Clustered Data Ontap vulnerabilitiesAnd the versions its exploited flaws hit.

Product1 known exploited41 versions
The short answer

Clustered Data Ontap is made by Netapp. We track 190 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 41 versions. 1 of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited, the newest added on 1 December 2021. Netapp lists newer releases under their own names, such as Clustered Data Ontap Antivirus Connector, so check those pages too.

Check your version

The most recent Clustered Data Ontap flaw added to the known-exploited list is CVE-2021-40438, on 1 December 2021. We keep watching the known-exploited list.

Other names

Is Clustered Data Ontap listed under other names? Yes.

Netapp also lists Clustered Data Ontap under more specific names, such as Clustered Data Ontap Antivirus Connector. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.

Versions

Which versions of Clustered Data Ontap do the exploited flaws hit?

Each exploited flaw lists the versions it affects, as published by the vendor. Find your version, then patch.

Known exploited

Which Clustered Data Ontap vulnerabilities are being exploited?

1 flaw is on the government list of vulnerabilities known to be exploited. These are the ones criminals are using now, so they go first, whatever their severity score says.

  1. 9.0
    CVE-2021-40438CriticalKnown exploited
    Apache HTTP Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

    A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user.

    Chance of use>99%Known exploited since1 Dec 2021
Exploit likelihood

Which Clustered Data Ontap flaws are most likely to be used?

Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.

50% or more10% to 49%Under 10%
  1. >99%
    CVE-2021-40438CriticalKnown exploited

    A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user.

    CVSS9.0Published16 Sep 2021
  2. 91%

    A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking.

    CVSS7.5Published1 Nov 2022
  3. 90%

    Apache HTTP server 2.4.32 to 2.4.44 mod_proxy_uwsgi info disclosure and possible RCE

    CVSS9.8Published7 Aug 2020
  4. 90%

    If Apache HTTP Server 2.4.53 is configured to do transformations with mod_sed in contexts where the input to mod_sed may be very large, mod_sed may make excessively large memory allocations and trigger an abort.

    CVSS7.5Published9 Jun 2022
  5. 88%

    In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt().

    CVSS9.8Published24 Aug 2021
  6. 85%

    In Apache httpd 2.4.0 to 2.4.29, the expression specified in <FilesMatch> could match '$' to a newline character in a malicious filename, rather than matching only the end of the filename.

    CVSS8.1Published26 Mar 2018
  7. 83%

    The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection.

    CVSS7.3Published3 May 2022
  8. 82%

    Crypto-NAK packets in ntpd in NTP 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4, and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication.

    CVSS9.8Published7 Aug 2017
  9. 81%

    In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page.

    CVSS6.1Published26 Sep 2019
Precursor Intelligence

Running Clustered Data Ontap? We'll keep checking.

Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.

  1. Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
  2. We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
  3. Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
  4. Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.

Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.

FAQ

Common questions, answered plainly.

Something else? Talk to the team →

We track 190 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Clustered Data Ontap, across 41 versions. The most recent Clustered Data Ontap flaw added to the known-exploited list is CVE-2021-40438, on 1 December 2021.

1 is on the list of flaws known to be exploited. The most recently added is CVE-2021-40438.

Netapp also lists Clustered Data Ontap under more specific names, such as Clustered Data Ontap Antivirus Connector. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.

Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Clustered Data Ontap. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.