Zebra vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Zebra is made by Gnu. We track 3 published vulnerabilities in it, across 5 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Zebra, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Zebra vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Zebra's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Zebra flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 8.4%CVE-2003-0795Medium
The vty layer in Quagga before 0.96.4, and Zebra 0.93b and earlier, does not verify that sub-negotiation is taking place when processing the SE marker, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service...
- 0.4%CVE-2003-0859Medium
The getifaddrs function in GNU libc (glibc) 2.2.4 and earlier allows local users to cause a denial of service by sending spoofed messages as other users to the kernel netlink interface.
- 0.4%
Zebra 0.93b and earlier, and quagga before 0.95, allows local users to cause a denial of service by sending spoofed messages as other users to the kernel netlink interface.
Running Zebra? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
The vty layer in Quagga before 0.96.4, and Zebra 0.93b and earlier, does not verify that sub-negotiation is taking place when processing the SE marker, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed telnet command to the telnet CLI port, which may trigger a null dereference.
- Matched to
- Zebra on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 3 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Zebra, across 5 versions.
None of Zebra's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Zebra. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.