[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fP9MtC6h0tDiunn44TaZOFPpNUt9o4AytjPY27e4t4_U":3},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"vendor":6,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":33,"kevVulnerabilities":95,"topProductsByCves":101,"seoMetadata":105,"meta":114},{"vendorId":7,"vendorName":8,"productCount":9,"cveCount":10,"kevCount":11,"versionCount":12,"lastCveUpdate":13,"firstLetter":14,"products":15,"description":32},10653,"filezilla-project",3,13,1,243,"2026-04-05","f",[16,22,28],{"id":17,"product_name":18,"version_count":19,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"last_cve_update":21},45506,"filezilla_server",40,7,"2022-07-17",{"id":23,"product_name":24,"version_count":25,"cve_count":26,"kev_count":27,"last_cve_update":13},45505,"filezilla_client",197,6,0,{"id":29,"product_name":30,"version_count":26,"cve_count":27,"kev_count":27,"last_cve_update":31},45504,"filezilla",null,"Filezilla-project is a technology vendor with 3 tracked products and 13 known security vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this vendor.",[34,42,49,56,63,68,74,80,86,89],{"cveId":35,"description":36,"publishedDate":37,"cvssScore":38,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":40,"isKev":4,"epssScore":41},"CVE-2014-0160","The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug.","2014-04-07",7.5,"v3.1","High",0.99999,{"cveId":43,"description":44,"publishedDate":45,"cvssScore":46,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":40,"isKev":47,"epssScore":48},"CVE-2014-0224","OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the \"CCS Injection\" vulnerability.","2014-06-05",7.4,false,0.95326,{"cveId":50,"description":51,"publishedDate":52,"cvssScore":53,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":54,"isKev":47,"epssScore":55},"CVE-2023-48795","The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang\u002FOTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org\u002Fx\u002Fcrypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust.","2023-12-18",5.9,"Medium",0.93547,{"cveId":57,"description":58,"publishedDate":59,"cvssScore":60,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":54,"isKev":47,"epssScore":62},"CVE-2006-6565","FileZilla Server before 0.9.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a wildcard argument to the (1) LIST or (2) NLST commands, which results in a NULL pointer dereference, a different set of vectors than CVE-2006-6564.  NOTE: CVE analysis suggests that the problem might be due to a malformed PORT command.","2006-12-15",4,"v2",0.70588,{"cveId":64,"description":65,"publishedDate":66,"cvssScore":53,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":54,"isKev":47,"epssScore":67},"CVE-2024-31497","In PuTTY 0.68 through 0.80 before 0.81, biased ECDSA nonce generation allows an attacker to recover a user's NIST P-521 secret key via a quick attack in approximately 60 signatures. This is especially important in a scenario where an adversary is able to read messages signed by PuTTY or Pageant. The required set of signed messages may be publicly readable because they are stored in a public Git service that supports use of SSH for commit signing, and the signatures were made by Pageant through an agent-forwarding mechanism. In other words, an adversary may already have enough signature information to compromise a victim's private key, even if there is no further use of vulnerable PuTTY versions. After a key compromise, an adversary may be able to conduct supply-chain attacks on software maintained in Git. A second, independent scenario is that the adversary is an operator of an SSH server to which the victim authenticates (for remote login or file copy), even though this server is not fully trusted by the victim, and the victim uses the same private key for SSH connections to other services operated by other entities. Here, the rogue server operator (who would otherwise have no way to determine the victim's private key) can derive the victim's private key, and then use it for unauthorized access to those other services. If the other services include Git services, then again it may be possible to conduct supply-chain attacks on software maintained in Git. This also affects, for example, FileZilla before 3.67.0, WinSCP before 6.3.3, TortoiseGit before 2.15.0.1, and TortoiseSVN through 1.14.6.","2024-04-15",0.05773,{"cveId":69,"description":70,"publishedDate":71,"cvssScore":72,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":54,"isKev":47,"epssScore":73},"CVE-2009-0884","Buffer overflow in FileZilla Server before 0.9.31 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors related to SSL\u002FTLS packets.","2009-03-12",4.3,0.03421,{"cveId":75,"description":76,"publishedDate":77,"cvssScore":78,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":40,"isKev":47,"epssScore":79},"CVE-2019-5429","Untrusted search path in FileZilla before 3.41.0-rc1 allows an attacker to gain privileges via a malicious 'fzsftp' binary in the user's home directory.","2019-04-29",7.8,0.02838,{"cveId":81,"description":82,"publishedDate":83,"cvssScore":84,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":54,"isKev":47,"epssScore":85},"CVE-2005-0850","FileZilla FTP server before 0.9.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request for a filename containing an MS-DOS device name such as CON, NUL, COM1, LPT1, and others.","2005-05-02",5,0.0219,{"cveId":87,"description":88,"publishedDate":83,"cvssScore":84,"cvssVersion":61,"severity":54,"isKev":47,"epssScore":85},"CVE-2005-0851","FileZilla FTP server before 0.9.6, when using MODE Z (zlib compression), allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via certain file uploads or directory listings.",{"cveId":90,"description":91,"publishedDate":92,"cvssScore":93,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":54,"isKev":47,"epssScore":94},"CVE-2022-29620","FileZilla v3.59.0 allows attackers to obtain cleartext passwords of connected SSH or FTP servers via a memory dump.- NOTE: the vendor does not consider this a vulnerability","2022-06-07",6.5,0.01855,[96],{"cveId":35,"description":36,"publishedDate":37,"cvssScore":38,"cvssVersion":39,"severity":40,"isKev":4,"epssScore":41,"cisaVulnName":97,"cisaDateAdded":98,"cisaShortDescription":99,"cisaRequiredAction":100},"OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability","2022-05-04","The TLS and DTLS implementations in OpenSSL do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information.","Apply updates per vendor instructions.",[102,103,104],{"id":17,"product_name":18,"version_count":19,"cve_count":20,"kev_count":11,"last_cve_update":21},{"id":23,"product_name":24,"version_count":25,"cve_count":26,"kev_count":27,"last_cve_update":13},{"id":29,"product_name":30,"version_count":26,"cve_count":27,"kev_count":27,"last_cve_update":31},{"title":106,"metaDescription":107,"keywords":108,"structuredData":109},"Filezilla-project - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive security analysis for Filezilla-project covering 3 products with 13 tracked vulnerabilities including 0 critical and 1 high-severity issues and 1 CISA KEV vulnerability. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Filezilla-project vulnerabilities, Filezilla-project security, Filezilla-project CVE, Filezilla-project threat intelligence, vendor security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking, Filezilla-project KEV, Filezilla-project exploited vulnerabilities",{"@context":110,"@type":111,"name":112,"description":107,"url":113},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","Organization","Filezilla-project","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fvendors\u002Ffilezilla-project",{"totalProducts":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":13,"generatedAt":115,"apiVersion":116},"2026-10-18T22:14:57.778Z","3.0"]