[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fpl5mYVqw-K4HUOOQUF2d5jipaLNJ5_TOtIFq9yRei8A":3,"g5a-family:tenable\u002Ftenable.sc":146,"g5a-ex:tenable\u002Ftenable.sc@*":147},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":42,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":55,"kevVulnerabilities":115,"seoMetadata":124,"meta":143},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":41},"tenable","tenable.sc",12,46,2,"2023-02-01",[14,18,21,23,25,27,29,31,33,35,37,39],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.13.0",0,false,{"version":19,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.14.0",1,{"version":22,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.14.1",{"version":24,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.16.0",{"version":26,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.17.0",{"version":28,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.18.0",{"version":30,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.19.0",{"version":32,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.19.1",{"version":34,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.20.0",{"version":36,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.20.1",{"version":38,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.21.0",{"version":40,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},"5.23.1","Tenable.sc by Tenable is a technology product with 12 tracked versions and 46 known security vulnerabilities including 2 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":19,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":22,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":24,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":26,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":28,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":30,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":32,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":34,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":36,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":38,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},{"version":40,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":16,"has_kev":17},[56,64,71,77,82,87,92,99,104,109],{"cveId":57,"description":58,"publishedDate":59,"cvssScore":60,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":62,"isKev":4,"epssScore":63},"CVE-2021-40438","A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.","2021-09-16",9,"v3.1","Critical",0.99999,{"cveId":65,"description":66,"publishedDate":67,"cvssScore":68,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":69,"isKev":4,"epssScore":70},"CVE-2019-11043","In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it is possible to cause FPM module to write past allocated buffers into the space reserved for FCGI protocol data, thus opening the possibility of remote code execution.","2019-10-28",8.7,"High",0.99748,{"cveId":72,"description":73,"publishedDate":74,"cvssScore":75,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":62,"isKev":17,"epssScore":76},"CVE-2021-44790","A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from Lua scripts). The Apache httpd team is not aware of an exploit for the vulnerabilty though it might be possible to craft one. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier.","2021-12-20",9.8,0.9684,{"cveId":78,"description":79,"publishedDate":80,"cvssScore":75,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":62,"isKev":17,"epssScore":81},"CVE-2021-3711","In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the \"out\" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the \"outlen\" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the \"out\" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).","2021-08-24",0.87816,{"cveId":83,"description":84,"publishedDate":74,"cvssScore":85,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":69,"isKev":17,"epssScore":86},"CVE-2021-44224","A crafted URI sent to httpd configured as a forward proxy (ProxyRequests on) can cause a crash (NULL pointer dereference) or, for configurations mixing forward and reverse proxy declarations, can allow for requests to be directed to a declared Unix Domain Socket endpoint (Server Side Request Forgery). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.7 up to 2.4.51 (included).",8.2,0.82295,{"cveId":88,"description":89,"publishedDate":59,"cvssScore":90,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":69,"isKev":17,"epssScore":91},"CVE-2021-34798","Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.",7.5,0.64509,{"cveId":93,"description":94,"publishedDate":95,"cvssScore":96,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":97,"isKev":17,"epssScore":98},"CVE-2021-3449","An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).","2021-03-25",5.9,"Medium",0.63542,{"cveId":100,"description":101,"publishedDate":80,"cvssScore":102,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":69,"isKev":17,"epssScore":103},"CVE-2021-3712","ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own \"d2i\" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the \"data\" and \"length\" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the \"data\" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).",7.4,0.50445,{"cveId":105,"description":106,"publishedDate":107,"cvssScore":90,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":69,"isKev":17,"epssScore":108},"CVE-2021-33193","A crafted method sent through HTTP\u002F2 will bypass validation and be forwarded by mod_proxy, which can lead to request splitting or cache poisoning. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 to 2.4.48.","2021-08-16",0.46179,{"cveId":110,"description":111,"publishedDate":112,"cvssScore":113,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":97,"isKev":17,"epssScore":114},"CVE-2021-41184","jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of the `of` option of the `.position()` util from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. Any string value passed to the `of` option is now treated as a CSS selector. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `of` option from untrusted sources.","2021-10-26",6.5,0.40768,[116,121],{"cveId":65,"description":66,"publishedDate":67,"cvssScore":68,"severity":69,"isKev":4,"epssScore":70,"cisaVulnName":117,"cisaDateAdded":118,"cisaShortDescription":119,"cisaRequiredAction":120},"PHP FastCGI Process Manager (FPM) Buffer Overflow Vulnerability","2022-03-25","In some versions of PHP in certain configurations of FPM setup, it is possible to cause FPM module to write past allocated buffers allowing the possibility of remote code execution.","Apply updates per vendor instructions.",{"cveId":57,"description":58,"publishedDate":59,"cvssScore":60,"severity":62,"isKev":4,"epssScore":63,"cisaVulnName":122,"cisaDateAdded":123,"cisaShortDescription":58,"cisaRequiredAction":120},"Apache HTTP Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)","2021-12-01",{"title":125,"metaDescription":126,"keywords":127,"structuredData":128},"Tenable.sc by Tenable - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Tenable.sc by Tenable covering 12 versions with 46 tracked vulnerabilities including 1 critical and 1 high-severity issues and 2 CISA KEV vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Tenable.sc vulnerabilities, Tenable.sc security, Tenable.sc CVE, Tenable Tenable.sc, Tenable.sc threat intelligence, Tenable security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking, Tenable.sc KEV, Tenable.sc exploited vulnerabilities",{"@context":129,"@type":130,"name":131,"description":126,"url":132,"manufacturer":133,"applicationCategory":137,"softwareVersion":138,"mainEntity":139},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Tenable.sc","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Ftenable\u002Ftenable.sc",{"@type":134,"name":135,"url":136},"Organization","Tenable","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Ftenable","Security Software","12 versions tracked",{"@type":140,"name":141,"description":142,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Tenable.sc Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Tenable.sc by Tenable",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":144,"apiVersion":145},"2026-10-17T14:25:22.568Z","3.0",[],{"rows":148,"total":11,"capped":17,"failed":16},[149,154],{"cveId":65,"name":117,"severity":69,"cvss":68,"added":118,"epss":70,"published":150,"ranges":151,"checked":4,"hits":153,"covers":17},"2019-10-28T15:15:13.863",[152],"before 5.19.0",[],{"cveId":57,"name":122,"severity":62,"cvss":60,"added":123,"epss":63,"published":155,"ranges":156,"checked":4,"hits":158,"covers":17},"2021-09-16T15:15:07.633",[157],"up to 5.19.1",[]]