Rfc Library vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Rfc Library is made by SAP. We track 8 published vulnerabilities in it, across 2 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Rfc Library, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Rfc Library vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Rfc Library's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Rfc Library flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 6.7%CVE-2007-1916Critical
Buffer overflow in the RFC_START_GUI function in the SAP RFC Library 6.40 and 7.00 before 20061211 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
- 6.7%CVE-2007-1917Critical
Buffer overflow in the SYSTEM_CREATE_INSTANCE function in the SAP RFC Library 6.40 and 7.00 before 20061211 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
- 4.4%CVE-2007-1915High
Buffer overflow in the RFC_START_PROGRAM function in the SAP RFC Library 6.40 and 7.00 before 20061211 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
- 3.5%CVE-2015-2282High
Stack-based buffer overflow in the LZC decompression implementation (CsObjectInt::CsDecomprLZC function in vpa106cslzc.cpp) in SAP MaxDB 7.5 and 7.6, Netweaver Application Server ABAP, Netweaver Application Server...
- 2.5%CVE-2007-1918Medium
The RFC_SET_REG_SERVER_PROPERTY function in the SAP RFC Library 6.40 and 7.00 before 20070109 implements an option for exclusive access to an RFC server, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service...
- 2.2%CVE-2007-1913Medium
The TRUSTED_SYSTEM_SECURITY function in the SAP RFC Library 6.40 and 7.00 before 20061211 allows remote attackers to verify the existence of users and groups on systems and domains via unspecified vectors, a...
- 2.1%CVE-2015-2278Medium
The LZH decompression implementation (CsObjectInt::BuildHufTree function in vpa108csulzh.cpp) in SAP MaxDB 7.5 and 7.6, Netweaver Application Server ABAP, Netweaver Application Server Java, Netweaver RFC SDK, GUI,...
- 1.7%CVE-2007-1914High
The RFC_START_PROGRAM function in the SAP RFC Library 6.40 and 7.00 before 20061211 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (external RFC server configuration data) via unspecified vectors, a...
Running Rfc Library? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
Buffer overflow in the RFC_START_GUI function in the SAP RFC Library 6.40 and 7.00 before 20061211 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. NOTE: This information is based upon a vague initial disclosure. Details will be updated after the grace period has ended.
- Matched to
- Rfc Library on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 8 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Rfc Library, across 2 versions.
None of Rfc Library's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Rfc Library. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.