cvssScore":39,"severity":27,"isKev":4,"epssScore":40,"cisaVulnName":84,"cisaDateAdded":85,"cisaShortDescription":86,"cisaRequiredAction":87},"Apache Log4j2 Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability","2023-05-01","Apache Log4j2 contains a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability due to the incomplete fix of CVE-2021-44228, where the Thread Context Lookup Pattern is vulnerable to remote code execution in certain non-default configurations.","Apply updates per vendor instructions.",{"cveId":23,"description":24,"publishedDate":25,"cvssScore":10,"severity":27,"isKev":4,"epssScore":28,"cisaVulnName":89,"cisaDateAdded":25,"cisaShortDescription":90,"cisaRequiredAction":91},"Apache Log4j2 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability","Apache Log4j2 contains a vulnerability where JNDI features do not protect against attacker-controlled JNDI-related endpoints, allowing for remote code execution.","For all affected software assets for which updates exist, the only acceptable remediation actions are: 1) Apply updates; OR 2) remove affected assets from agency networks. Temporary mitigations using one of the measures provided at https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cisa.gov\u002Fuscert\u002Fed-22-02-apache-log4j-recommended-mitigation-measures are only acceptable until updates are available.",{"cveId":42,"description":43,"publishedDate":44,"cvssScore":45,"severity":27,"isKev":4,"epssScore":46,"cisaVulnName":93,"cisaDateAdded":94,"cisaShortDescription":95,"cisaRequiredAction":87},"SonicWall Email Security Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability","2021-11-03","SonicWall Email Security contains an improper privilege management vulnerability that allows an attacker to create an administrative account by sending a crafted HTTP request to the remote host. This vulnerability has known usage in a SonicWall Email Security exploit chain along with CVE-2021-20022 and CVE-2021-20023 to achieve privilege escalation.",{"cveId":67,"description":68,"publishedDate":44,"cvssScore":69,"severity":64,"isKev":4,"epssScore":70,"cisaVulnName":97,"cisaDateAdded":94,"cisaShortDescription":98,"cisaRequiredAction":87},"SonicWall Email Security Unrestricted Upload of File Vulnerability","SonicWall Email Security contains an unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type vulnerability that allows a post-authenticated attacker to upload a file to the remote host. This vulnerability has known usage in a SonicWall Email Security exploit chain along with CVE-2021-20021 and CVE-2021-20023 to achieve privilege escalation.",{"cveId":54,"description":55,"publishedDate":56,"cvssScore":57,"severity":34,"isKev":4,"epssScore":58,"cisaVulnName":100,"cisaDateAdded":94,"cisaShortDescription":101,"cisaRequiredAction":87},"SonicWall Email Security Path Traversal Vulnerability","SonicWall Email Security contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows a post-authenticated attacker to read files on the remote host. This vulnerability has known usage in a SonicWall Email Security exploit chain along with CVE-2021-20021 and CVE-2021-20022 to achieve privilege escalation.",{"title":103,"metaDescription":104,"keywords":105,"structuredData":106},"Email Security by Sonicwall - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Email Security by Sonicwall covering 1 version with 10 tracked vulnerabilities including 3 critical and 1 high-severity issues and 5 CISA KEV vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Email Security vulnerabilities, Email Security security, Email Security CVE, Sonicwall Email Security, Email Security threat intelligence, Sonicwall security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking, Email Security KEV, Email Security exploited vulnerabilities",{"@context":107,"@type":108,"name":109,"description":104,"url":110,"manufacturer":111,"applicationCategory":115,"softwareVersion":116,"mainEntity":117},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Email Security","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Fsonicwall\u002Femail_security",{"@type":112,"name":113,"url":114},"Organization","Sonicwall","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Fsonicwall","Security Software","1 versions tracked",{"@type":118,"name":119,"description":120,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Email Security Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Email Security by Sonicwall",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":122,"apiVersion":123},"2026-10-17T12:28:05.263Z","3.0",[125,128],{"product":126,"cves":127},"email_security_appliance",3,{"product":129,"cves":9},"email_security_virtual_appliance",{"rows":131,"total":11,"capped":17,"failed":16},[132,137,142,147,151],{"cveId":36,"name":84,"severity":27,"cvss":39,"added":85,"epss":40,"published":133,"ranges":134,"checked":4,"hits":136,"covers":17},"2021-12-14T19:15:07.733",[135],"before 10.0.12",[],{"cveId":23,"name":89,"severity":27,"cvss":10,"added":25,"epss":28,"published":138,"ranges":139,"checked":4,"hits":141,"covers":17},"2021-12-10T10:15:09.143",[140],"before 10.0.13",[],{"cveId":42,"name":93,"severity":27,"cvss":45,"added":94,"epss":46,"published":143,"ranges":144,"checked":4,"hits":146,"covers":17},"2021-04-09T18:15:13.38",[145],"before 10.0.9.6103",[],{"cveId":67,"name":97,"severity":64,"cvss":69,"added":94,"epss":70,"published":148,"ranges":149,"checked":4,"hits":150,"covers":17},"2021-04-09T18:15:13.46",[145],[],{"cveId":54,"name":100,"severity":34,"cvss":57,"added":94,"epss":58,"published":152,"ranges":153,"checked":4,"hits":155,"covers":17},"2021-04-20T12:15:12.587",[154],"before 10.0.9.6173",[]]