[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fwbAHgZGoUhRsf_FsSu4A6BYq9LIO7zi6m-ikL-4IoD8":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2019-1627":133},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":131},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":47,"epssPercentile":27,"epssTimeSeries":48,"severity":49,"affectedProducts":50,"affectedProductsCount":60,"references":61,"referencesCount":60,"weaknesses":73,"weaknessesCount":60,"isActivelyExploited":88,"cisaInfo":27,"otxData":27,"relatedBlogPosts":89,"seoMetadata":90,"configurations":115,"relatedVendorCves":129,"notableEvents":130},"CVE-2019-1627","What is CVE-2019-1627?","A vulnerability in the Server Utilities of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive user information from the configuration data that is stored on the affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient protection of data in the configuration file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by downloading the configuration file. An exploit could allow the attacker to use the sensitive information from the file to elevate privileges.","A vulnerability in the Server Utilities of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized ac...","2019-06-20T03:15:11.48","2020-10-06T19:54:05.74",6.5,"CVSS:3.1\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:L\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:N\u002FA:N",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":30,"CVSSMetricV2":37,"CVSSMetricV40":27},[16],{"Source":17,"Type":18,"CVSSData":19,"ExploitabilityScore":28,"ImpactScore":29},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":20,"VectorString":13,"AttackVector":21,"AttackComplexity":22,"PrivilegesRequired":22,"UserInteraction":23,"Scope":24,"ConfidentialityImpact":25,"IntegrityImpact":23,"AvailabilityImpact":23,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitCodeMaturity":27,"RemediationLevel":27,"ReportConfidence":27,"TemporalScore":27,"TemporalSeverity":27,"ConfidentialityRequirement":27,"IntegrityRequirement":27,"AvailabilityRequirement":23,"ModifiedAttackVector":27,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":27,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":27,"ModifiedUserInteraction":27,"ModifiedScope":27,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":27,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":27,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":27,"EnvironmentalScore":27,"EnvironmentalSeverity":27},"3.1","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","UNCHANGED","HIGH","MEDIUM",null,2.8,3.6,[31],{"Source":32,"Type":33,"CVSSData":34,"ExploitabilityScore":28,"ImpactScore":29},"ykramarz@cisco.com","Secondary",{"Version":35,"VectorString":36,"AttackVector":21,"AttackComplexity":22,"PrivilegesRequired":22,"UserInteraction":23,"Scope":24,"ConfidentialityImpact":25,"IntegrityImpact":23,"AvailabilityImpact":23,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitCodeMaturity":27,"RemediationLevel":27,"ReportConfidence":27,"TemporalScore":27,"TemporalSeverity":27,"ConfidentialityRequirement":27,"IntegrityRequirement":27,"AvailabilityRequirement":27,"ModifiedAttackVector":27,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":27,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":27,"ModifiedUserInteraction":27,"ModifiedScope":27,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":27,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":27,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":27,"EnvironmentalScore":27,"EnvironmentalSeverity":27},"3.0","CVSS:3.0\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:L\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:N\u002FA:N",[38],{"Source":17,"Type":18,"CVSSData":39,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitabilityScore":45,"ImpactScore":46,"ACInsufInfo":27,"ObtainAllPrivilege":27,"ObtainUserPrivilege":27,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":27,"UserInteractionRequired":27},{"Version":40,"VectorString":41,"AccessVector":21,"AccessComplexity":22,"Authentication":42,"ConfidentialityImpact":43,"IntegrityImpact":23,"AvailabilityImpact":23,"BaseScore":44,"BaseSeverity":27,"Exploitability":27,"RemediationLevel":27,"ReportConfidence":27,"TemporalScore":27,"CollateralDamagePotential":27,"TargetDistribution":27,"ConfidentialityRequirement":27,"IntegrityRequirement":27,"AvailabilityRequirement":27,"EnvironmentalScore":27},"2.0","AV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FAu:S\u002FC:P\u002FI:N\u002FA:N","SINGLE","PARTIAL",4,8,2.9,0.01164,[47,47,47,47,47,47,47],"Medium",[51,56],{"vendor":52,"product":53,"version":54,"criteria":55,"vulnerable":4},"cisco","integrated_management_controller","-","cpe:2.3:a:cisco:integrated_management_controller:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":52,"product":57,"version":58,"criteria":59,"vulnerable":4},"unified_computing_system","4.0\\(1c\\)hs3","cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_computing_system:4.0\\(1c\\)hs3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",2,[62,68],{"url":63,"source":64,"tags":65},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Fbid\u002F108847","Securityfocus",[66,67],"Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry",{"url":69,"source":70,"tags":71},"https:\u002F\u002Ftools.cisco.com\u002Fsecurity\u002Fcenter\u002Fcontent\u002FCiscoSecurityAdvisory\u002Fcisco-sa-20190619-imc-infodiscl","Cisco",[72],"Vendor Advisory",[74,82],{"id":75,"name":76,"description":77,"extendedDescription":78,"status":79,"abstraction":80,"structure":81},"CWE-78","Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')","The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.","This weakness can lead to a vulnerability in environments in which the attacker does not have direct access to the operating system, such as in web applications. Alternately, if the weakness occurs in a privileged program, it could allow the attacker to specify commands that normally would not be accessible, or to call alternate commands with privileges that the attacker does not have. The problem is exacerbated if the compromised process does not follow the principle of least privilege, because the attacker-controlled commands may run with special system privileges that increases the amount of damage.\nThere are at least two subtypes of OS command injection:\nFrom a weakness standpoint, these variants represent distinct programmer errors. In the first variant, the programmer clearly intends that input from untrusted parties will be part of the arguments in the command to be executed. In the second variant, the programmer does not intend for the command to be accessible to any untrusted party, but the programmer probably has not accounted for alternate ways in which malicious attackers can provide input.","Stable","Base","Simple",{"id":83,"name":84,"description":85,"extendedDescription":86,"status":87,"abstraction":80,"structure":81},"CWE-312","Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information","The product stores sensitive information in cleartext within a resource that might be accessible to another control sphere.","Because the information is stored in cleartext (i.e., unencrypted), attackers could potentially read it. Even if the information is encoded in a way that is not human-readable, certain techniques could determine which encoding is being used, then decode the information.\nWhen organizations adopt cloud services, it can be easier for attackers to access the data from anywhere on the Internet.\nIn some systems\u002Fenvironments such as cloud, the use of \"double encryption\" (at both the software and hardware layer) might be required, and the developer might be solely responsible for both layers, instead of shared responsibility with the administrator of the broader system\u002Fenvironment.","Draft",false,[],{"title":91,"metaDescription":92,"keywords":93,"canonicalUrl":94,"structuredData":95},"What is CVE-2019-1627? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2019-1627, a medium severity cyber security vulnerability from 2019. A vulnerability in the Server Utilities of Cisco Integrate...","CVE-2019-1627, CVE-2019-1627 vulnerability, CVE-2019-1627 security, medium severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2019, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, cisco security, integrated_management_controller vulnerability, unified_computing_system vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2019-1627",{"@context":96,"@type":97,"headline":91,"description":92,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":98,"publisher":102,"about":106,"mainEntityOfPage":110,"articleSection":113,"keywords":114},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":99,"name":100,"url":101},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":99,"name":100,"url":101,"logo":103},{"@type":104,"url":105},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":107,"name":6,"description":108,"additionalType":109},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":111,"@id":112},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2019-1627","Cybersecurity","CVE-2019-1627, CVE-2019-1627 vulnerability, CVE-2019-1627 security, medium severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[116,123],{"Operator":27,"Negate":27,"Nodes":117},[118],{"Operator":119,"Negate":27,"CPEMatch":120},"OR",[121],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":55,"MatchCriteriaID":122,"VersionStartExcluding":27,"VersionStartIncluding":27,"VersionEndExcluding":27,"VersionEndIncluding":27},"8ED6DD88-BC2C-41F6-B78A-3786817A73D6",{"Operator":27,"Negate":27,"Nodes":124},[125],{"Operator":119,"Negate":27,"CPEMatch":126},[127],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":59,"MatchCriteriaID":128,"VersionStartExcluding":27,"VersionStartIncluding":27,"VersionEndExcluding":27,"VersionEndIncluding":27},"39F8601E-730B-489B-AD2A-FD10FAF28595",[],[],{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":132,"version":40},1792368092772,{"score":134,"band":135,"action":136,"scoredAt":137},25,"Low","Monitor","2026-10-16T06:46:22.585546+00:00"]