Enterprise Virtualization vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.

Product10 versions
The short answer

Enterprise Virtualization is made by Red Hat. We track 37 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 10 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. Red Hat lists newer releases under their own names, such as Enterprise Virtualization Manager, so check those pages too.

See the riskiest flaws

We keep watching the known-exploited list.

Other names

Is Enterprise Virtualization listed under other names? Yes.

Red Hat also lists Enterprise Virtualization under more specific names, such as Enterprise Virtualization Manager and Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.

Known exploited

Which Enterprise Virtualization vulnerabilities are being exploited?

This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.

None of Enterprise Virtualization's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.

Exploit likelihood

Which Enterprise Virtualization flaws are most likely to be used?

Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.

50% or more10% to 49%Under 10%
  1. 98%

    DHCP packages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7, Fedora 28, and earlier are vulnerable to a command injection flaw in the NetworkManager integration script included in the DHCP client.

    CVSS7.5Published17 May 2018
  2. 15%

    The Floppy Disk Controller (FDC) in QEMU, as used in Xen 4.5.x and earlier and KVM, allows local guest users to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and guest crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via...

    CVSS7.7Published13 May 2015
  3. 4.5%

    Buffer overflow in the jas_stream_printf function in libjasper/base/jas_stream.c in JasPer 1.900.1 might allow context-dependent attackers to have an unknown impact via vectors related to the mif_hdr_put function and...

    CVSS10.0Published2 Oct 2008
  4. 3.6%

    Stack-based buffer overflow in libpixman, as used in Pale Moon before 15.4 and possibly other products, has unspecified impact and context-dependent attack vectors.

    CVSS9.8Published31 Jan 2013
  5. 3.5%

    ovirt_safe_delete_config in ovirtfunctions.py and other unspecified locations in ovirt-node 3.0.0-474-gb852fd7 as packaged in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3 do not properly quote input strings, which allows...

    CVSS8.8Published26 Sep 2017
  6. 3.2%

    The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.5, 2.12, and probably other versions does not "properly restrict the use of" the alloca function when allocating the SPECS array, which...

    CVSS6.8Published10 Feb 2014
  7. 2.7%

    Stack-based buffer overflow in the reds_handle_ticket function in server/reds.c in SPICE 0.12.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long password in a SPICE ticket.

    CVSS5.0Published2 Nov 2013
  8. 2.2%

    The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.12 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the...

    CVSS5.0Published10 Feb 2014
  9. 2.1%

    The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.14 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the...

    CVSS5.0Published10 Feb 2014
  10. 1.5%

    The REST API in the ovirt-engine in oVirt, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (rhevm) 3.4, allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files and have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors,...

    CVSS4.0Published11 Jul 2014
Precursor Intelligence

Running Enterprise Virtualization? We'll keep checking.

Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.

  1. Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
  2. We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
  3. Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
  4. Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.

Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.

FAQ

Common questions, answered plainly.

Something else? Talk to the team →

We track 37 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Enterprise Virtualization, across 10 versions.

None of Enterprise Virtualization's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.

Red Hat also lists Enterprise Virtualization under more specific names, such as Enterprise Virtualization Manager and Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.

Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Enterprise Virtualization. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.