[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fqOWq_FAAzbQ_ukEZd4qwN4XSZxnL4n5SBmxQs5Zh8V8":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2017-14094":135},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":133},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":39,"epssPercentile":15,"epssTimeSeries":40,"severity":41,"affectedProducts":42,"affectedProductsCount":48,"references":49,"referencesCount":70,"weaknesses":71,"weaknessesCount":87,"isActivelyExploited":88,"cisaInfo":15,"otxData":15,"relatedBlogPosts":89,"seoMetadata":90,"configurations":115,"relatedVendorCves":124,"notableEvents":125},"CVE-2017-14094","What is CVE-2017-14094?","A vulnerability in Trend Micro Smart Protection Server (Standalone) versions 3.2 and below could allow an attacker to perform remote command execution via a cron job injection on a vulnerable system.","A vulnerability in Trend Micro Smart Protection Server (Standalone) versions 3.2 and below could allow an attacker to perform remote command execution via a ...","2018-01-19T19:29:00.467","2019-10-09T23:23:47.593",9.8,"CVSS:3.0\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:N\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:H\u002FA:H",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":30,"CVSSMetricV40":15},null,[17],{"Source":18,"Type":19,"CVSSData":20,"ExploitabilityScore":28,"ImpactScore":29},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":21,"VectorString":13,"AttackVector":22,"AttackComplexity":23,"PrivilegesRequired":24,"UserInteraction":24,"Scope":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":26,"IntegrityImpact":26,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":27,"ExploitCodeMaturity":15,"RemediationLevel":15,"ReportConfidence":15,"TemporalScore":15,"TemporalSeverity":15,"ConfidentialityRequirement":15,"IntegrityRequirement":15,"AvailabilityRequirement":15,"ModifiedAttackVector":15,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":15,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":15,"ModifiedUserInteraction":15,"ModifiedScope":15,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":15,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":15,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":15,"EnvironmentalScore":15,"EnvironmentalSeverity":15},"3.0","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","UNCHANGED","HIGH","CRITICAL",3.9,5.9,[31],{"Source":18,"Type":19,"CVSSData":32,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitabilityScore":37,"ImpactScore":38,"ACInsufInfo":15,"ObtainAllPrivilege":15,"ObtainUserPrivilege":15,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":15,"UserInteractionRequired":15},{"Version":33,"VectorString":34,"AccessVector":22,"AccessComplexity":23,"Authentication":24,"ConfidentialityImpact":35,"IntegrityImpact":35,"AvailabilityImpact":35,"BaseScore":36,"BaseSeverity":15,"Exploitability":15,"RemediationLevel":15,"ReportConfidence":15,"TemporalScore":15,"CollateralDamagePotential":15,"TargetDistribution":15,"ConfidentialityRequirement":15,"IntegrityRequirement":15,"AvailabilityRequirement":15,"EnvironmentalScore":15},"2.0","AV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FAu:N\u002FC:P\u002FI:P\u002FA:P","PARTIAL",7.5,10,6.4,0.19369,[39,39,39,39,39,39,39],"Critical",[43],{"vendor":44,"product":45,"version":46,"criteria":47,"vulnerable":4},"trendmicro","smart_protection_server","*","cpe:2.3:a:trendmicro:smart_protection_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",1,[50,56,61,66],{"url":51,"source":52,"tags":53},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Fbid\u002F102275","Securityfocus",[54,55],"Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry",{"url":57,"source":58,"tags":59},"https:\u002F\u002Fsuccess.trendmicro.com\u002Fsolution\u002F1118992","Trendmicro",[60],"Vendor Advisory",{"url":62,"source":63,"tags":64},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.coresecurity.com\u002Fadvisories\u002Ftrend-micro-smart-protection-server-multiple-vulnerabilities","Coresecurity",[65,54],"Exploit",{"url":67,"source":68,"tags":69},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.exploit-db.com\u002Fexploits\u002F43388\u002F","Exploit-db",[54,55],4,[72,80],{"id":73,"name":74,"description":75,"extendedDescription":76,"status":77,"abstraction":78,"structure":79},"CWE-78","Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')","The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.","This weakness can lead to a vulnerability in environments in which the attacker does not have direct access to the operating system, such as in web applications. Alternately, if the weakness occurs in a privileged program, it could allow the attacker to specify commands that normally would not be accessible, or to call alternate commands with privileges that the attacker does not have. The problem is exacerbated if the compromised process does not follow the principle of least privilege, because the attacker-controlled commands may run with special system privileges that increases the amount of damage.\nThere are at least two subtypes of OS command injection:\nFrom a weakness standpoint, these variants represent distinct programmer errors. In the first variant, the programmer clearly intends that input from untrusted parties will be part of the arguments in the command to be executed. In the second variant, the programmer does not intend for the command to be accessible to any untrusted party, but the programmer probably has not accounted for alternate ways in which malicious attackers can provide input.","Stable","Base","Simple",{"id":81,"name":82,"description":83,"extendedDescription":84,"status":85,"abstraction":86,"structure":79},"CWE-74","Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')","The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.","Software or other automated logic has certain assumptions about what constitutes data and control respectively. It is the lack of verification of these assumptions for user-controlled input that leads to injection problems. Injection problems encompass a wide variety of issues -- all mitigated in very different ways and usually attempted in order to alter the control flow of the process. For this reason, the most effective way to discuss these weaknesses is to note the distinct features that classify them as injection weaknesses. The most important issue to note is that all injection problems share one thing in common -- i.e., they allow for the injection of control plane data into the user-controlled data plane. This means that the execution of the process may be altered by sending code in through legitimate data channels, using no other mechanism. While buffer overflows, and many other flaws, involve the use of some further issue to gain execution, injection problems need only for the data to be parsed.","Incomplete","Class",2,false,[],{"title":91,"metaDescription":92,"keywords":93,"canonicalUrl":94,"structuredData":95},"What is CVE-2017-14094? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2017-14094, a critical severity cyber security vulnerability from 2018. A vulnerability in Trend Micro Smart Protection Server ...","CVE-2017-14094, CVE-2017-14094 vulnerability, CVE-2017-14094 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2018, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, trendmicro security, smart_protection_server vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2017-14094",{"@context":96,"@type":97,"headline":91,"description":92,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":98,"publisher":102,"about":106,"mainEntityOfPage":110,"articleSection":113,"keywords":114},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":99,"name":100,"url":101},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":99,"name":100,"url":101,"logo":103},{"@type":104,"url":105},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":107,"name":6,"description":108,"additionalType":109},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":111,"@id":112},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2017-14094","Cybersecurity","CVE-2017-14094, CVE-2017-14094 vulnerability, CVE-2017-14094 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[116],{"Operator":15,"Negate":15,"Nodes":117},[118],{"Operator":119,"Negate":15,"CPEMatch":120},"OR",[121],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":47,"MatchCriteriaID":122,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":123},"20F6330B-124B-4702-BC1E-7A27F24CF5E9","3.2",[],[126],{"id":127,"eventType":128,"eventTime":129,"details":130,"label":131,"color":132},"e6945c94-0747-4f48-9b5a-81a2f375e7de","LOW_EPSS_DELTA","2026-06-16T04:06:25.948419+00:00","Daily EPSS score decreased by 0.366 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Decreased","green",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":134,"version":33},1792378580129,{"score":136,"band":137,"action":138,"scoredAt":139},62,"Medium","Plan remediation","2026-10-16T06:43:16.511639+00:00"]