Qpopper vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.

Product43 versions
The short answer

Qpopper is made by Qualcomm. We track 14 published vulnerabilities in it, across 43 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Qpopper, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.

See the riskiest flaws

We keep watching the known-exploited list.

Known exploited

Which Qpopper vulnerabilities are being exploited?

This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.

None of Qpopper's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.

Exploit likelihood

Which Qpopper flaws are most likely to be used?

Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.

50% or more10% to 49%Under 10%
  1. 12%

    Buffer overflow in POP servers based on BSD/Qualcomm's qpopper allows remote attackers to gain root access using a long PASS command.

    CVSS9.8Published14 Jul 1998
  2. 8.6%

    The pop_msg function in qpopper 4.0.x before 4.0.5fc2 does not null terminate a message buffer after a call to Qvsnprintf, which could allow authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a buffer overflow in a...

    CVSS10.0Published18 Mar 2003
  3. 5.2%

    Qpopper (aka in.qpopper or popper) 4.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a very large string, which causes an infinite loop.

    CVSS5.0Published12 Aug 2002
  4. 4.9%

    Buffer overflow in Qpopper (qpop) 3.0 allows remote root access via AUTH command.

    CVSS10.0Published30 Nov 1999
  5. 3.3%

    Qpopper 2.53 and earlier allows local users to gain privileges via a formatting string in the From: header, which is processed by the euidl command.

    CVSS7.5Published24 May 2000
  6. 1.9%

    Buffer overflow in qpopper (aka qpop or popper) 4.0 through 4.0.2 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via a long username.

    CVSS10.0Published2 Jun 2001
  7. 1.2%

    Qpopper 2.53 and 3.0 does not properly identify the \n string which identifies the end of message text, which allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service or corrupt mailboxes via a message line that is 1023...

    CVSS5.0Published21 Apr 2000
  8. 1.1%

    qpopper 4.01 with PAM based authentication on Red Hat systems generates different error messages when an invalid username is provided instead of a valid name, which allows remote attackers to determine valid...

    CVSS5.0Published31 Aug 2001
  9. 0.6%

    poppassd in Qualcomm qpopper 4.0.8 allows local users to modify arbitrary files and gain privileges via the -t (trace file) command line argument.

    CVSS4.6Published28 Sep 2005
  10. 0.5%

    Untrusted search path vulnerability in Qualcomm qpopper 4.0 through 4.05 allows local users to execute arbitrary code by modifying the PATH environment variable to reference a malicious smbpasswd program.

    CVSS3.6Published31 Dec 2003
Precursor Intelligence

Running Qpopper? We'll keep checking.

Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.

  1. Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
  2. We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
  3. Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
  4. Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.

Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.

FAQ

Common questions, answered plainly.

Something else? Talk to the team →

We track 14 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Qpopper, across 43 versions.

None of Qpopper's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.

Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Qpopper. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.