Glusterfs vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Glusterfs is made by Gluster. We track 23 published vulnerabilities in it, across 167 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Glusterfs, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Glusterfs vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Glusterfs's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Glusterfs flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 3.4%CVE-2018-10907High
It was found that glusterfs server is vulnerable to multiple stack based buffer overflows due to functions in server-rpc-fopc.c allocating fixed size buffers using 'alloca(3)'.
- 3.3%CVE-2018-10929High
A flaw was found in RPC request using gfs2_create_req in glusterfs server.
- 3.1%CVE-2018-10911High
A flaw was found in the way dic_unserialize function of glusterfs does not handle negative key length values.
- 3.0%CVE-2018-10904High
It was found that glusterfs server does not properly sanitize file paths in the "trusted.io-stats-dump" extended attribute which is used by the "debug/io-stats" translator.
- 2.8%CVE-2018-10927High
A flaw was found in RPC request using gfs3_lookup_req in glusterfs server.
- 2.7%CVE-2014-3619Medium
The __socket_proto_state_machine function in GlusterFS 3.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a "00000000" fragment header.
- 2.7%CVE-2018-10928High
A flaw was found in RPC request using gfs3_symlink_req in glusterfs server which allows symlink destinations to point to file paths outside of the gluster volume.
- 2.7%CVE-2018-14661Medium
It was found that usage of snprintf function in feature/locks translator of glusterfs server 3.8.4, as shipped with Red Hat Gluster Storage, was vulnerable to a format string attack.
- 2.6%CVE-2018-10926High
A flaw was found in RPC request using gfs3_mknod_req supported by glusterfs server.
Running Glusterfs? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
It was found that glusterfs server is vulnerable to multiple stack based buffer overflows due to functions in server-rpc-fopc.c allocating fixed size buffers using 'alloca(3)'. An authenticated attacker could exploit this by mounting a gluster volume and sending a string longer that the fixed buffer size to cause crash or potential code execution.
- Matched to
- Glusterfs on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 23 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Glusterfs, across 167 versions.
None of Glusterfs's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Glusterfs. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.