[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f9-h29oVCwTRON-_I4sIj19nwOH1z2D4RC3fIO3upmMs":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2005-3774":192},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":190},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":34,"epssPercentile":28,"epssTimeSeries":35,"severity":36,"affectedProducts":37,"affectedProductsCount":46,"references":47,"referencesCount":139,"weaknesses":140,"weaknessesCount":144,"isActivelyExploited":32,"cisaInfo":28,"otxData":28,"relatedBlogPosts":145,"seoMetadata":146,"configurations":171,"relatedVendorCves":181,"notableEvents":182},"CVE-2005-3774","What is CVE-2005-3774?","Cisco PIX 6.3 and 7.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (blocked new connections) via spoofed TCP packets that cause the PIX to create embryonic connections that that would not produce a valid connection with the end system, including (1) SYN packets with invalid checksums, which do not result in a RST; or, from an external interface, (2) one byte of \"meaningless data,\" or (3) a TTL that is one less than needed to reach the internal destination.","Cisco PIX 6.3 and 7.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (blocked new connections) via spoofed TCP packets that cause the PIX to create emb...","2005-11-23T00:03:00","2026-06-16T22:17:36.003",5,"AV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FAu:N\u002FC:N\u002FI:N\u002FA:P",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":17,"CVSSMetricV40":33},[],[],[18],{"Source":19,"Type":20,"CVSSData":21,"BaseSeverity":29,"ExploitabilityScore":30,"ImpactScore":31,"ACInsufInfo":32,"ObtainAllPrivilege":32,"ObtainUserPrivilege":32,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":32,"UserInteractionRequired":32},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":22,"VectorString":13,"AccessVector":23,"AccessComplexity":24,"Authentication":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":25,"IntegrityImpact":25,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":27,"Exploitability":28,"RemediationLevel":28,"ReportConfidence":28,"TemporalScore":28,"CollateralDamagePotential":28,"TargetDistribution":28,"ConfidentialityRequirement":28,"IntegrityRequirement":28,"AvailabilityRequirement":28,"EnvironmentalScore":28},"2.0","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","PARTIAL","",null,"MEDIUM",10,2.9,false,[],0.18207,[34,34,34,34,34,34,34],"Medium",[38,43],{"vendor":39,"product":40,"version":41,"criteria":42,"vulnerable":4},"cisco","pix","6.3","cpe:2.3:h:cisco:pix:6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":39,"product":40,"version":44,"criteria":45,"vulnerable":4},"7.0","cpe:2.3:h:cisco:pix:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",2,[48,53,56,60,64,68,71,76,80,84,87,90,93,96,100,104,107,109,111,113,115,117,119,121,123,125,127,129,131,133,135,137],{"url":49,"source":50,"tags":51},"http:\u002F\u002Flists.grok.org.uk\u002Fpipermail\u002Ffull-disclosure\u002F2005-November\u002F038971.html","Org",[52],"Vendor Advisory",{"url":54,"source":50,"tags":55},"http:\u002F\u002Flists.grok.org.uk\u002Fpipermail\u002Ffull-disclosure\u002F2005-November\u002F038983.html",[],{"url":57,"source":58,"tags":59},"http:\u002F\u002Fsecunia.com\u002Fadvisories\u002F17670","Secunia",[],{"url":61,"source":62,"tags":63},"http:\u002F\u002Fsecuritytracker.com\u002Fid?1015256","Securitytracker",[],{"url":65,"source":66,"tags":67},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.cisco.com\u002Fen\u002FUS\u002Fproducts\u002Fhw\u002Fvpndevc\u002Fps2030\u002Fproducts_security_notice09186a0080624a37.html","Cisco",[],{"url":69,"source":66,"tags":70},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.cisco.com\u002Fwarp\u002Fpublic\u002F707\u002Fcisco-response-20051122-pix.shtml",[],{"url":72,"source":73,"tags":74},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.kb.cert.org\u002Fvuls\u002Fid\u002F853540","Cert",[75],"US Government Resource",{"url":77,"source":78,"tags":79},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.osvdb.org\u002F24140","Osvdb",[],{"url":81,"source":82,"tags":83},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F417458\u002F30\u002F0\u002Fthreaded","Securityfocus",[],{"url":85,"source":82,"tags":86},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F426989\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":88,"source":82,"tags":89},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F426991\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":91,"source":82,"tags":92},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F427041\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":94,"source":82,"tags":95},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Fbid\u002F15525",[],{"url":97,"source":98,"tags":99},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.vupen.com\u002Fenglish\u002Fadvisories\u002F2005\u002F2546","Vupen",[],{"url":101,"source":102,"tags":103},"https:\u002F\u002Fexchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002F25077","Ibmcloud",[],{"url":105,"source":102,"tags":106},"https:\u002F\u002Fexchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002F25079",[],{"url":49,"source":50,"tags":108},[52],{"url":54,"source":50,"tags":110},[],{"url":57,"source":58,"tags":112},[],{"url":61,"source":62,"tags":114},[],{"url":65,"source":66,"tags":116},[],{"url":69,"source":66,"tags":118},[],{"url":72,"source":73,"tags":120},[75],{"url":77,"source":78,"tags":122},[],{"url":81,"source":82,"tags":124},[],{"url":85,"source":82,"tags":126},[],{"url":88,"source":82,"tags":128},[],{"url":91,"source":82,"tags":130},[],{"url":94,"source":82,"tags":132},[],{"url":97,"source":98,"tags":134},[],{"url":101,"source":102,"tags":136},[],{"url":105,"source":102,"tags":138},[],32,[141],{"id":142,"name":142,"description":143},"Unknown","NVD-CWE-Other",1,[],{"title":147,"metaDescription":148,"keywords":149,"canonicalUrl":150,"structuredData":151},"What is CVE-2005-3774? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2005-3774, a medium severity cyber security vulnerability from 2005. Cisco PIX 6.3 and 7.0 allows remote attackers to cause a d...","CVE-2005-3774, CVE-2005-3774 vulnerability, CVE-2005-3774 security, medium severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2005, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, cisco security, pix vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2005-3774",{"@context":152,"@type":153,"headline":147,"description":148,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":154,"publisher":158,"about":162,"mainEntityOfPage":166,"articleSection":169,"keywords":170},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":155,"name":156,"url":157},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":155,"name":156,"url":157,"logo":159},{"@type":160,"url":161},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":163,"name":6,"description":164,"additionalType":165},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":167,"@id":168},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2005-3774","Cybersecurity","CVE-2005-3774, CVE-2005-3774 vulnerability, CVE-2005-3774 security, medium severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[172],{"Operator":28,"Negate":28,"Nodes":173},[174],{"Operator":175,"Negate":32,"CPEMatch":176},"OR",[177,179],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":42,"MatchCriteriaID":178,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"B10C3812-2BA0-4DE3-8793-8F89AD342E30",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":45,"MatchCriteriaID":180,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"508DECFB-F334-409F-911B-BF8D842D3556",[],[183],{"id":184,"eventType":185,"eventTime":186,"details":187,"label":188,"color":189},"a01f1799-c15e-4c2c-9fea-16211f56a1ed","LOW_EPSS_DELTA","2026-06-16T04:07:16.205204+00:00","Daily EPSS score decreased by 0.169 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Decreased","green",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":191,"version":22},1792358780929,{"score":193,"band":194,"action":195,"scoredAt":196},25,"Low","Monitor","2026-10-17T06:33:29.885801+00:00"]