[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fpj1ZTSQhKPIp13e0UmSYnfVpE7DGgng53Uf5L5EnEzo":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2017-3191":178},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":176},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":40,"epssPercentile":15,"epssTimeSeries":41,"severity":42,"affectedProducts":43,"affectedProductsCount":61,"references":62,"referencesCount":92,"weaknesses":93,"weaknessesCount":109,"isActivelyExploited":110,"cisaInfo":15,"otxData":15,"relatedBlogPosts":111,"seoMetadata":112,"configurations":137,"relatedVendorCves":160,"notableEvents":161},"CVE-2017-3191","What is CVE-2017-3191?","D-Link DIR-130 firmware version 1.23 and DIR-330 firmware version 1.12 are vulnerable to authentication bypass of the remote login page. A remote attacker that can access the remote management login page can manipulate the POST request in such a manner as to access some administrator-only pages such as tools_admin.asp without credentials.","D-Link DIR-130 firmware version 1.23 and DIR-330 firmware version 1.12 are vulnerable to authentication bypass of the remote login page. A remote attacker th...","2017-12-16T02:29:10.277","2025-04-20T01:37:25.86",9.8,"CVSS:3.0\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:N\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:H\u002FA:H",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":30,"CVSSMetricV40":15},null,[17],{"Source":18,"Type":19,"CVSSData":20,"ExploitabilityScore":28,"ImpactScore":29},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":21,"VectorString":13,"AttackVector":22,"AttackComplexity":23,"PrivilegesRequired":24,"UserInteraction":24,"Scope":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":26,"IntegrityImpact":26,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":27,"ExploitCodeMaturity":15,"RemediationLevel":15,"ReportConfidence":15,"TemporalScore":15,"TemporalSeverity":15,"ConfidentialityRequirement":15,"IntegrityRequirement":15,"AvailabilityRequirement":15,"ModifiedAttackVector":15,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":15,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":15,"ModifiedUserInteraction":15,"ModifiedScope":15,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":15,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":15,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":15,"EnvironmentalScore":15,"EnvironmentalSeverity":15},"3.0","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","UNCHANGED","HIGH","CRITICAL",3.9,5.9,[31],{"Source":18,"Type":19,"CVSSData":32,"BaseSeverity":37,"ExploitabilityScore":38,"ImpactScore":39,"ACInsufInfo":15,"ObtainAllPrivilege":15,"ObtainUserPrivilege":15,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":15,"UserInteractionRequired":15},{"Version":33,"VectorString":34,"AccessVector":22,"AccessComplexity":23,"Authentication":24,"ConfidentialityImpact":35,"IntegrityImpact":24,"AvailabilityImpact":24,"BaseScore":36,"BaseSeverity":15,"Exploitability":15,"RemediationLevel":15,"ReportConfidence":15,"TemporalScore":15,"CollateralDamagePotential":15,"TargetDistribution":15,"ConfidentialityRequirement":15,"IntegrityRequirement":15,"AvailabilityRequirement":15,"EnvironmentalScore":15},"2.0","AV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FAu:N\u002FC:P\u002FI:N\u002FA:N","PARTIAL",5,"MEDIUM",10,2.9,0.62527,[40,40,40,40,40,40,40],"Critical",[44,49,54,58],{"vendor":45,"product":46,"version":47,"criteria":48,"vulnerable":4},"d-link","dir-130_firmware","1.23","cpe:2.3:o:d-link:dir-130_firmware:1.23:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":50,"product":51,"version":52,"criteria":53,"vulnerable":4},"dlink","dir-130","-","cpe:2.3:h:dlink:dir-130:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":45,"product":55,"version":56,"criteria":57,"vulnerable":4},"dir-330_firmware","1.12","cpe:2.3:o:d-link:dir-330_firmware:1.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":50,"product":59,"version":52,"criteria":60,"vulnerable":4},"dir-330","cpe:2.3:h:dlink:dir-330:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",4,[63,68,75,80,84,86,88,90],{"url":64,"source":65,"tags":66},"https:\u002F\u002Fexchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002F123293","Ibmcloud",[67],"VDB Entry",{"url":69,"source":70,"tags":71},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kb.cert.org\u002Fvuls\u002Fid\u002F553503","Cert",[72,73,74],"Issue Tracking","Third Party Advisory","US Government Resource",{"url":76,"source":77,"tags":78},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.scmagazine.com\u002Fd-link-dir-130-and-dir-330-routers-vulnerable\u002Farticle\u002F644553\u002F","Scmagazine",[79],"Press\u002FMedia Coverage",{"url":81,"source":82,"tags":83},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wilderssecurity.com\u002Fthreads\u002Fd-link-dir-130-and-dir-330-are-vulnerable-to-authentication-bypass-and-do-not-protect-credentials.392703\u002F","Wilderssecurity",[72,73],{"url":64,"source":65,"tags":85},[67],{"url":69,"source":70,"tags":87},[72,73,74],{"url":76,"source":77,"tags":89},[79],{"url":81,"source":82,"tags":91},[72,73],8,[94,102],{"id":95,"name":96,"description":97,"extendedDescription":98,"status":99,"abstraction":100,"structure":101},"CWE-20","Improper Input Validation","The product receives input or data, but it does\n        not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the\n        properties that are required to process the data safely and\n        correctly.","Input validation is a frequently-used technique\n\t   for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to\n\t   ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the\n\t   code, or when communicating with other components.  When\n\t   software does not validate input properly, an attacker is\n\t   able to craft the input in a form that is not expected by\n\t   the rest of the application. This will lead to parts of the\n\t   system receiving unintended input, which may result in\n\t   altered control flow, arbitrary control of a resource, or\n\t   arbitrary code execution.\nInput validation is not the only technique for\n\t   processing input, however.  Other techniques attempt to\n\t   transform potentially-dangerous input into something safe, such\n\t   as filtering (CWE-790) - which attempts to remove dangerous\n\t   inputs - or encoding\u002Fescaping (CWE-116), which attempts to\n\t   ensure that the input is not misinterpreted when it is included\n\t   in output to another component. Other techniques exist as well\n\t   (see CWE-138 for more examples.)\nInput validation can be applied to:\nData can be simple or structured.  Structured data\n\t   can be composed of many nested layers, composed of\n\t   combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or\n\t   structured data.\nMany properties of raw data or metadata may need\n\t   to be validated upon entry into the code, such\n\t   as:\nImplied or derived properties of data must often\n\t   be calculated or inferred by the code itself.  Errors in\n\t   deriving properties may be considered a contributing factor\n\t   to improper input validation.\nNote that \"input validation\" has very different\n\t   meanings to different people, or within different\n\t   classification schemes.  Caution must be used when\n\t   referencing this CWE entry or mapping to it.  For example,\n\t   some weaknesses might involve inadvertently giving control\n\t   to an attacker over an input when they should not be able\n\t   to provide an input at all, but sometimes this is referred\n\t   to as input validation.\nFinally, it is important to emphasize that the\n\t   distinctions between input validation and output escaping\n\t   are often blurred, and developers must be careful to\n\t   understand the difference, including how input validation\n\t   is not always sufficient to prevent vulnerabilities,\n\t   especially when less stringent data types must be\n\t   supported, such as free-form text. Consider a SQL injection\n\t   scenario in which a person's last name is inserted into a\n\t   query. The name \"O'Reilly\" would likely pass the validation\n\t   step since it is a common last name in the English\n\t   language. However, this valid name cannot be directly\n\t   inserted into the database because it contains the \"'\"\n\t   apostrophe character, which would need to be escaped or\n\t   otherwise transformed. In this case, removing the\n\t   apostrophe might reduce the risk of SQL injection, but it\n\t   would produce incorrect behavior because the wrong name\n\t   would be recorded.","Stable","Class","Simple",{"id":103,"name":104,"description":105,"extendedDescription":106,"status":107,"abstraction":108,"structure":101},"CWE-294","Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay","A capture-replay flaw exists when the design of the product makes it possible for a malicious user to sniff network traffic and bypass authentication by replaying it to the server in question to the same effect as the original message (or with minor changes).","Capture-replay attacks are common and can be difficult to defeat without cryptography. They are a subset of network injection attacks that rely on observing previously-sent valid commands, then changing them slightly if necessary and resending the same commands to the server.","Incomplete","Base",2,false,[],{"title":113,"metaDescription":114,"keywords":115,"canonicalUrl":116,"structuredData":117},"What is CVE-2017-3191? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2017-3191, a critical severity cyber security vulnerability from 2017. High exploit probability (62.5%). D-Link DIR-130 firmwar...","CVE-2017-3191, CVE-2017-3191 vulnerability, CVE-2017-3191 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2017, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, d-link security, dlink security, dir-130_firmware vulnerability, dir-130 vulnerability, dir-330_firmware vulnerability, dir-330 vulnerability, high risk vulnerability, actively exploited","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2017-3191",{"@context":118,"@type":119,"headline":113,"description":114,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":120,"publisher":124,"about":128,"mainEntityOfPage":132,"articleSection":135,"keywords":136},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":121,"name":122,"url":123},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":121,"name":122,"url":123,"logo":125},{"@type":126,"url":127},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":129,"name":6,"description":130,"additionalType":131},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":133,"@id":134},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2017-3191","Cybersecurity","CVE-2017-3191, CVE-2017-3191 vulnerability, CVE-2017-3191 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[138,150],{"Operator":139,"Negate":15,"Nodes":140},"AND",[141,146],{"Operator":142,"Negate":15,"CPEMatch":143},"OR",[144],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":48,"MatchCriteriaID":145,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"5800812B-C749-4D9C-8E2C-BF8EFE56FFF6",{"Operator":142,"Negate":15,"CPEMatch":147},[148],{"Vulnerable":15,"Criteria":53,"MatchCriteriaID":149,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"EDAD83C8-CA60-4E7A-985A-89967A321D6E",{"Operator":139,"Negate":15,"Nodes":151},[152,156],{"Operator":142,"Negate":15,"CPEMatch":153},[154],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":57,"MatchCriteriaID":155,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"635BCAA5-F5F4-4387-A8C4-8C7605B8CF88",{"Operator":142,"Negate":15,"CPEMatch":157},[158],{"Vulnerable":15,"Criteria":60,"MatchCriteriaID":159,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"C21B7018-6D23-4698-8B0F-7C34DCDCF0F2",[],[162,169],{"id":163,"eventType":164,"eventTime":165,"details":166,"label":167,"color":168},"43a935d9-4dd6-449a-a638-4fb4bd3e2187","HIGH_EPSS_DELTA","2026-06-16T04:06:22.537254+00:00","Daily EPSS score increased by 0.287 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Increased","red",{"id":170,"eventType":171,"eventTime":172,"details":173,"label":174,"color":175},"13cb6449-5d98-4b90-85ba-b39723564d6f","LOW_EPSS_DELTA","2026-08-24T04:06:52.918174+00:00","Daily EPSS score decreased by 0.484 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Decreased","green",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":177,"version":33},1792270526685,{"score":179,"band":180,"action":181,"scoredAt":182},59,"Medium","Plan remediation","2026-10-16T06:43:03.176401+00:00"]