Hci Storage Node vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Hci Storage Node is made by Netapp. We track 39 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 0 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. Netapp lists newer releases under their own names, such as Hci Storage Node BIOS, so check those pages too.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Is Hci Storage Node listed under other names? Yes.
Netapp also lists Hci Storage Node under more specific names, such as Hci Storage Node BIOS and Hci Storage Node Firmware. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.
Which Hci Storage Node vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Hci Storage Node's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Hci Storage Node flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 14%CVE-2020-15778High
scp in OpenSSH through 8.3p1 allows command injection in the scp.c toremote function, as demonstrated by backtick characters in the destination argument.
- 9.8%CVE-2020-8285High
curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack overflow issue in FTP wildcard match parsing.
- 8.6%CVE-2007-2768Medium
OpenSSH, when using OPIE (One-Time Passwords in Everything) for PAM, allows remote attackers to determine the existence of certain user accounts, which displays a different response if the user account exists and is...
- 7.5%CVE-2016-9841Critical
inffast.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic.
- 7.1%CVE-2020-1971Medium
The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names.
- 6.4%CVE-2020-26116High
http.client in Python 3.x before 3.5.10, 3.6.x before 3.6.12, 3.7.x before 3.7.9, and 3.8.x before 3.8.5 allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP request method, as demonstrated by inserting CR and LF...
- 5.3%CVE-2021-22876Medium
curl 7.1.1 to and including 7.75.0 is vulnerable to an "Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor" by leaking credentials in the HTTP Referer: header.
- 5.1%CVE-2019-19050High
A memory leak in the crypto_reportstat() function in crypto/crypto_user_stat.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering...
- 4.6%CVE-2020-8286High
curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response.
Running Hci Storage Node? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization.
- Matched to
- Hci Storage Node on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 39 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Hci Storage Node, across 0 versions.
None of Hci Storage Node's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Netapp also lists Hci Storage Node under more specific names, such as Hci Storage Node BIOS and Hci Storage Node Firmware. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Hci Storage Node. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.