Bouncycastle vulnerabilitiesNone on the known-exploited list.
Bouncycastle has 25 published vulnerabilities across 13 products in our catalogue. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. The most affected product is Bc-Java, with 19. If you run Bouncycastle software, patch the exploited flaws first.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Bouncycastle products have the most vulnerabilities?
Bc-Java leads with 19 published vulnerabilities. Open a product to see its versions and which of its flaws criminals are already using.
- Bc-Java
- Fips Java API
- Legion-of-the-Bouncy-Castle-Fips-Java-API
- Bouncy Castle Fips .net API
- Bouncy Castle for Java
- Legion-of-the-Bouncy-Castle
- Legion-of-the-Bouncy-Castle-C#-Cryptography-API
- The Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Java
- Bouncy-Castle-Crypto-Package
- Bouncy Castle Crypto Package
Which Bouncycastle vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Bouncycastle's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Bouncycastle flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 24%CVE-2017-13098High
BouncyCastle TLS prior to version 1.0.3, when configured to use the JCE (Java Cryptography Extension) for cryptographic functions, provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key...
- 9.1%CVE-2019-17359High
The ASN.1 parser in Bouncy Castle Crypto (aka BC Java) 1.63 can trigger a large attempted memory allocation, and resultant OutOfMemoryError error, via crafted ASN.1 data.
- 7.2%CVE-2020-28052High
An issue was discovered in Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC Java 1.65 and 1.66.
- 4.8%CVE-2015-7940Medium
The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie...
- 4.8%CVE-2018-1000613Critical
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs 1.58 up to but not including 1.60 contains a CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection')...
- 3.4%CVE-2018-1000180High
Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may...
- 3.3%CVE-2016-1000343High
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA key pair generator generates a weak private key if used with default values.
- 3.0%CVE-2013-1624Medium
The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of...
- 2.7%CVE-2016-1000339Medium
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the primary engine class used for AES was AESFastEngine.
- 2.6%CVE-2016-1000341Medium
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier DSA signature generation is vulnerable to timing attack.
All Bouncycastle products we track.
11 products, most vulnerabilities first. Find the ones you run, then open a product to see its versions and exploited flaws.
- Bc-Javabc-java19 vulnerabilities83 versions
- Fips Java APIfips_java_api5 vulnerabilities11 versions
- Legion-of-the-Bouncy-Castle-Fips-Java-APIlegion-of-the-bouncy-castle-fips-java-api2 vulnerabilities3 versions
- Bc-Csharpbc-csharp1 vulnerability1 version
- Bouncy Castle Fips .net APIbouncy_castle_fips_.net_api1 vulnerability1 version
- Bouncy Castle for Javabouncy_castle_for_java1 vulnerability1 version
- Bouncy-Castle-Crypto-Packagebouncy-castle-crypto-package1 vulnerability34 versions
- Legion-of-the-Bouncy-Castlelegion-of-the-bouncy-castle1 vulnerability68 versions
- Legion-of-the-Bouncy-Castle-C#-Cryptography-APIlegion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\#-cryptography-api1 vulnerability58 versions
- Legion-of-the-Bouncy-Castle-Java-Crytography-APIlegion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api1 vulnerability67 versions
- Legion-of-the-Bouncy-Castle-C#-Crytography-APIlegion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\#-crytography-api0 vulnerabilities10 versions
This directory lists the 11 Bouncycastle products with at least one tracked version, of 13 in our catalogue.
Running Bouncycastle? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
BouncyCastle TLS prior to version 1.0.3, when configured to use the JCE (Java Cryptography Extension) for cryptographic functions, provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. An attacker can recover the private key from a vulnerable application. This vulnerability is referred to as "ROBOT."
- Matched to
- Bouncycastle on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
Our catalogue lists 25 published vulnerabilities across 13 products and 337 versions from Bouncycastle.
None of Bouncycastle's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Bc-Java, with 19 published vulnerabilities. Its own page lists the ones known to be exploited.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track the Bouncycastle products you run. We match them against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and tell you as soon as we spot one that affects you, by email, in the app or by webhook.