[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fI-rjMRjxK2MTrPmxl1MH-lKEbBAFs9c7LxE8eQRZO_w":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2011-1653":216},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":214},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":32,"epssPercentile":28,"epssTimeSeries":33,"severity":34,"affectedProducts":35,"affectedProductsCount":41,"references":42,"referencesCount":162,"weaknesses":163,"weaknessesCount":41,"isActivelyExploited":30,"cisaInfo":28,"otxData":28,"relatedBlogPosts":171,"seoMetadata":172,"configurations":197,"relatedVendorCves":205,"notableEvents":206},"CVE-2011-1653","What is CVE-2011-1653?","Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Unified Network Control (UNC) Server in CA Total Defense (TD) r12 before SE2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via vectors involving the (1) UnAssignFunctionalRoles, (2) UnassignAdminRoles, (3) DeleteFilter, (4) NonAssignedUserList, (5) DeleteReportLayout, (6) DeleteReports, and (7) RegenerateReport stored procedures.","Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Unified Network Control (UNC) Server in CA Total Defense (TD) r12 before SE2 allow remote attackers to execute ...","2011-04-18T15:00:43.327","2026-06-16T23:29:45.223",10,"AV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FAu:N\u002FC:C\u002FI:C\u002FA:C",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":17,"CVSSMetricV40":31},[],[],[18],{"Source":19,"Type":20,"CVSSData":21,"BaseSeverity":29,"ExploitabilityScore":12,"ImpactScore":12,"ACInsufInfo":30,"ObtainAllPrivilege":30,"ObtainUserPrivilege":30,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":30,"UserInteractionRequired":30},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":22,"VectorString":13,"AccessVector":23,"AccessComplexity":24,"Authentication":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":26,"IntegrityImpact":26,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":27,"Exploitability":28,"RemediationLevel":28,"ReportConfidence":28,"TemporalScore":28,"CollateralDamagePotential":28,"TargetDistribution":28,"ConfidentialityRequirement":28,"IntegrityRequirement":28,"AvailabilityRequirement":28,"EnvironmentalScore":28},"2.0","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","COMPLETE","",null,"HIGH",false,[],0.88655,[32,32,32,32,32,32,32],"Critical",[36],{"vendor":37,"product":38,"version":39,"criteria":40,"vulnerable":4},"broadcom","total_defense","r12","cpe:2.3:a:broadcom:total_defense:r12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",1,[43,48,52,56,60,63,66,69,72,75,78,81,84,88,92,95,98,101,104,107,110,114,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,140,142,144,146,148,150,152,154,156,158,160],{"url":44,"source":45,"tags":46},"http:\u002F\u002Fsecunia.com\u002Fadvisories\u002F44097","Secunia",[47],"Vendor Advisory",{"url":49,"source":50,"tags":51},"http:\u002F\u002Fsecurityreason.com\u002Fsecurityalert\u002F8403","Securityreason",[],{"url":53,"source":54,"tags":55},"http:\u002F\u002Fsecuritytracker.com\u002Fid?1025353","Securitytracker",[],{"url":57,"source":58,"tags":59},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F517489\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded","Securityfocus",[],{"url":61,"source":58,"tags":62},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F517490\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":64,"source":58,"tags":65},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F517491\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":67,"source":58,"tags":68},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F517493\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":70,"source":58,"tags":71},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F517494\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":73,"source":58,"tags":74},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F517496\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":76,"source":58,"tags":77},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F517497\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":79,"source":58,"tags":80},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Farchive\u002F1\u002F517498\u002F100\u002F0\u002Fthreaded",[],{"url":82,"source":58,"tags":83},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Fbid\u002F47355",[],{"url":85,"source":86,"tags":87},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.vupen.com\u002Fenglish\u002Fadvisories\u002F2011\u002F0977","Vupen",[47],{"url":89,"source":90,"tags":91},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zerodayinitiative.com\u002Fadvisories\u002FZDI-11-128\u002F","Zerodayinitiative",[],{"url":93,"source":90,"tags":94},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zerodayinitiative.com\u002Fadvisories\u002FZDI-11-129\u002F",[],{"url":96,"source":90,"tags":97},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zerodayinitiative.com\u002Fadvisories\u002FZDI-11-130\u002F",[],{"url":99,"source":90,"tags":100},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zerodayinitiative.com\u002Fadvisories\u002FZDI-11-131\u002F",[],{"url":102,"source":90,"tags":103},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zerodayinitiative.com\u002Fadvisories\u002FZDI-11-132\u002F",[],{"url":105,"source":90,"tags":106},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zerodayinitiative.com\u002Fadvisories\u002FZDI-11-133\u002F",[],{"url":108,"source":90,"tags":109},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.zerodayinitiative.com\u002Fadvisories\u002FZDI-11-134\u002F",[],{"url":111,"source":112,"tags":113},"https:\u002F\u002Fexchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002F66725","Ibmcloud",[],{"url":115,"source":116,"tags":117},"https:\u002F\u002Fsupport.ca.com\u002Firj\u002Fportal\u002Fanonymous\u002Fphpsupcontent?contentID=%7BCD065CEC-AFE2-4D9D-8E0B-BE7F6E345866%7D","Ca",[],{"url":44,"source":45,"tags":119},[47],{"url":49,"source":50,"tags":121},[],{"url":53,"source":54,"tags":123},[],{"url":57,"source":58,"tags":125},[],{"url":61,"source":58,"tags":127},[],{"url":64,"source":58,"tags":129},[],{"url":67,"source":58,"tags":131},[],{"url":70,"source":58,"tags":133},[],{"url":73,"source":58,"tags":135},[],{"url":76,"source":58,"tags":137},[],{"url":79,"source":58,"tags":139},[],{"url":82,"source":58,"tags":141},[],{"url":85,"source":86,"tags":143},[47],{"url":89,"source":90,"tags":145},[],{"url":93,"source":90,"tags":147},[],{"url":96,"source":90,"tags":149},[],{"url":99,"source":90,"tags":151},[],{"url":102,"source":90,"tags":153},[],{"url":105,"source":90,"tags":155},[],{"url":108,"source":90,"tags":157},[],{"url":111,"source":112,"tags":159},[],{"url":115,"source":116,"tags":161},[],44,[164],{"id":165,"name":166,"description":167,"extendedDescription":27,"status":168,"abstraction":169,"structure":170},"CWE-89","Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')","The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.","Stable","Base","Simple",[],{"title":173,"metaDescription":174,"keywords":175,"canonicalUrl":176,"structuredData":177},"What is CVE-2011-1653? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2011-1653, a critical severity cyber security vulnerability from 2011. High exploit probability (88.7%). Multiple SQL injection...","CVE-2011-1653, CVE-2011-1653 vulnerability, CVE-2011-1653 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2011, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, broadcom security, total_defense vulnerability, high risk vulnerability, actively exploited, exploit available","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2011-1653",{"@context":178,"@type":179,"headline":173,"description":174,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":180,"publisher":184,"about":188,"mainEntityOfPage":192,"articleSection":195,"keywords":196},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":181,"name":182,"url":183},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":181,"name":182,"url":183,"logo":185},{"@type":186,"url":187},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":189,"name":6,"description":190,"additionalType":191},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":193,"@id":194},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2011-1653","Cybersecurity","CVE-2011-1653, CVE-2011-1653 vulnerability, CVE-2011-1653 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[198],{"Operator":28,"Negate":28,"Nodes":199},[200],{"Operator":201,"Negate":30,"CPEMatch":202},"OR",[203],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":40,"MatchCriteriaID":204,"VersionStartExcluding":28,"VersionStartIncluding":28,"VersionEndExcluding":28,"VersionEndIncluding":28},"EAD87D20-B6C6-4D48-BEF7-5960AB2060D0",[],[207],{"id":208,"eventType":209,"eventTime":210,"details":211,"label":212,"color":213},"66c6643a-1696-4295-996f-a3aa677f96fe","HIGH_EPSS_DELTA","2026-06-16T04:06:54.868126+00:00","Daily EPSS score increased by 0.114 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Increased","red",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":215,"version":22},1792359833875,{"score":217,"band":218,"action":219,"scoredAt":220},70,"High","Patch now","2026-10-17T06:38:08.949083+00:00"]