Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller is made by Pulsesecure. We track 2 published vulnerabilities in it, across 0 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. If you run Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller, keep it on a version the vendor still supports.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Which Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 99%CVE-2019-11477High
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs).
- 95%CVE-2019-11478High
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences.
Running Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff.
- Matched to
- Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 2 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller, across 0 versions.
None of Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Create a Precursor Intelligence account and track Pulse Secure Virtual Application Delivery Controller. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.