[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f9WZopgaZTz-yBkD0ojNWDJkUaX3hTMEE44Sw4epWQsI":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2019-12928":124},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":122},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":37,"epssPercentile":15,"epssTimeSeries":38,"severity":39,"affectedProducts":40,"affectedProductsCount":45,"references":46,"referencesCount":45,"weaknesses":53,"weaknessesCount":69,"isActivelyExploited":70,"cisaInfo":15,"otxData":15,"relatedBlogPosts":71,"seoMetadata":72,"configurations":97,"relatedVendorCves":106,"notableEvents":107},"CVE-2019-12928","What is CVE-2019-12928?","The QMP migrate command in QEMU version 4.0.0 and earlier is vulnerable to OS command injection, which allows the remote attacker to achieve code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure by sending a crafted QMP command to the listening server. Note: This has been disputed as a non-issue since QEMU's -qmp interface is meant to be used by trusted users. If one is able to access this interface via a tcp socket open to the internet, then it is an insecure configuration issue","The QMP migrate command in QEMU version 4.0.0 and earlier is vulnerable to OS command injection, which allows the remote attacker to achieve code execution, ...","2019-06-24T11:15:09.367","2024-08-05T00:15:33.197",9.8,"CVSS:3.0\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:N\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:H\u002FA:H",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":30,"CVSSMetricV40":15},null,[17],{"Source":18,"Type":19,"CVSSData":20,"ExploitabilityScore":28,"ImpactScore":29},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":21,"VectorString":13,"AttackVector":22,"AttackComplexity":23,"PrivilegesRequired":24,"UserInteraction":24,"Scope":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":26,"IntegrityImpact":26,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":27,"ExploitCodeMaturity":15,"RemediationLevel":15,"ReportConfidence":15,"TemporalScore":15,"TemporalSeverity":15,"ConfidentialityRequirement":15,"IntegrityRequirement":15,"AvailabilityRequirement":15,"ModifiedAttackVector":15,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":15,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":15,"ModifiedUserInteraction":15,"ModifiedScope":15,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":15,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":15,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":15,"EnvironmentalScore":15,"EnvironmentalSeverity":15},"3.0","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","UNCHANGED","HIGH","CRITICAL",3.9,5.9,[31],{"Source":18,"Type":19,"CVSSData":32,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitabilityScore":36,"ImpactScore":36,"ACInsufInfo":15,"ObtainAllPrivilege":15,"ObtainUserPrivilege":15,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":15,"UserInteractionRequired":15},{"Version":33,"VectorString":34,"AccessVector":22,"AccessComplexity":23,"Authentication":24,"ConfidentialityImpact":35,"IntegrityImpact":35,"AvailabilityImpact":35,"BaseScore":36,"BaseSeverity":15,"Exploitability":15,"RemediationLevel":15,"ReportConfidence":15,"TemporalScore":15,"CollateralDamagePotential":15,"TargetDistribution":15,"ConfidentialityRequirement":15,"IntegrityRequirement":15,"AvailabilityRequirement":15,"EnvironmentalScore":15},"2.0","AV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FAu:N\u002FC:C\u002FI:C\u002FA:C","COMPLETE",10,0.23036,[37,37,37,37,37,37,37],"Critical",[41],{"vendor":42,"product":42,"version":43,"criteria":44,"vulnerable":4},"qemu","*","cpe:2.3:a:qemu:qemu:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",1,[47],{"url":48,"source":49,"tags":50},"https:\u002F\u002Ffakhrizulkifli.github.io\u002Fposts\u002F2019\u002F06\u002F05\u002FCVE-2019-12928\u002F","Github",[51,52],"Exploit","Third Party Advisory",[54,62],{"id":55,"name":56,"description":57,"extendedDescription":58,"status":59,"abstraction":60,"structure":61},"CWE-78","Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')","The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.","This weakness can lead to a vulnerability in environments in which the attacker does not have direct access to the operating system, such as in web applications. Alternately, if the weakness occurs in a privileged program, it could allow the attacker to specify commands that normally would not be accessible, or to call alternate commands with privileges that the attacker does not have. The problem is exacerbated if the compromised process does not follow the principle of least privilege, because the attacker-controlled commands may run with special system privileges that increases the amount of damage.\nThere are at least two subtypes of OS command injection:\nFrom a weakness standpoint, these variants represent distinct programmer errors. In the first variant, the programmer clearly intends that input from untrusted parties will be part of the arguments in the command to be executed. In the second variant, the programmer does not intend for the command to be accessible to any untrusted party, but the programmer probably has not accounted for alternate ways in which malicious attackers can provide input.","Stable","Base","Simple",{"id":63,"name":64,"description":65,"extendedDescription":66,"status":67,"abstraction":68,"structure":61},"CWE-668","Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere","The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.","Resources such as files and directories may be inadvertently exposed through mechanisms such as insecure permissions, or when a program accidentally operates on the wrong object. For example, a program may intend that private files can only be provided to a specific user. This effectively defines a control sphere that is intended to prevent attackers from accessing these private files. If the file permissions are insecure, then parties other than the user will be able to access those files.\nA separate control sphere might effectively require that the user can only access the private files, but not any other files on the system. If the program does not ensure that the user is only requesting private files, then the user might be able to access other files on the system.\nIn either case, the end result is that a resource has been exposed to the wrong party.","Draft","Class",2,false,[],{"title":73,"metaDescription":74,"keywords":75,"canonicalUrl":76,"structuredData":77},"What is CVE-2019-12928? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2019-12928, a critical severity cyber security vulnerability from 2019. The QMP migrate command in QEMU version 4.0.0 and earli...","CVE-2019-12928, CVE-2019-12928 vulnerability, CVE-2019-12928 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2019, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, qemu security, qemu vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2019-12928",{"@context":78,"@type":79,"headline":73,"description":74,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":80,"publisher":84,"about":88,"mainEntityOfPage":92,"articleSection":95,"keywords":96},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":81,"name":82,"url":83},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":81,"name":82,"url":83,"logo":85},{"@type":86,"url":87},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":89,"name":6,"description":90,"additionalType":91},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":93,"@id":94},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2019-12928","Cybersecurity","CVE-2019-12928, CVE-2019-12928 vulnerability, CVE-2019-12928 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[98],{"Operator":15,"Negate":15,"Nodes":99},[100],{"Operator":101,"Negate":15,"CPEMatch":102},"OR",[103],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":44,"MatchCriteriaID":104,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":105},"692D776F-B51C-42D8-B02D-D69FEEF13FB1","4.0.0",[],[108,115],{"id":109,"eventType":110,"eventTime":111,"details":112,"label":113,"color":114},"4d29bf38-d6ce-41b3-9df2-a3f3ced6058b","HIGH_EPSS_DELTA","2025-10-09T04:06:32.732252+00:00","Daily EPSS score increased by 0.493 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Increased","red",{"id":116,"eventType":117,"eventTime":118,"details":119,"label":120,"color":121},"78557117-69fa-4780-a46c-6e6bc966ab97","LOW_EPSS_DELTA","2026-06-16T04:06:06.595093+00:00","Daily EPSS score decreased by 0.311 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Decreased","green",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":123,"version":33},1792364681340,{"score":125,"band":126,"action":127,"scoredAt":128},63,"Medium","Plan remediation","2026-10-16T06:46:22.606769+00:00"]