[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f404LUEsJ-lEfSp6BtUZvreVYBC8jlNWGez3PA8IDfXg":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2004-0480":139},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":137},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":32,"epssPercentile":28,"epssTimeSeries":33,"severity":34,"affectedProducts":35,"affectedProductsCount":44,"references":45,"referencesCount":12,"weaknesses":82,"weaknessesCount":91,"isActivelyExploited":30,"cisaInfo":28,"otxData":28,"relatedBlogPosts":92,"seoMetadata":93,"configurations":118,"relatedVendorCves":128,"notableEvents":129},"CVE-2004-0480","What is CVE-2004-0480?","Argument injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0.3 and 6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a notes: URI that uses a UNC network share pathname to provide an alternate notes.ini configuration file to notes.exe.","Argument injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0.3 and 6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a notes: URI that uses a UNC network ...","2004-12-06T05:00:00","2026-06-16T22:05:42.957",10,"AV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FAu:N\u002FC:C\u002FI:C\u002FA:C",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":17,"CVSSMetricV40":31},[],[],[18],{"Source":19,"Type":20,"CVSSData":21,"BaseSeverity":29,"ExploitabilityScore":12,"ImpactScore":12,"ACInsufInfo":30,"ObtainAllPrivilege":4,"ObtainUserPrivilege":30,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":30,"UserInteractionRequired":30},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":22,"VectorString":13,"AccessVector":23,"AccessComplexity":24,"Authentication":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":26,"IntegrityImpact":26,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":27,"Exploitability":28,"RemediationLevel":28,"ReportConfidence":28,"TemporalScore":28,"CollateralDamagePotential":28,"TargetDistribution":28,"ConfidentialityRequirement":28,"IntegrityRequirement":28,"AvailabilityRequirement":28,"EnvironmentalScore":28},"2.0","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","COMPLETE","",null,"HIGH",false,[],0.08647,[32,32,32,32,32,32,32],"Critical",[36,41],{"vendor":37,"product":38,"version":39,"criteria":40,"vulnerable":4},"ibm","lotus_notes","6.0.3","cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":37,"product":38,"version":42,"criteria":43,"vulnerable":4},"6.5","cpe:2.3:a:ibm:lotus_notes:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",2,[46,51,58,63,68,72,74,76,78,80],{"url":47,"source":48,"tags":49},"http:\u002F\u002Fmarc.info\u002F?l=bugtraq&m=108843896506099&w=2","Marc",[50],"Third Party Advisory",{"url":52,"source":53,"tags":54},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww-1.ibm.com\u002Fsupport\u002Fdocview.wss?rs=475\u002Fcontext=SSKTWP&uid=swg21169510","Ibm",[55,56,57],"Broken Link","Patch","Vendor Advisory",{"url":59,"source":60,"tags":61},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.idefense.com\u002Fapplication\u002Fpoi\u002Fdisplay?id=111&type=vulnerabilities","Idefense",[55,62,56,57],"Exploit",{"url":64,"source":65,"tags":66},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Fbid\u002F10600","Securityfocus",[55,56,50,67,57],"VDB Entry",{"url":69,"source":70,"tags":71},"https:\u002F\u002Fexchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002F16496","Ibmcloud",[50,67],{"url":47,"source":48,"tags":73},[50],{"url":52,"source":53,"tags":75},[55,56,57],{"url":59,"source":60,"tags":77},[55,62,56,57],{"url":64,"source":65,"tags":79},[55,56,50,67,57],{"url":69,"source":70,"tags":81},[50,67],[83],{"id":84,"name":85,"description":86,"extendedDescription":87,"status":88,"abstraction":89,"structure":90},"CWE-88","Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')","The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component\nin another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the\nintended arguments, options, or switches within that command string.","When creating commands using interpolation into a string, developers may assume that only the arguments\u002Foptions that they specify will be processed.  This assumption may be even stronger when the programmer has encoded the command in a way that prevents separate commands from being provided maliciously, e.g. in the case of shell metacharacters.  When constructing the command, the developer may use whitespace or other delimiters that are required to separate arguments when the command. However, if an attacker can provide an untrusted input that contains argument-separating delimiters, then the resulting command will have more arguments than intended by the developer.  The attacker may then be able to change the behavior of the command.  Depending on the functionality supported by the extraneous arguments, this may have security-relevant consequences.","Draft","Base","Simple",1,[],{"title":94,"metaDescription":95,"keywords":96,"canonicalUrl":97,"structuredData":98},"What is CVE-2004-0480? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2004-0480, a critical severity cyber security vulnerability from 2004. Argument injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0....","CVE-2004-0480, CVE-2004-0480 vulnerability, CVE-2004-0480 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2004, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, ibm security, lotus_notes vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2004-0480",{"@context":99,"@type":100,"headline":94,"description":95,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":101,"publisher":105,"about":109,"mainEntityOfPage":113,"articleSection":116,"keywords":117},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":102,"name":103,"url":104},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":102,"name":103,"url":104,"logo":106},{"@type":107,"url":108},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":110,"name":6,"description":111,"additionalType":112},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":114,"@id":115},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2004-0480","Cybersecurity","CVE-2004-0480, CVE-2004-0480 vulnerability, CVE-2004-0480 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[119],{"Operator":28,"Negate":28,"Nodes":120},[121],{"Operator":122,"Negate":30,"CPEMatch":123},"OR",[124,126],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":40,"MatchCriteriaID":125,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"AB71B7AA-957B-46A6-9BC9-CE23EC721189",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":43,"MatchCriteriaID":127,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"1360A50E-C1E1-4690-874A-04CC7C1A77CC",[],[130],{"id":131,"eventType":132,"eventTime":133,"details":134,"label":135,"color":136},"65ac6959-f125-4391-b8ff-909658da51b2","LOW_EPSS_DELTA","2026-06-16T04:07:20.061454+00:00","Daily EPSS score decreased by 0.108 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Decreased","green",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":138,"version":22},1792282249226,{"score":140,"band":141,"action":142,"scoredAt":143},55,"Medium","Plan remediation","2026-10-17T06:32:37.393091+00:00"]