Atom C3338r Firmware vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Atom C3338r Firmware is made by Intel. We track 10 published vulnerabilities in it, across 0 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Atom C3338r Firmware, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Atom C3338r Firmware vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Atom C3338r Firmware's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Atom C3338r Firmware flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 0.3%CVE-2022-21233Medium
Improper isolation of shared resources in some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
- 0.3%CVE-2021-0124Medium
Improper access control in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.
- 0.3%CVE-2021-0116High
Out-of-bounds write in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
- 0.3%CVE-2021-0117High
Pointer issues in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
- 0.3%CVE-2021-0125Medium
Improper initialization in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.
- 0.3%CVE-2021-0156High
Improper input validation in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
- 0.3%CVE-2021-0118Medium
Out-of-bounds read in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access.
- 0.3%CVE-2021-0119Medium
Improper initialization in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via physical access.
- 0.2%CVE-2022-43505Medium
Insufficient control flow management in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access.
- 0.2%CVE-2022-37343Medium
Improper access control in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
Running Atom C3338r Firmware? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
Improper isolation of shared resources in some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
- Matched to
- Atom C3338r Firmware on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 10 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Atom C3338r Firmware, across 0 versions.
None of Atom C3338r Firmware's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Atom C3338r Firmware. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.