Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage is made by Red Hat. We track 6 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 2 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. Red Hat lists newer releases under their own names, such as Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage Eus, so check those pages too.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Is Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage listed under other names? Yes.
Red Hat also lists Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage under more specific names, such as Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage Eus. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.
Which Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 74%CVE-2021-44142High
The Samba vfs_fruit module uses extended file attributes (EA, xattr) to provide "...enhanced compatibility with Apple SMB clients and interoperability with a Netatalk 3 AFP fileserver." Samba versions prior to...
- 3.3%CVE-2016-7797High
Pacemaker before 1.1.15, when using pacemaker remote, might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (node disconnection) via an unauthenticated connection.
- 3.0%CVE-2015-1867High
Pacemaker before 1.1.13 does not properly evaluate added nodes, which allows remote read-only users to gain privileges via an acl command.
- 2.4%CVE-2015-1848Medium
The pcs daemon (pcsd) in PCS 0.9.137 and earlier does not set the secure flag for a cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission...
- 1.8%CVE-2016-2124Medium
A flaw was found in the way samba implemented SMB1 authentication.
- 1.6%CVE-2020-25717High
A flaw was found in the way Samba maps domain users to local users.
Running Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
The Samba vfs_fruit module uses extended file attributes (EA, xattr) to provide "...enhanced compatibility with Apple SMB clients and interoperability with a Netatalk 3 AFP fileserver." Samba versions prior to 4.13.17, 4.14.12 and 4.15.5 with vfs_fruit configured allow out-of-bounds heap read and write via specially crafted extended file attributes. A remote attacker with write access to extended file attributes can execute arbitrary code with the privileges of smbd, typically root.
- Matched to
- Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 6 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage, across 2 versions.
None of Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Red Hat also lists Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage under more specific names, such as Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage Eus. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.