[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fv7VV9uB7FTJS7YLjRad_pXHjpfLyqbENU-Ufjcel8N0":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2008-0379":129},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":127},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":34,"epssPercentile":28,"epssTimeSeries":35,"severity":36,"affectedProducts":37,"affectedProductsCount":43,"references":44,"referencesCount":73,"weaknesses":74,"weaknessesCount":90,"isActivelyExploited":32,"cisaInfo":28,"otxData":28,"relatedBlogPosts":91,"seoMetadata":92,"configurations":117,"relatedVendorCves":125,"notableEvents":126},"CVE-2008-0379","What is CVE-2008-0379?","Race condition in the Enterprise Tree ActiveX control (EnterpriseControls.dll 11.5.0.313) in Crystal Reports XI Release 2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via the SelectedSession method, which triggers a buffer overflow.","Race condition in the Enterprise Tree ActiveX control (EnterpriseControls.dll 11.5.0.313) in Crystal Reports XI Release 2 allows remote attackers to cause a ...","2008-01-22T20:00:00","2026-06-16T22:49:29.977",9.3,"AV:N\u002FAC:M\u002FAu:N\u002FC:C\u002FI:C\u002FA:C",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":17,"CVSSMetricV40":33},[],[],[18],{"Source":19,"Type":20,"CVSSData":21,"BaseSeverity":29,"ExploitabilityScore":30,"ImpactScore":31,"ACInsufInfo":32,"ObtainAllPrivilege":4,"ObtainUserPrivilege":32,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":32,"UserInteractionRequired":4},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":22,"VectorString":13,"AccessVector":23,"AccessComplexity":24,"Authentication":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":26,"IntegrityImpact":26,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":27,"Exploitability":28,"RemediationLevel":28,"ReportConfidence":28,"TemporalScore":28,"CollateralDamagePotential":28,"TargetDistribution":28,"ConfidentialityRequirement":28,"IntegrityRequirement":28,"AvailabilityRequirement":28,"EnvironmentalScore":28},"2.0","NETWORK","MEDIUM","NONE","COMPLETE","",null,"HIGH",8.6,10,false,[],0.08559,[34,34,34,34,34,34,34],"Critical",[38],{"vendor":39,"product":40,"version":41,"criteria":42,"vulnerable":4},"businessobjects","crystal_reports_xi","r2","cpe:2.3:a:businessobjects:crystal_reports_xi:r2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",1,[45,53,57,61,65,67,69,71],{"url":46,"source":47,"tags":48},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Fbid\u002F27333","Securityfocus",[49,50,51,52],"Broken Link","Exploit","Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry",{"url":54,"source":55,"tags":56},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securitytracker.com\u002Fid?1019239","Securitytracker",[49,51,52],{"url":58,"source":59,"tags":60},"https:\u002F\u002Fexchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002F39743","Ibmcloud",[51,52],{"url":62,"source":63,"tags":64},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.exploit-db.com\u002Fexploits\u002F4931","Exploit-db",[50,51,52],{"url":46,"source":47,"tags":66},[49,50,51,52],{"url":54,"source":55,"tags":68},[49,51,52],{"url":58,"source":59,"tags":70},[51,52],{"url":62,"source":63,"tags":72},[50,51,52],8,[75,83],{"id":76,"name":77,"description":78,"extendedDescription":79,"status":80,"abstraction":81,"structure":82},"CWE-120","Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')","The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow.","A buffer overflow condition exists when a product attempts to put more data in a buffer than it can hold, or when it attempts to put data in a memory area outside of the boundaries of a buffer. The simplest type of error, and the most common cause of buffer overflows, is the \"classic\" case in which the product copies the buffer without restricting how much is copied. Other variants exist, but the existence of a classic overflow strongly suggests that the programmer is not considering even the most basic of security protections.","Incomplete","Base","Simple",{"id":84,"name":85,"description":86,"extendedDescription":87,"status":88,"abstraction":89,"structure":82},"CWE-362","Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')","The product contains a code sequence that can run concurrently with other code, and the code sequence requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence that is operating concurrently.","This can have security implications when the expected synchronization is in security-critical code, such as recording whether a user is authenticated or modifying important state information that should not be influenced by an outsider.\nA race condition occurs within concurrent environments, and is effectively a property of a code sequence. Depending on the context, a code sequence may be in the form of a function call, a small number of instructions, a series of program invocations, etc.\nA race condition violates these properties, which are closely related:\nA race condition exists when an \"interfering code sequence\" can still access the shared resource, violating exclusivity. Programmers may assume that certain code sequences execute too quickly to be affected by an interfering code sequence; when they are not, this violates atomicity. For example, the single \"x++\" statement may appear atomic at the code layer, but it is actually non-atomic at the instruction layer, since it involves a read (the original value of x), followed by a computation (x+1), followed by a write (save the result to x).\nThe interfering code sequence could be \"trusted\" or \"untrusted.\" A trusted interfering code sequence occurs within the product; it cannot be modified by the attacker, and it can only be invoked indirectly. An untrusted interfering code sequence can be authored directly by the attacker, and typically it is external to the vulnerable product.","Draft","Class",2,[],{"title":93,"metaDescription":94,"keywords":95,"canonicalUrl":96,"structuredData":97},"What is CVE-2008-0379? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2008-0379, a critical severity cyber security vulnerability from 2008. Race condition in the Enterprise Tree ActiveX control (E...","CVE-2008-0379, CVE-2008-0379 vulnerability, CVE-2008-0379 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2008, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, businessobjects security, crystal_reports_xi vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2008-0379",{"@context":98,"@type":99,"headline":93,"description":94,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":100,"publisher":104,"about":108,"mainEntityOfPage":112,"articleSection":115,"keywords":116},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":101,"name":102,"url":103},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":101,"name":102,"url":103,"logo":105},{"@type":106,"url":107},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":109,"name":6,"description":110,"additionalType":111},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":113,"@id":114},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2008-0379","Cybersecurity","CVE-2008-0379, CVE-2008-0379 vulnerability, CVE-2008-0379 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[118],{"Operator":28,"Negate":28,"Nodes":119},[120],{"Operator":121,"Negate":32,"CPEMatch":122},"OR",[123],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":42,"MatchCriteriaID":124,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"11DC74BF-CF03-49F5-89AA-609AA8758A39",[],[],{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":128,"version":22},1792367749038,{"score":130,"band":131,"action":132,"scoredAt":133},51,"Medium","Plan remediation","2026-10-17T06:35:41.017269+00:00"]