Xtrabackup vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Xtrabackup is made by Percona. We track 6 published vulnerabilities in it, across 112 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Xtrabackup, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Xtrabackup vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Xtrabackup's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Xtrabackup flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 1.2%CVE-2015-1027Medium
The version checking subroutine in percona-toolkit before 2.2.13 and xtrabackup before 2.2.9 was vulnerable to silent HTTP downgrade attacks and Man In The Middle attacks in which the server response could be...
- 1.1%CVE-2016-6225Medium
xbcrypt in Percona XtraBackup before 2.3.6 and 2.4.x before 2.4.5 does not properly set the initialization vector (IV) for encryption, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive...
- 1.0%CVE-2022-26944Medium
Percona XtraBackup 2.4.20 unintentionally writes the command line to any resulting backup file output.
- 1.0%CVE-2020-10997Medium
Percona XtraBackup before 2.4.20 unintentionally writes the command line to any resulting backup file output.
- 0.5%CVE-2022-25834High
In Percona XtraBackup (PXB) through 2.2.24 and 3.x through 8.0.27-19, a crafted filename on the local file system could trigger unexpected command shell execution of arbitrary commands.
- 0.4%
Percona XtraBackup before 2.1.6 uses a constant string for the initialization vector (IV), which makes it easier for local users to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms and conduct plaintext attacks.
Running Xtrabackup? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
The version checking subroutine in percona-toolkit before 2.2.13 and xtrabackup before 2.2.9 was vulnerable to silent HTTP downgrade attacks and Man In The Middle attacks in which the server response could be modified to allow the attacker to respond with modified command payload and have the client return additional running configuration information leading to an information disclosure of running configuration of MySQL.
- Matched to
- Xtrabackup on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 6 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Xtrabackup, across 112 versions.
None of Xtrabackup's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Xtrabackup. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.