[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fLhgWDJvitYmvJlzENZVhYvLb4pQ0dvFdb0lPYieLQl8":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2024-52875":120},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":117},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":32,"epssPercentile":27,"epssTimeSeries":33,"severity":34,"affectedProducts":35,"affectedProductsCount":41,"references":42,"referencesCount":54,"weaknesses":55,"weaknessesCount":41,"isActivelyExploited":64,"cisaInfo":27,"otxData":27,"relatedBlogPosts":65,"seoMetadata":66,"configurations":91,"relatedVendorCves":101,"notableEvents":102},"CVE-2024-52875","What is CVE-2024-52875?","An issue was discovered in GFI Kerio Control 9.2.5 through 9.4.5. The dest GET parameter passed to the \u002Fnonauth\u002FaddCertException.cs and \u002Fnonauth\u002FguestConfirm.cs and \u002Fnonauth\u002Fexpiration.cs pages is not properly sanitized before being used to generate a Location HTTP header in a 302 HTTP response. This can be exploited to perform Open Redirect or HTTP Response Splitting attacks, which in turn lead to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Remote command execution can be achieved by leveraging the upgrade feature in the admin interface.","An issue was discovered in GFI Kerio Control 9.2.5 through 9.4.5. The dest GET parameter passed to the \u002Fnonauth\u002FaddCertException.cs and \u002Fnonauth\u002FguestConfirm...","2025-01-31T08:15:07.827","2025-09-16T17:29:19.553",8.8,"CVSS:3.1\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:N\u002FUI:R\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:H\u002FA:H",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":30,"CVSSMetricV2":31,"CVSSMetricV40":27},[16],{"Source":17,"Type":18,"CVSSData":19,"ExploitabilityScore":28,"ImpactScore":29},"cve@mitre.org","Secondary",{"Version":20,"VectorString":13,"AttackVector":21,"AttackComplexity":22,"PrivilegesRequired":23,"UserInteraction":24,"Scope":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":26,"IntegrityImpact":26,"AvailabilityImpact":26,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitCodeMaturity":27,"RemediationLevel":27,"ReportConfidence":27,"TemporalScore":27,"TemporalSeverity":27,"ConfidentialityRequirement":27,"IntegrityRequirement":27,"AvailabilityRequirement":27,"ModifiedAttackVector":27,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":27,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":27,"ModifiedUserInteraction":27,"ModifiedScope":27,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":27,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":27,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":27,"EnvironmentalScore":27,"EnvironmentalSeverity":27},"3.1","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","REQUIRED","UNCHANGED","HIGH",null,2.8,5.9,[],[],0.29344,[32,32,32,32,32,32,32],"High",[36],{"vendor":37,"product":38,"version":39,"criteria":40,"vulnerable":4},"gfi","kerio_control","*","cpe:2.3:a:gfi:kerio_control:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",1,[43,49],{"url":44,"source":45,"tags":46},"https:\u002F\u002Fkarmainsecurity.com\u002Fhacking-kerio-control-via-cve-2024-52875","Karmainsecurity",[47,48],"Exploit","Third Party Advisory",{"url":50,"source":51,"tags":52},"http:\u002F\u002Fseclists.org\u002Ffulldisclosure\u002F2024\u002FDec\u002F15","Seclists",[47,53,48],"Mailing List",2,[56],{"id":57,"name":58,"description":59,"extendedDescription":60,"status":61,"abstraction":62,"structure":63},"CWE-113","Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request\u002FResponse Splitting')","The product receives data from an HTTP agent\u002Fcomponent (e.g., web server, proxy, browser, etc.), but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CR and LF characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers.","HTTP agents or components may include a web server, load balancer, reverse proxy, web caching proxy, application firewall, web browser, etc. Regardless of the role, they are expected to maintain coherent, consistent HTTP communication state across all components. However, including unexpected data in an HTTP header allows an attacker to specify the entirety of the HTTP message that is rendered by the client HTTP agent (e.g., web browser) or back-end HTTP agent (e.g., web server), whether the message is part of a request or a response.\nWhen an HTTP request contains unexpected CR and LF characters, the server may respond with an output stream that is interpreted as \"splitting\" the stream into two different HTTP messages instead of one. CR is carriage return, also given by %0d or \\r, and LF is line feed, also given by %0a or \\n.\nIn addition to CR and LF characters, other valid\u002FRFC compliant special characters and unique character encodings can be utilized, such as HT (horizontal tab, also given by %09 or \\t) and SP (space, also given as + sign or %20).\nThese types of unvalidated and unexpected data in HTTP message headers allow an attacker to control the second \"split\" message to mount attacks such as server-side request forgery, cross-site scripting, and cache poisoning attacks.\nHTTP response splitting weaknesses may be present when:","Incomplete","Variant","Simple",false,[],{"title":67,"metaDescription":68,"keywords":69,"canonicalUrl":70,"structuredData":71},"What is CVE-2024-52875? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | Precursor Intelligence","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2024-52875, a high severity cyber security vulnerability from 2025. An issue was discovered in GFI Kerio Control 9.2.5 through ...","CVE-2024-52875, CVE-2024-52875 vulnerability, CVE-2024-52875 security, high severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2025, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, gfi security, kerio_control vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2024-52875",{"@context":72,"@type":73,"headline":67,"description":68,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":74,"publisher":78,"about":82,"mainEntityOfPage":86,"articleSection":89,"keywords":90},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":75,"name":76,"url":77},"Organization","Precursor Intelligence","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com",{"@type":75,"name":76,"url":77,"logo":79},{"@type":80,"url":81},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Feplogo.png",{"@type":83,"name":6,"description":84,"additionalType":85},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":87,"@id":88},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fprecursorintelligence.com\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2024-52875","Cybersecurity","CVE-2024-52875, CVE-2024-52875 vulnerability, CVE-2024-52875 security, high severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[92],{"Operator":27,"Negate":27,"Nodes":93},[94],{"Operator":95,"Negate":64,"CPEMatch":96},"OR",[97],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":40,"MatchCriteriaID":98,"VersionStartExcluding":27,"VersionStartIncluding":99,"VersionEndExcluding":27,"VersionEndIncluding":100},"2932E0F8-FE93-4D0C-B654-5FEFE718C6D5","9.2.5","9.4.5",[],[103,110],{"id":104,"eventType":105,"eventTime":106,"details":107,"label":108,"color":109},"95388c57-967d-4dfb-bf5d-d345bbb87861","HIGH_EPSS_DELTA","2025-06-11T10:09:51.475596+00:00","Daily EPSS score increased by 0.589 on 2025-02-02","EPSS Score Increased","red",{"id":111,"eventType":112,"eventTime":113,"details":114,"label":115,"color":116},"97bd3922-bbea-4b1f-8fa5-a3d8e6bec06b","LOW_EPSS_DELTA","2025-11-19T04:04:22.795527+00:00","Daily EPSS score decreased by 0.155 on 2025-02-02","EPSS Score Decreased","green",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":118,"version":119},1792364699072,"2.0",{"score":121,"band":34,"action":122,"scoredAt":123},81,"Emergency patch","2026-10-16T07:05:41.89973+00:00"]