Expresscluster X vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Expresscluster X is made by Nec. We track 19 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 13 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. Nec lists newer releases under their own names, such as Expresscluster X Singleserversafe, so check those pages too.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Is Expresscluster X listed under other names? Yes.
Nec also lists Expresscluster X under more specific names, such as Expresscluster X Singleserversafe. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.
Which Expresscluster X vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Expresscluster X's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Expresscluster X flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 69%CVE-2020-17408High
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of NEC ExpressCluster 4.1.
- 3.8%CVE-2016-1145High
Directory traversal vulnerability in WebManager in NEC EXPRESSCLUSTER X through 3.3 11.31 on Windows and through 3.3 3.3.1-1 on Linux and Solaris allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
- 2.2%CVE-2021-20702Critical
Buffer overflow vulnerability in the Transaction Server CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier,...
- 2.1%CVE-2021-20701Critical
Buffer overflow vulnerability in the Disk Agent CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3...
- 2.1%CVE-2021-20700Critical
Buffer overflow vulnerability in the Disk Agent CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3...
- 2.1%CVE-2021-20703Critical
Buffer overflow vulnerability in the Transaction Server CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier,...
- 2.1%CVE-2021-20704Critical
Buffer overflow vulnerability in the compatible API with previous versions CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 4.3 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 4.3 SingleServerSafe for Windows and...
- 1.5%CVE-2022-34822Critical
Path traversal vulnerability in CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 SingleServerSafe...
- 1.4%CVE-2022-34823Critical
Buffer overflow vulnerability in CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0...
- 1.3%CVE-2022-34825Critical
Uncontrolled Search Path Element in CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0 for Windows and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X 5.0 SingleServerSafe for Windows and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.0...
Running Expresscluster X? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of NEC ExpressCluster 4.1. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the clpwebmc executable. Due to the improper restriction of XML External Entity (XXE) references, a specially-crafted document specifying a URI causes the XML parser to access the URI and embed the contents back into the XML document for further processing. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose information in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-10801.
- Matched to
- Expresscluster X on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 19 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Expresscluster X, across 13 versions.
None of Expresscluster X's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Nec also lists Expresscluster X under more specific names, such as Expresscluster X Singleserversafe. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Expresscluster X. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.