Ceph vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Ceph is made by Red Hat. We track 16 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 329 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. Red Hat lists newer releases under their own names, such as Ceph Storage, so check those pages too.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Is Ceph listed under other names? Yes.
Red Hat also lists Ceph under more specific names, such as Ceph Storage and Ceph Storage Mon. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.
Which Ceph vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Ceph's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Ceph flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 2.9%CVE-2018-7262High
In Ceph before 12.2.3 and 13.x through 13.0.1, the rgw_civetweb.cc RGWCivetWeb::init_env function in radosgw doesn't handle malformed HTTP headers properly, allowing for denial of service.
- 2.5%CVE-2016-5009Medium
The handle_command function in mon/Monitor.cc in Ceph allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and ceph monitor crash) via an (1) empty or (2) crafted prefix.
- 2.4%CVE-2020-27839Medium
A flaw was found in ceph-dashboard. The JSON Web Token (JWT) used for user authentication is stored by the frontend application in the browser’s localStorage which is potentially vulnerable to attackers via XSS attacks.
- 2.4%CVE-2021-3531Medium
A flaw was found in the Red Hat Ceph Storage RGW in versions before 14.2.21.
- 2.3%CVE-2017-16818Medium
RADOS Gateway in Ceph 12.1.0 through 12.2.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and application exit) by leveraging "full" (not necessarily admin) privileges to post an...
- 2.3%CVE-2016-8626Medium
A flaw was found in Red Hat Ceph before 0.94.9-8.
- 2.1%CVE-2018-16846Medium
It was found in Ceph versions before 13.2.4 that authenticated ceph RGW users can cause a denial of service against OMAPs holding bucket indices.
- 1.9%CVE-2015-5245Medium
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Ceph Object Gateway (aka radosgw or RGW) in Ceph before 0.94.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted...
- 1.6%CVE-2021-3524Medium
A flaw was found in the Red Hat Ceph Storage RadosGW (Ceph Object Gateway) in versions before 14.2.21.
- 1.4%CVE-2018-1128High
It was found that cephx authentication protocol did not verify ceph clients correctly and was vulnerable to replay attack.
Running Ceph? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
In Ceph before 12.2.3 and 13.x through 13.0.1, the rgw_civetweb.cc RGWCivetWeb::init_env function in radosgw doesn't handle malformed HTTP headers properly, allowing for denial of service.
- Matched to
- Ceph on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 16 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Ceph, across 329 versions.
None of Ceph's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Red Hat also lists Ceph under more specific names, such as Ceph Storage and Ceph Storage Mon. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Ceph. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.