Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit is made by Opensuse Project. We track 13 published vulnerabilities in it, across 2 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 4.9%CVE-2014-9846Critical
Buffer overflow in the ReadRLEImage function in coders/rle.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact.
- 4.6%CVE-2014-9847Critical
The jng decoder in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact.
- 3.9%CVE-2014-9841Critical
The ReadPSDLayers function in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors, related to "throwing of exceptions."
- 3.9%CVE-2014-9843Critical
The DecodePSDPixels function in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.
- 3.7%CVE-2014-9848High
Memory leak in ImageMagick allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption).
- 3.7%CVE-2014-9851High
ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash).
- 3.6%CVE-2014-9850High
Logic error in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption).
- 3.6%CVE-2014-9849High
The png coder in ImageMagick allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash).
- 3.6%CVE-2014-9842High
Memory leak in the ReadPSDLayers function in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via unspecified vectors.
- 3.5%CVE-2014-4258Medium
Unspecified vulnerability in the MySQL Server component in Oracle MySQL 5.5.37 and earlier and 5.6.17 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors...
Running Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
Buffer overflow in the ReadRLEImage function in coders/rle.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact.
- Matched to
- Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 13 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit, across 2 versions.
None of Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.