Gpl Ghostscript vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.

Product230 versions
The short answer

Gpl Ghostscript is made by Artifex. We track 16 published vulnerabilities in it, across 230 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Gpl Ghostscript, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.

See the riskiest flaws

We keep watching the known-exploited list.

Known exploited

Which Gpl Ghostscript vulnerabilities are being exploited?

This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.

None of Gpl Ghostscript's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.

Exploit likelihood

Which Gpl Ghostscript flaws are most likely to be used?

Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.

50% or more10% to 49%Under 10%
  1. 92%

    An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24.

    CVSS7.8Published5 Sep 2018
  2. 16%

    Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors involving the 1Policy operator.

    CVSS8.6Published19 Oct 2018
  3. 9.2%

    Stack-based buffer overflow in the parser function in GhostScript 8.70 and 8.64 allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PostScript file.

    CVSS9.3Published12 May 2010
  4. 6.8%

    Off-by-one error in the Ins_MINDEX function in the TrueType bytecode interpreter in Ghostscript before 8.71 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via...

    CVSS9.3Published26 Aug 2010
  5. 6.6%

    Buffer overflow in gs/psi/iscan.c in Ghostscript 8.64 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted PDF document containing a long name.

    CVSS9.3Published22 Jul 2010
  6. 4.3%

    Heap-based buffer overflow in gdevwpr2.c in Ghostscript 9.04, when processing the OutputFile device parameter, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long file name in a PostScript document.

    CVSS9.3Published6 Sep 2012
  7. 4.0%

    Ghostscript 8.64, 8.70, and possibly other versions allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PostScript file containing unlimited recursive procedure invocations, which trigger memory...

    CVSS9.3Published19 May 2010
  8. 3.0%

    In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the LockDistillerParams parameter to crash the interpreter or execute code.

    CVSS7.8Published27 Aug 2018
  9. 3.0%

    In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript could use uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code.

    CVSS7.8Published28 Aug 2018
Precursor Intelligence

Running Gpl Ghostscript? We'll keep checking.

Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.

  1. Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
  2. We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
  3. Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
  4. Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.

Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.

FAQ

Common questions, answered plainly.

Something else? Talk to the team →

We track 16 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Gpl Ghostscript, across 230 versions.

None of Gpl Ghostscript's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.

Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Gpl Ghostscript. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.