University of Washington vulnerabilitiesNone on the known-exploited list.

Vendor
The short answer

University of Washington has 34 published vulnerabilities across 12 products in our catalogue. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. The most affected product is Pine, with 15. If you run University of Washington software, patch the exploited flaws first.

See the exploited flaws

We keep watching the known-exploited list.

Products

Which University of Washington products have the most vulnerabilities?

Pine leads with 15 published vulnerabilities. Open a product to see its versions and which of its flaws criminals are already using.

Known exploited

Which University of Washington vulnerabilities are being exploited?

This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.

None of University of Washington's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.

Exploit likelihood

Which University of Washington flaws are most likely to be used?

Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.

50% or more10% to 49%Under 10%
  1. 68%

    Buffer overflow in University of Washington imapd version 4.7 allows users with a valid account to execute commands via LIST or other commands.

    CVSS7.5Published16 Apr 2000
  2. 32%

    Buffer overflow in the pop-2d POP daemon in the IMAP package allows remote attackers to gain privileges via the FOLD command.

    CVSS10.0Published26 May 1999
  3. 19%

    Buffer overflow in University of Washington imap server (uw-imapd) imap-2001 (imapd 2001.315) and imap-2001a (imapd 2001.315) with legacy RFC 1730 support, and imapd 2000.287 and earlier, allows remote authenticated...

    CVSS7.5Published25 Jun 2002
  4. 18%

    Arbitrary command execution via IMAP buffer overflow in authenticate command.

    CVSS10.0Published20 Jul 1998
  5. 13%

    Buffer overflow in PINE before 4.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed message/external-body MIME type.

    CVSS7.5Published17 Sep 2003
  6. 13%

    Buffer overflow in University of Washington's implementation of IMAP and POP servers.

    CVSS10.0Published7 Apr 1997
  7. 12%

    Buffer overflow in the automatic mail checking component of Pine 4.21 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long From: header.

    CVSS7.5Published19 Dec 2000
  8. 9.6%

    Pine 4.44 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (core dump and failed restart) via an email message with a From header that contains a large number of quotation marks (").

    CVSS5.0Published11 Dec 2002
  9. 8.5%

    Buffer overflow in the mail_valid_net_parse_work function in mail.c for Washington's IMAP Server (UW-IMAP) before imap-2004g allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a mailbox name containing a single...

    CVSS7.5Published13 Oct 2005
  10. 6.4%

    Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in (1) University of Washington IMAP Toolkit 2002 through 2007c, (2) University of Washington Alpine 2.00 and earlier, and (3) Panda IMAP allow (a) local users to gain privileges...

    CVSS10.0Published10 Nov 2008
Every product

All University of Washington products we track.

9 products, most vulnerabilities first. Find the ones you run, then open a product to see its versions and exploited flaws.

Precursor Intelligence

Running University of Washington? We'll keep checking.

Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.

  1. Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
  2. We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
  3. Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
  4. Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.

Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.

FAQ

Common questions, answered plainly.

Something else? Talk to the team →

Our catalogue lists 34 published vulnerabilities across 12 products and 107 versions from University of Washington.

None of University of Washington's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.

Pine, with 15 published vulnerabilities. Its own page lists the ones known to be exploited.

Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track the University of Washington products you run. We match them against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and tell you as soon as we spot one that affects you, by email, in the app or by webhook.