Routinator vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Routinator is made by Nlnetlabs. We track 9 published vulnerabilities in it, across 28 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Routinator, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Routinator vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Routinator's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Routinator flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 1.5%CVE-2021-43173High
In NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.2, a validation run can be delayed significantly by an RRDP repository by not answering but slowly drip-feeding bytes to keep the connection alive.
- 1.3%CVE-2021-43172High
NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.2 happily processes a chain of RRDP repositories of infinite length causing it to never finish a validation run.
- 1.2%CVE-2021-43174High
NLnet Labs Routinator versions 0.9.0 up to and including 0.10.1, support the gzip transfer encoding when querying RRDP repositories.
- 1.0%CVE-2024-1622High
Due to a mistake in error checking, Routinator will terminate when an incoming RTR connection is reset by the peer too quickly after opening.
- 0.9%CVE-2022-3029High
In NLnet Labs Routinator 0.9.0 up to and including 0.11.2, due to a mistake in error handling, data in RRDP snapshot and delta files that isn’t correctly base 64 encoded is treated as a fatal error and causes...
- 0.9%CVE-2021-41531High
NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.0 produces invalid RTR payload if an RPKI CA uses too large values in the max-length parameter in a ROA.
- 0.7%CVE-2020-17366High
An issue was discovered in NLnet Labs Routinator 0.1.0 through 0.7.1.
- 0.6%CVE-2023-39916Critical
NLnet Labs’ Routinator 0.9.0 up to and including 0.12.1 as well as 0.14.0 up to and including 0.14.2 contains a possible path traversal vulnerability in the optional, off-by-default keep-rrdp-responses feature that...
- 0.6%CVE-2023-39915High
NLnet Labs' Routinator up to and including version 0.12.1 may crash when trying to parse certain malformed RPKI objects.
Running Routinator? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
In NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.2, a validation run can be delayed significantly by an RRDP repository by not answering but slowly drip-feeding bytes to keep the connection alive. This can be used to effectively stall validation. While Routinator has a configurable time-out value for RRDP connections, this time-out was only applied to individual read or write operations rather than the complete request. Thus, if an RRDP repository sends a little bit of data before that time-out expired, it can continuously extend the time it takes for the request to finish. Since validation will only continue once the update of an RRDP repository has concluded, this delay will cause validation to stall, leading to Routinator continuing to serve the old data set or, if in the initial validation run directly after starting, never serve any data at all.
- Matched to
- Routinator on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 9 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Routinator, across 28 versions.
None of Routinator's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Routinator. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.