Sinec Ins vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Sinec Ins is made by Siemens. We track 37 published vulnerabilities in it, across 2 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Sinec Ins, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Sinec Ins vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Sinec Ins's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Sinec Ins flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 96%CVE-2022-2068High
In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found...
- 70%CVE-2022-32215Medium
The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly handle multi-line Transfer-Encoding headers.
- 46%CVE-2022-32213Medium
The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly parse and validate Transfer-Encoding headers and can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS).
- 31%CVE-2022-45092High
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 1).
- 21%CVE-2021-23337High
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function.
- 8.5%CVE-2021-3749High
axios is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
- 7.4%CVE-2021-23841Medium
The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate.
- 7.3%CVE-2020-28500Medium
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions.
- 6.7%CVE-2021-22945Critical
When sending data to an MQTT server, libcurl <= 7.73.0 and 7.78.0 could in some circumstances erroneously keep a pointer to an already freed memory area and both use that again in a subsequent call to send data and...
Running Sinec Ins? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).
- Matched to
- Sinec Ins on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 37 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Sinec Ins, across 2 versions.
None of Sinec Ins's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Sinec Ins. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.