FortiClient vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
FortiClient is made by Fortinet. We track 75 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 123 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. Fortinet lists newer releases under their own names, such as FortiClient Enterprise Management Server, so check those pages too.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Is FortiClient listed under other names? Yes.
Fortinet also lists FortiClient under more specific names, such as FortiClient Enterprise Management Server and FortiClient Endpoint Management Server. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.
- FortiClient Enterprise Management Server7 published vulnerabilities
- FortiClient Endpoint Management Server6 published vulnerabilities
- FortiClient Sslvpn Client2 published vulnerabilities
- FortiClient SSL VPN1 published vulnerability
- FortiClient Emergency Management Server1 published vulnerability
- FortiClient Virtual Private Network1 published vulnerability
- FortiClient Host Security1 published vulnerability
- FortiClient Lite1 published vulnerability
Which FortiClient vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of FortiClient's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which FortiClient flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 4.1%CVE-2024-3661High
DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121).
- 2.2%CVE-2019-17658Critical
An unquoted service path vulnerability in the FortiClient FortiTray component of FortiClientWindows v6.2.2 and prior allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges via the FortiClientConsole executable service path.
- 2.1%CVE-2015-5736High
The Fortishield.sys driver in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 allows local users to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges by setting the callback function in a (1) 0x220024 or (2) 0x220028 ioctl call.
- 2.1%CVE-2017-14184High
An Information Disclosure vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClient for Windows 5.6.0 and below versions, FortiClient for Mac OSX 5.6.0 and below versions and FortiClient SSLVPN Client for Linux 4.4.2334 and below...
- 1.8%CVE-2017-7344High
A privilege escalation in Fortinet FortiClient Windows 5.4.3 and earlier as well as 5.6.0 allows attacker to gain privilege via exploiting the Windows "security alert" dialog thereby popping up when the "VPN before...
- 1.8%CVE-2005-4570High
The Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementations in Fortinet FortiOS 2.50, 2.80 and 3.0, FortiClient 2.0,; and FortiManager 2.80 and 3.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (termination of...
- 1.8%CVE-2016-8493High
In FortiClientWindows 5.4.1 and 5.4.2, an attacker may escalate privilege via a FortiClientNamedPipe vulnerability.
- 1.6%CVE-2018-9195Medium
Use of a hardcoded cryptographic key in the FortiGuard services communication protocol may allow a Man in the middle with knowledge of the key to eavesdrop on and modify information (URL/SPAM services in FortiOS 5.6,...
- 1.5%CVE-2023-45590Critical
An improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Fortinet FortiClientLinux version 7.2.0, 7.0.6 through 7.0.10 and 7.0.3 through 7.0.4 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via...
- 1.4%CVE-2019-17652Medium
A stack buffer overflow vulnerability in FortiClient for Linux 6.2.1 and below may allow a user with low privilege to cause FortiClient processes running under root priviledge crashes via sending specially crafted...
Running FortiClient? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN.
- Matched to
- FortiClient on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 75 published vulnerabilities listed under the name FortiClient, across 123 versions.
None of FortiClient's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Fortinet also lists FortiClient under more specific names, such as FortiClient Enterprise Management Server and FortiClient Endpoint Management Server. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track FortiClient. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.