[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fGZexgngAcL5oxwJyj7f2GACvBMrI2zwiBHVRrTW4jLU":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2008-1201":156},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":154},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":33,"epssPercentile":28,"epssTimeSeries":34,"severity":35,"affectedProducts":36,"affectedProductsCount":45,"references":46,"referencesCount":95,"weaknesses":96,"weaknessesCount":105,"isActivelyExploited":31,"cisaInfo":28,"otxData":28,"relatedBlogPosts":106,"seoMetadata":107,"configurations":132,"relatedVendorCves":145,"notableEvents":146},"CVE-2008-1201","What is CVE-2008-1201?","Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in FLA file parsing in Adobe Flash CS3 Professional, Flash Professional 8, and Flash Basic 8 on Windows allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .FLA file.","Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in FLA file parsing in Adobe Flash CS3 Professional, Flash Professional 8, and Flash Basic 8 on Windows allow user-assis...","2008-03-24T17:44:00","2026-06-16T22:51:13.23",6.8,"AV:N\u002FAC:M\u002FAu:N\u002FC:P\u002FI:P\u002FA:P",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":17,"CVSSMetricV40":32},[],[],[18],{"Source":19,"Type":20,"CVSSData":21,"BaseSeverity":24,"ExploitabilityScore":29,"ImpactScore":30,"ACInsufInfo":31,"ObtainAllPrivilege":31,"ObtainUserPrivilege":31,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":4,"UserInteractionRequired":4},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":22,"VectorString":13,"AccessVector":23,"AccessComplexity":24,"Authentication":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":26,"IntegrityImpact":26,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":27,"Exploitability":28,"RemediationLevel":28,"ReportConfidence":28,"TemporalScore":28,"CollateralDamagePotential":28,"TargetDistribution":28,"ConfidentialityRequirement":28,"IntegrityRequirement":28,"AvailabilityRequirement":28,"EnvironmentalScore":28},"2.0","NETWORK","MEDIUM","NONE","PARTIAL","",null,8.6,6.4,false,[],0.19684,[33,33,33,33,33,33,33],"Medium",[37,42],{"vendor":38,"product":39,"version":40,"criteria":41,"vulnerable":4},"adobe","flash","basic","cpe:2.3:a:adobe:flash:basic:8:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":38,"product":39,"version":43,"criteria":44,"vulnerable":4},"professional","cpe:2.3:a:adobe:flash:professional:8:*:*:*:*:*:*",2,[47,51,55,59,63,67,71,75,79,81,83,85,87,89,91,93],{"url":48,"source":49,"tags":50},"http:\u002F\u002Fruder.cdut.net\u002Fblogview.asp?logID=241","Cdut",[],{"url":52,"source":53,"tags":54},"http:\u002F\u002Fsecunia.com\u002Fadvisories\u002F29455","Secunia",[],{"url":56,"source":57,"tags":58},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.adobe.com\u002Fsupport\u002Fsecurity\u002Fadvisories\u002Fapsa08-03.html","Adobe",[],{"url":60,"source":61,"tags":62},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.fortiguardcenter.com\u002Fadvisory\u002FFGA-2008-07.html","Fortiguardcenter",[],{"url":64,"source":65,"tags":66},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Fbid\u002F28349","Securityfocus",[],{"url":68,"source":69,"tags":70},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securitytracker.com\u002Fid?1019681","Securitytracker",[],{"url":72,"source":73,"tags":74},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.vupen.com\u002Fenglish\u002Fadvisories\u002F2008\u002F0948\u002Freferences","Vupen",[],{"url":76,"source":77,"tags":78},"https:\u002F\u002Fexchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002F41327","Ibmcloud",[],{"url":48,"source":49,"tags":80},[],{"url":52,"source":53,"tags":82},[],{"url":56,"source":57,"tags":84},[],{"url":60,"source":61,"tags":86},[],{"url":64,"source":65,"tags":88},[],{"url":68,"source":69,"tags":90},[],{"url":72,"source":73,"tags":92},[],{"url":76,"source":77,"tags":94},[],16,[97],{"id":98,"name":99,"description":100,"extendedDescription":101,"status":102,"abstraction":103,"structure":104},"CWE-94","Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')","The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.","When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. Such an alteration could lead to arbitrary code execution.\nInjection problems encompass a wide variety of issues -- all mitigated in very different ways. For this reason, the most effective way to discuss these weaknesses is to note the distinct features which classify them as injection weaknesses. The most important issue to note is that all injection problems share one thing in common -- i.e., they allow for the injection of control plane data into the user-controlled data plane. This means that the execution of the process may be altered by sending code in through legitimate data channels, using no other mechanism. While buffer overflows, and many other flaws, involve the use of some further issue to gain execution, injection problems need only for the data to be parsed. The most classic instantiations of this category of weakness are SQL injection and format string vulnerabilities.","Draft","Base","Simple",1,[],{"title":108,"metaDescription":109,"keywords":110,"canonicalUrl":111,"structuredData":112},"What is CVE-2008-1201? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2008-1201, a medium severity cyber security vulnerability from 2008. Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in FLA file parsing i...","CVE-2008-1201, CVE-2008-1201 vulnerability, CVE-2008-1201 security, medium severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2008, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, adobe security, flash vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2008-1201",{"@context":113,"@type":114,"headline":108,"description":109,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":115,"publisher":119,"about":123,"mainEntityOfPage":127,"articleSection":130,"keywords":131},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":116,"name":117,"url":118},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":116,"name":117,"url":118,"logo":120},{"@type":121,"url":122},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":124,"name":6,"description":125,"additionalType":126},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":128,"@id":129},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2008-1201","Cybersecurity","CVE-2008-1201, CVE-2008-1201 vulnerability, CVE-2008-1201 security, medium severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[133],{"Operator":28,"Negate":28,"Nodes":134},[135],{"Operator":136,"Negate":31,"CPEMatch":137},"OR",[138,140,142],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":41,"MatchCriteriaID":139,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"AE84A707-495C-4690-9E37-60D8DED51342",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":44,"MatchCriteriaID":141,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"81CE77EB-2050-4EC5-957F-90F4F96230A4",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":143,"MatchCriteriaID":144,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"cpe:2.3:a:adobe:flash:professional:cs3:*:*:*:*:*:*","5845F66C-214D-48AE-BE8B-28A19F2D757C",[],[147],{"id":148,"eventType":149,"eventTime":150,"details":151,"label":152,"color":153},"01eda45d-3ad3-4626-8226-3a9f9bf93da4","HIGH_EPSS_DELTA","2026-06-16T04:07:06.012631+00:00","Daily EPSS score increased by 0.105 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Increased","red",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":155,"version":22},1792372364903,{"score":157,"band":158,"action":159,"scoredAt":160},31,"Low","Monitor","2026-10-17T06:35:48.446724+00:00"]