Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.

Product1 versions
The short answer

Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension is made by Opensuse Project. We track 11 published vulnerabilities in it, across 1 version. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.

See the riskiest flaws

We keep watching the known-exploited list.

Known exploited

Which Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension vulnerabilities are being exploited?

This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.

None of Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.

Exploit likelihood

Which Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension flaws are most likely to be used?

Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.

50% or more10% to 49%Under 10%
  1. 4.9%

    Buffer overflow in the ReadRLEImage function in coders/rle.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact.

    CVSS9.8Published20 Mar 2017
  2. 4.6%

    The jng decoder in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact.

    CVSS9.8Published20 Mar 2017
  3. 3.9%

    The ReadPSDLayers function in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors, related to "throwing of exceptions."

    CVSS9.8Published20 Mar 2017
  4. 3.9%

    The DecodePSDPixels function in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

    CVSS9.8Published20 Mar 2017
  5. 3.7%

    Memory leak in ImageMagick allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption).

    CVSS7.5Published20 Mar 2017
  6. 3.7%

    ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash).

    CVSS7.5Published20 Mar 2017
  7. 3.6%

    Memory leak in the ReadPSDLayers function in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via unspecified vectors.

    CVSS7.5Published20 Mar 2017
  8. 3.6%

    The png coder in ImageMagick allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash).

    CVSS7.5Published20 Mar 2017
  9. 3.6%

    Logic error in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption).

    CVSS7.5Published20 Mar 2017
  10. 2.1%

    The ReadRLEImage function in coders/rle.c in ImageMagick 6.8.9.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via a crafted image file.

    CVSS5.5Published20 Mar 2017
Precursor Intelligence

Running Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension? We'll keep checking.

Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.

  1. Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
  2. We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
  3. Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
  4. Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.

Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.

FAQ

Common questions, answered plainly.

Something else? Talk to the team →

We track 11 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension, across 1 version.

None of Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.

Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Suse Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.