Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian vulnerabilitiesAnd the versions its exploited flaws hit.
Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian is made by Red Hat. We track 11 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 4 versions. 2 of them are on the list of flaws known to be exploited, the newest added on 2 June 2026. Red Hat lists newer releases under their own names, such as Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian Eus, so check those pages too.
The most recent Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian flaw added to the known-exploited list is CVE-2022-0492, on 2 June 2026. We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Is Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian listed under other names? Yes.
Red Hat also lists Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian under more specific names, such as Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian Eus. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.
Which versions of Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian do the exploited flaws hit?
Each exploited flaw lists the versions it affects, as published by the vendor. Find your version, then patch.
- CVE-2022-0492Exploited list, 2 Jun 2026
Linux Kernel Improper Authentication Vulnerability
8.08.2 - CVE-2023-4911Exploited list, 21 Nov 2023
GNU C Library Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
9.0_ppc64le
Which Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian vulnerabilities are being exploited?
2 flaws are on the government list of vulnerabilities known to be exploited. These are the ones criminals are using now, so they go first, whatever their severity score says.
- 7.8Linux Kernel Improper Authentication Vulnerability
Linux Kernel contains an improper authentication vulnerability which could allow for privilege escalation via the cgroups v1 release_agent feature.
- 7.8GNU C Library Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so contains a buffer overflow vulnerability when processing the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable, allowing a local attacker to execute code with elevated privileges.
Which Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 64%
A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable.
- 13%CVE-2021-3737High
A flaw was found in python. An improperly handled HTTP response in the HTTP client code of python may allow a remote attacker, who controls the HTTP server, to make the client script enter an infinite loop, consuming...
- 5.5%
A vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s cgroup_release_agent_write in the kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c function.
- 4.8%CVE-2021-3733Medium
There's a flaw in urllib's AbstractBasicAuthHandler class.
- 1.5%CVE-2020-27842Medium
There's a flaw in openjpeg's t2 encoder in versions prior to 2.4.0.
- 0.5%CVE-2021-3744Medium
A memory leak flaw was found in the Linux kernel in the ccp_run_aes_gcm_cmd() function in drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-ops.c, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption).
- 0.3%CVE-2021-3930Medium
An off-by-one error was found in the SCSI device emulation in QEMU.
- 0.3%CVE-2023-4042Medium
A flaw was found in ghostscript. The fix for CVE-2020-16305 in ghostscript was not included in RHSA-2021:1852-06 advisory as it was claimed to be.
- 0.3%CVE-2023-5633High
The reference count changes made as part of the CVE-2023-33951 and CVE-2023-33952 fixes exposed a use-after-free flaw in the way memory objects were handled when they were being used to store a surface.
- 0.3%CVE-2023-4641Medium
A flaw was found in shadow-utils. When asking for a new password, shadow-utils asks the password twice.
Running Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 flaw being exploited affects software Acme tracks
Linux Kernel contains an improper authentication vulnerability which could allow for privilege escalation via the cgroups v1 release_agent feature.
- Matched to
- Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Patch first, then check for signs of use
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 11 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian, across 4 versions. The most recent Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian flaw added to the known-exploited list is CVE-2022-0492, on 2 June 2026.
2 are on the list of flaws known to be exploited. The most recently added are CVE-2022-0492 and CVE-2023-4911.
Red Hat also lists Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian under more specific names, such as Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian Eus. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.
Each flaw names its own versions, usually as ranges. The newest, CVE-2022-0492, affects 8.0, 8.2. The versions for every exploited flaw are listed on this page.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Codeready Linux Builder for Power Little Endian. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.