Performance Co-Pilot vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.

Product16 versions
The short answer

Performance Co-Pilot is made by Sgi. We track 7 published vulnerabilities in it, across 16 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Performance Co-Pilot, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.

See the riskiest flaws

We keep watching the known-exploited list.

Known exploited

Which Performance Co-Pilot vulnerabilities are being exploited?

This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.

None of Performance Co-Pilot's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.

Exploit likelihood

Which Performance Co-Pilot flaws are most likely to be used?

Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.

50% or more10% to 49%Under 10%
  1. 5.7%

    libpcp in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) before 3.6.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via (1) a PDU with the numcreds field value greater than the number of actual...

    CVSS5.0Published27 Aug 2012
  2. 3.3%

    The pduread function in pdu.c in libpcp in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) before 3.6.5 does not properly time out connections, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pmcd hang) by sending individual...

    CVSS5.0Published27 Aug 2012
  3. 2.4%

    Multiple memory leaks in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) before 3.6.5 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or daemon crash) via a large number of PDUs with (1) a crafted context number...

    CVSS5.0Published27 Aug 2012
  4. 1.8%

    Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) before 3.6.5 exports some of the /proc file system, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information such as proc/pid/maps and command line arguments.

    CVSS5.0Published27 Aug 2012
  5. 1.0%

    The pmpost program in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) before 2.2.1-3 allows a local user to gain privileges via a symlink attack on the NOTICES file in the PCP log directory (PCP_LOG_DIR).

    CVSS7.2Published6 Dec 2001
  6. 0.4%

    The (1) pcmd and (2) pmlogger init scripts in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) before 3.6.10 allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a /var/tmp/##### temporary file.

    CVSS2.1Published29 Nov 2012
  7. 0.2%

    A vulnerability has been identified in the Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) package, stemming from the mixed privilege levels utilized by systemd services associated with PCP.

    CVSS6.0Published28 Feb 2024
Precursor Intelligence

Running Performance Co-Pilot? We'll keep checking.

Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.

  1. Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
  2. We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
  3. Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
  4. Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.

Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.

FAQ

Common questions, answered plainly.

Something else? Talk to the team →

We track 7 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Performance Co-Pilot, across 16 versions.

None of Performance Co-Pilot's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.

Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Performance Co-Pilot. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.